What Is the Ruling on a Woman Who Does Not Perform Ghusl from Janābah While Knowing That Ghusl Is Obligatory? Question: What is the ruling regarding a woman who does not perform ghusl from janābah (major ritual impurity), while she knows that ghusl is obligatory? The Imām and Muḥaddith, Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī (may Allah have mercy upon him), answered: She is considered sinful, and she has committed something pr…

Channel
Islamic knowledge
@theislamicreminders
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,213subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001198891076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theislamicreminders |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theislamicreminders |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 1,213 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 1,209 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 1,211 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 1,210 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 1,211 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,210 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,207 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 1,205 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,206 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 1,207 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,207 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Intention Is Not a Condition for Prohibited Imitation Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Here is an issue that causes confusion for some women, and for some people generally: a person does something that involves imitation and says, “I did not intend it; I did not intend to imitate them.” It is said in response: Imitation is an outward appearance. Whenever that outward res…
Photo, posted without a caption
If You See That the Worldly Life Has Filled Your Heart, Then Take Heed Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Among the forms of shirk—and this too is subtle—is that the worldly life takes hold of a person’s very core and mind. You then find that his intellect, thoughts, body, sleep, and wakefulness are all consumed by the worldly life: what did he earn today, and what did he l…
Photo, posted without a caption
Is Every Believer Granted Success in Repenting? Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: If someone asks: Is every believer granted success in repenting? The answer is: No. Were every believer inevitably granted success in repenting, then every believer would die free from sin, and this is not the case. Rather, among the people are those who are granted success in repenting; o…
Photo, posted without a caption
Abu Ayyub Ansari reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: "If you were not to commit sins, Allah would have swept you out of existence and would have brought forth a people who would sin, and then seek forgiveness from Allah, and He would forgive them." 📜 Sahih Muslim 2748b
Photo, posted without a caption
𝐈𝐟 𝐚 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 ʿAbdullah ibn ʿAmr said, “If a man from Hell were brought out to the dunyā, everyone in it would die due to his hideous appearance and [unbearable] stench.” Then he started crying uncontrollably. Ar-Riqqatu wal-Bukāʾ, no. 104 🖇 giftsofKnowledge.net
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @theislamicreminders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@alwadeia · 6,6882 postsIslamic Biographies
@BiographiesIslamic · 1,0411 postFear Allah And Allah Will Teach You
@FearAllahAndAllahWillTeachYou · 6681 postA Series of Islamic Stories [From Authentic Sources]
@IslamicStoriesSalaf · 1,2211 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@alwad3ya · 12,8761 postThe Official English channel of Al-Sheikha Umm Abdullah, daughter of Al-Sheikh Muqbil Al-Wadei
@alwadeia · 6,6881 postChaîne française officielle de Cheikha Oum 'Abd Allâh (qu'Allâh la préserve) fille du Cheikh Mouqbil Al-Wâdi'î (رحمه الله)
@alwadeia1 · 6,2761 postدروس الشيخة أم عبدالله بنت الشيخ مقبل الوادعي
@alwadeia2 · 2,9401 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yks_kpss_pdf_kanalii · 26,945
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
@eqtpasathop · 55,887
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@pwugcnet · 45,844
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Islamic knowledge” (@theislamicreminders), 1,213 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theislamicreminders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.