Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Leah Hoopes The Delco Patriot

Channel

Leah Hoopes The Delco Patriot

@thedelcopatriot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

661subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380384002
TypeChannel
Username@thedelcopatriot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thedelcopatriot

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6616656637 August 2026 — 664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 663 subscribers16 August 2026 — 661 subscribers24 August 2026 — 664 subscribers31 August 2026 — 665 subscribers10 September 2026 — 664 subscribers17 September 2026 — 661 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 660–666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:20661-3
10 Sept 2026, 13:58664-1
31 Aug 2026, 13:24665+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:48664+3
16 Aug 2026, 18:34661-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:25663-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:03664first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4031.0%
🔥3627.9%
👍2317.8%
🤯1713.2%
❤‍🔥96.98%
🤔21.55%
👏10.775%
🙏10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC110 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM.YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE The work wasn't done in a vacuum. This investigation became a true community effort. Delaware County residents spent months reviewing public records, filing Right-to-Know requests, mapping business relationships, documenting municipal liens, examining Department of Health records, and asking difficult questions. Independent journalists also continued reporting on the

👍5

31 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC187 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The people screaming "No Kings" are the same people who spent years demanding Americans obey unelected bureaucrats without question. They defended censorship, applauded mandates, accepted government deciding who was "essential," and cheered while people lost their jobs, businesses, and access to society over private medical decisions. They mocked doctors who challenged prevailing policies, dismissed informed consent,

🔥5👍1

29 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC132 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In my opinion, for the last six years, I've been called just about every name imaginable by government officials, political operatives, and the media. I've been labeled a seditionist, an insurrectionist, a terrorist, a racist, an antisemite, frivolous, and crazy. I've received hate mail, death threats, disgusting voicemails, and have been defamed on a national stage. My son became a target simply because I exercised

10

28 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

For six years, I've watched ordinary Americans sacrifice everything to expose the truth only to have others take the credit, build the brands, and profit from their work. This isn't about jealousy. It's about protecting the people who built the evidence, preserving investigations, and telling the real history of the grassroots movement. History won't remember the promoters, and personalities... It will remember w

4👍1

25 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC127 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Follow-Up: The Cover-Up Is in the Redactions Delaware County and Duane Morris have a serious credibility problem, and their own records prove it. In 2024, they produced billing records that contained factual descriptions of election administration, Right-to-Know requests, ballot issues, records retention, and other governmental activities. Those records documented the very issues Gregory Stenstrom and I were public

5👍2

25 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Then something changed. Internal County emails now reveal that the Right-to-Know Officer asked Duane Morris: > "Would you like to check the already redacted ones and see if you would like to add any redactions..." Duane Morris responded with one word: > "Yes." Think about that. The law firm whose invoices were being requested was allowed to decide whether more information should be hidden from the public. But

👏1

24 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC84 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

To: Lee Awbrey, Solicitor Delaware County Solicitor's Office Mrs. Awbrey, Please accept this correspondence as a formal preservation demand regarding all records relating to Delaware County, et al. v. Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes, the County's handling of Pennsylvania Right-to-Know requests concerning that litigation, and the participation of Raymond McGarry in communications relating to the matter. Through r

👍6

24 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Delaware County has a continuing obligation to preserve all potentially relevant evidence, including electronically stored information. This includes emails, text messages, Microsoft Teams communications, handwritten notes, memoranda, calendars, mobile devices, cloud storage, server logs, backup media, metadata, and any other records within the possession, custody, or control of the County or its agents. Please ensu

👍4🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC91 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Applies only in specific circumstances involving bribery or kickback schemes. Ethics / Professional Responsibility (Non-Criminal) Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.7 – Conflict of Interest Rule 1.9 – Duties to Former Clients Rule 3.3 – Candor Toward the Tribunal Rule 3.4 – Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel Rule 3.7 – Lawyer as Witness Rule 8.4 – Professional Misconduct Respectfully, Le

4👍2

24 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/delcopatriot2020/p/why-was-a-judicial-candidate-copied?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=24vfjx

🤯2

21 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC125 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 NEW INVESTIGATION 🚨 For nearly six years, Gregory Stenstrom and I and other great Patriots have been investigating Delaware County. We testified under oath. We submitted disclosures to the DOJ. We filed Right-to-Know requests. We defended ourselves pro se and defeated two defamation lawsuits. Then Delaware County hired one of the largest law firms in the country and sued us. Most people know about the lawsuit.

7👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thedelcopatriot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leah Hoopes The Delco Patriot” (@thedelcopatriot), 661 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedelcopatriot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.