15 measurements spanning 39 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 09:15
1,865
+1
12 Sept 2026, 00:17
1,864
+5
8 Sept 2026, 01:35
1,859
+7
3 Sept 2026, 01:38
1,852
+4
31 Aug 2026, 06:28
1,848
-3
28 Aug 2026, 10:59
1,851
+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:03
1,848
+1
22 Aug 2026, 06:17
1,847
+11
19 Aug 2026, 06:57
1,836
+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:44
1,835
+4
13 Aug 2026, 09:56
1,831
+1
10 Aug 2026, 11:57
1,830
+7
7 Aug 2026, 22:06
1,823
+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:02
1,820
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:51
1,820
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
678 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
294
43.4%
🔥
178
26.3%
👍
70
10.3%
😁
47
6.93%
🙏
25
3.69%
💯
18
2.65%
😱
18
2.65%
🏆
9
1.33%
🤯
9
1.33%
🤔
7
1.03%
custom 5328194422913904366
1
0.147%
custom 5411365489643384239
1
0.147%
🤬
1
0.147%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thedf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Теренс Тао — один из крупнейших ныне живущих математиков. Его выступление про ИИ, однако, должно быть интересно не только математикам; файл со слайдами в первом комментарии.
Главная идея такая: разделение труда в науке никогда не будет прежним.
ИИ уже генерирует или в ближайшее время будет массово генерировать доказательства новых результатов или решения старых открытых задач. Редакции журналов завалены такими стат…
О чем я думаю, когда читаю в LinkedIn у своего друга, которого знаю со времен его побед на школьных олимпиадах по экономике и учебы в Вышке, что его компания подняла 170 миллионов долларов инвестиций?
Думаю, что усилия на поиск и развитие талантов были не зря. Ну и что горжусь знакомством, конечно.
Мощнейшее безобразие
Попробуйте найти в любой поисковой системе видео по запросу «вопрос в том, что все выступления сегодня говорят о мощнейшем безобразии» — и вы найдете много таких, где эту фразу никто не говорит, но она есть в автоматических субтитрах.
Оказывается, ее куда ни попадя вставляет ИИ-модель Whisper Large-V3 при распознавании русской речи.
Вот, например, музыкальное видео с выпускного магистратуры РУ…
Снова об ИИ на олимпиадах
В прошлом году большие языковые модели от Google и OpenAI решили Международную математическую олимпиаду на 35 из 42 баллов, что позволило бы получить золотую медаль, и это было большой новостью.
В этом году все модели набрали 42/42, и это прошло практически незамеченным.
За последнее время я слышал несколько выступлений очень уважаемых олимпиадных авторов, которые говорили, что «ИИ не реш…
International Economics Olympiad 2026
В Китае закончилась Международная олимпиада по экономике (IEO). 56 стран, пять приглашенных участников от каждой, восемь дней.
Мой любимый день на олимпиаде — день презентации бизнес-кейсов. Командам дают открытую задачу — в этом году, например, про особые экономические зоны, — у которой нет заранее заготовленного правильного ответа. Искусственный интеллект использовать можно, …
Два режима работы организаторов и жюри Международной олимпиады по экономике
❤50👍15🔥13💯10custom 54113654896433842391
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @thedf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вышка для своих @hse_live · 27,482 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Больше, чем экономика @economylive · 658,798 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДФ” (@thedf), 1,865 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
