Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Mackers

Channel

The Mackers

@themackers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,410subscribers

-1,550 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314900368
TypeChannel
Username@themackers
DescriptionКанал канала ЗЕ МАККЕРС ГУ: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/678765836aa9672b96b583a2
Created11 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/themackers

Growth

15,40516,96016,182.57 August 2026 — 16,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,959 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,951 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,852 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,834 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,077 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,850 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,524 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,515 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,513 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,488 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,443 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,444 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,438 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,419 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,411 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,409 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,405 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,410 subscribers15,4107 August 202630 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1,550. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,172–17,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:2615,410+5
29 Aug 2026, 01:3815,405-7
28 Aug 2026, 03:2715,412+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:2415,409-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:2715,411-8
25 Aug 2026, 04:3315,419-19
24 Aug 2026, 04:2815,438-6
22 Aug 2026, 15:0215,444+1
21 Aug 2026, 04:1515,443-45
19 Aug 2026, 07:4815,488-25
18 Aug 2026, 09:1215,513-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:2915,515-9
15 Aug 2026, 18:1515,524-326
14 Aug 2026, 04:5615,850-227
12 Aug 2026, 19:3316,077-13
11 Aug 2026, 21:3216,090-744
10 Aug 2026, 19:5816,834-18
9 Aug 2026, 16:3216,852-99
8 Aug 2026, 16:0616,951-8
7 Aug 2026, 15:0116,959first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 15,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,190
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held45 (31 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total233,740
Reactions total9,273
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,520
Videos
132
Links
511

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

9,273 reactions across 45 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,62971.5%
👍1,60117.3%
🏆1,04311.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 45 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @themackers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,110 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Внезапная суббота и стрим https://youtube.com/live/D99WLNUeZIo?feature=share

10

28 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈3,590 views122 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Ладно, а теперь это ощущается как смотреть на San Andreas в 2013:) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrtCnL62pB8

👍8927🏆6

27 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC≈4,080 views159 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Глядел я этот трейлер, пока не взлетел Мне почему-то глубоко побоку стало на GTA 6, у меня от Death Stranding 2 анонса было больше эмоций. Раньше игры ГТА были не просто слепком эпохи, они и были эпохой А у нас получились два героя из «беременна в 16», анимация тел словно тот же движок из ГТА 5, косо плохо поставленные катсцены на широком угле. Только свет красивый, это дааа! P.S. Могу 100 раз переобуться, я вооб

144🏆8👍7

27 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,220 views165 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Еще позавчера с Аликом обсудили - а теперь Стим Машина не особо-то кажется дорогой! Мак мини 900+ стоит, чего вы хотели? Если так подумать - нормально цена в 1.5 раза улетела. Мне другое интересно. Вот лопнет ИИ пузырь, ну не генерит он и 1/10 дохода от общего расхода на разработку и инфраструктуру. Цены будут откатывать на прежние? А то у нас обычно так работает - повышать умеем, а вот понижать обратно… 🤔

151🏆13👍1

27 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈4,340 views334 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Вопрос-ответ Скажите ка, в какой момент нормальным стало отвечать на сообщение 1-2-3 дня? И я не про момент, когда пишешь человеку впервые за долгое время. Я сам теряю диалоги, это нормально, бывает. Но какого хуя, когда ты находишься в диалоге, собеседник выпадает из него и может отвтетить... завтра? Послезавтра? Через неделю? И больше! Как ни в чем ни бывало? Почему это перестало считаться неуважением и хамство

👍24672🏆16

25 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈4,500 views259 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Home office А Neo прекрасно сочетается с таврическим садом ☀️

👍20448🏆7

24 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈4,990 views163 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Ну что, не увидят у нас лучшее шоу десятилетия. Причина? Полагаю, недавно ВЦИОМ проводил опросы «как вы относитесь к йе» и «слышали ли вы, что артист извинился», а сверху опросы очень внимательно изучают, знаю точно. Набухтели, углубились, слились. Отмена. P.S. Да искренне не верю, что это возможно на другой площадке. У нас страна контрапункт, но не настолько.

145👍10🏆8

22 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈6,320 views180 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Photo

Суровый геймдев 2 года назад мой хороший друг Тоха позвал меня поработать над игрой в качестве сценариста. Игра - а-ля старый NFS для любителей ночных гонок. Я тогда был занят своим фильмом, но находил пару часов в день, чтобы поработать с коллэгой над игрой - получился полноценный сценарий со всеми ветками сюжета. Чуть позже мой друг с командой игры разошлись, так о ней и забыл. Вчера, совершенно внезапно, мне п

152👍20🏆8

22 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈5,180 views116 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

10 лет назад вышел Blonde Френка Оушена Юбилей Blonde празднует вся Америка. Альбом повлиял на всю музыкальную индустрию, повлиял на сотни тысяч людей. Для них это - музыкальная библия 21 века. В GTA 5 по случаю выхода альбома даже добавляли Blonde Station. Самое печальное, что нам этот культ понять не дано. Слишком большая культурная разница, и в голове нет нужных нейромедиаторов, чтобы влюбиться в гениальность Фр

106👍10

20 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC≈5,470 views180 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Не портите себе настроение "сливами GTA 6" - это просто парочка видео отвратительного качества, где играют в древний билд игры из 2023го. Слили очевидно тестировочную сборку, где не готово примерно ничего - ни анимации, ни графика интерфейса, ничего вообще. Никакого нарратива, особых фишек - ничего не утекло. Под лупой пару вещей рассмотрели, но а так - ждем анонса, осталось-то всего ничего

161👍19

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @themackers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 684,165 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

spline
@spl1nee · 50,630
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Не шарю
@nesharu · 49,053
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Demin’s Lounge
@deminslounge · 64,739
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Technodeus
@technodeus2023 · 103,890
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
Хмурчик Technology
@khmrchk · 107,760
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Коммандер
@ilya_commander · 48,510
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Mackers” (@themackers), 15,410 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themackers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.