Channel
@themantiq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,764subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001224496448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @themantiq |
| Created | 26 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/themantiq |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 4,764 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 4,773 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 4,769 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 4,775 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 4,774 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 4,768 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 4,761 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 4,766 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 4,760 | +16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 4,744 | +9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 4,735 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:41 | 4,738 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 4,730 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 4,720 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 4,720 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @themantiq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Қисқа видеоларга қарамлик ўсмирларнинг ўқишдаги стрессга чидамлилигини пасайтириши мумкин TikTok, Instagram Reels ва YouTube Shorts каби қисқа видеолар ҳаётимизнинг оддий бир қисмига айланиб улгурди. Бир неча сониялик видеолар кетма-кет чиқаверади, ҳар бири эса мияга янги ва тезкор рағбат беради. Аммо янги тадқиқотга кўра, қисқа видеоларни назоратсиз ва мажбуран томоша қилиш одати ўсмирларнинг ўқиш билан боғлиқ одд…
Мияда мураккаб вазифаларда мотивацияни ушлаб туришга ёрдам берадиган орексин нейронлари аниқланди. Нагоя университети нейробиологлари гипоталамусда жойлашган орексин нейронларининг мақсад сари ҳаракатни давом эттиришдаги ролини ўрганишган. Инсон миясида бундай нейронлар сони 20 мингдан ошмаслиги мумкин. Улар уйғоқлик ва иштаҳани бошқаришда ҳам муҳим роль ўйнайди. Тажрибаларда каламушларга озиқ-овқат олиш учун тобор…
Posted without readable text
Ўсмирнинг яхши ўқиши ва дўстлари билан яхши муносабатда бўлиши учун энг асосий омиллардан бири — яхши уйқу Кўпинча бола ёки ўсмирнинг ўқишдаги муваффақияти ҳақида гап кетганда, унинг қанча вақт телефон ишлатиши, қанчалик кўп спорт билан шуғулланиши ёки қандай овқатланишига эътибор қаратамиз. Аммо янги тадқиқот бу омиллар орасида биз етарлича қадрламайдиган яна бир нарса борлигини кўрсатди: уйқу. Калифорния универси…
Мия салбий кутилмани ҳақиқий оғриққа айлантириши мумкин Одам бирор нарса оғритишини олдиндан кутса, бу кутилма унинг оғриқни қандай ҳис қилишига таъсир қилиши мумкин. Бу ҳодиса ноцебо эффекти деб аталади. Масалан, инсонга бирор муолажа оғриқли бўлиши айтилса, ҳатто тўқимага қўшимча зарар етказилмаган ҳолатда ҳам у оғриқни кучлироқ ҳис қилиши мумкин. Энг қизиғи, оғриқ фақат зарарланган тўқимадан келадиган сигнал эм…
Биз шакарни нега шунчалик яхши кўрамиз? Ширин нарса кўрсак, кўпчилигимиз уни ейиш истагини ҳис қиламиз. Мева, асал, ширинликлар — миямиз улардаги энергияни жуда «қадрлайди». Лекин, нега инсон ширин таъмни шунчалик яхши кўради? Янги тадқиқотлар бу саволга жавоб излар экан, шакар инсон эволюциясида биз ўйлагандан ҳам муҳимроқ роль ўйнаган бўлиши мумкинлигини кўрсатмоқда. 2017 йилда олимлар 140 дан ортиқ примат турин…
Ўрта ёшдаги 3 одат деменцияни қарийб 13 йилга кечиктириши мумкин Айниқса, 45 ёшдан кейин бу жуда муҳим. Олимлар 12 409 нафар инсон маълумотларини таҳлил қилди. Иштирокчиларнинг саломатлиги ўртача 25 йилдан ортиқ кузатилган. Тадқиқот натижаларига кўра, қон босими меъёрда бўлган, қандли диабети бўлмаган ва чекмайдиган одамларда деменциянинг ривожланиши ушбу учта хавф омилига эга инсонларга нисбатан тахминан 13 йилга …
Ўзбекистон ортиқча вазн бўйича МДҲ давлатлари орасида биринчи ўринда Мамлакатда катта ёшли аҳолининг қарийб 64 фоизи ортиқча вазнга эга деб баҳоланган. Our World in Data платформасининг Жаҳон соғлиқни сақлаш ташкилоти маълумотлари асосида тузилган рейтингига кўра, агар фақат аҳолиси 1 миллиондан ортиқ давлатлар ҳисобга олинса, Ўзбекистон ортиқча вазн тарқалиши бўйича дунёда 48-ўринни эгаллайди. Семизлик муаммоси Ў…
Фермада ўсган болаларда астма ва аллергия нега камроқ учрайди? Қишлоқда, айниқса чорвачилик фермаларида ўсган болаларда астма, аллергия ва айрим бошқа иммун тизими касалликлари шаҳарда ўсган болаларга нисбатан анча кам учрайди. Бу ҳодиса илмий адабиётларда «ферма эффекти» деб аталади. Энди эса олимлар бу ҳодисанинг эҳтимолий сабабини аниқлашга яна бир қадам яқинлашишди. Янги тадқиқотда чорвахоналар ҳавосида учрайди…
Тестостероннинг жуда паст ҳам, жуда юқори бўлиши ҳам депрессия хавфини ошириши мумкин Кўпчилик тестостерон қанча кўп бўлса, шунча яхши деб ўйлайди. Аммо янги тадқиқот натижалари бу тасаввур тўғри эмаслигини кўрсатмоқда. Олимлар 11 йил давомида иштирокчиларни кузатиб, қизиқ натижага келишди: ўз ёши учун тестостерон даражаси меъёрдан анча паст ёки анча юқори бўлган эркакларда депрессия ва хавотир ривожланиш хавфи юқо…
Ўйлаш ҳақиқатдан ҳам жуда кўп энергия сарфлайдими? Кун давомида оғир ақлий меҳнат қилганимиздан сўнг ўзимизни жуда чарчагандек ҳис қиламиз. Шунинг учун кўпчилик «кўп ўйлаш миянинг катта қисми энергиясини сарфлайди» деб ҳисоблайди. Аммо янги таҳлиллар бу тасаввур тўлиқ тўғри эмаслигини кўрсатди. Инсон мияси тана вазнининг атиги 2% ини ташкил қилса ҳам, у организм ишлаб чиқарадиган энергиянинг тахминан 20%ини истеъм…
Онг фақат мияда эмасми? Янги тадқиқот марказга митохондрияларни қўймоқда Мактабда ҳаммамиз митохондрияни «ҳужайранинг энергия станцияси» деб ўрганганмиз. Аммо Колумбия университети биологи Мартин Пикар бу органеллаларнинг вазифаси бундан анча кенгроқ бўлиши мумкинлигини таъкидламоқда. Унинг фикрича, митохондриялар нафақат энергия ишлаб чиқаради, балки мия, тана ва ҳатто онг ўртасидаги боғлиқликда ҳам муҳим ўрин тута…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @themantiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илм-фан | Science | Наука” (@themantiq), 4,764 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themantiq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.