Channel
@thenebulator
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,182subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001369065626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thenebulator |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thenebulator |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 3,182 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 3,186 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 3,189 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 3,191 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 3,198 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 3,200 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 3,201 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 3,206 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,210 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 3,216 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 3,218 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 3,222 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 3,226 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 3,229 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 3,232 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 3,232 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
360 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 182 | 50.6% | |
| 🔥 | 72 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 15.8% | |
| 😡 | 25 | 6.94% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 5.83% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.556% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.278% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My first thought was that Russia will, once again, not react to this. But then I realized, wait, they published evidence, in the media — this is the Russian equivalent of an open and shut case. The form has been filled out, the bureaucratic requirements met. So there WILL be a response. The only question is, will it be more bombing of the 404 Whipping Boy, or an actual strike against a NATO asset to send a message.
🔥12👍4💩1🤣1
Russian hackers have obtained evidence of NATO's direct involvement in strikes on Russian territory, according to documents they anonymously provided to TASS. "Bart De Wachter is a specialist in hybrid warfare. He currently works for HAVN (Hybrid Analyse Vigilant Network), an organization linked to [Ukraine's] Special Operations Forces and NATO intelligence," the hackers' statement reads. They claim De Wachter sent…
👍9
The "40-day influence campaign" was obviously a PR stunt. The equivalent of V-2 attacks on London. Doing as much damage militarily (i.e. none) but terrorizing civilians. Didn't matter then, won't matter now. The Empire and its minions are out of missiles, according to their own media (possible psyop, but they do hate the Bad Orange Man enough to wish him harm with such disclosures, so draw your own conclusions), so 4…
🔥29👍15❤3👎1
An Ukrainian drone killed seven people, three of them children, and injured more than a dozen at a beach in Gelendzhik, in Russia. On Saturday evening, they bombed a restaurant in Moscow, reportedly aiming at an Air Force general celebrating his birthday. Killed a bunch of innocents instead. Kiev is now asking for a ceasefire. I wouldn't give it to them.
👍33😡2
🧿 Update on the continued persecutions of Serbian citizens living in the NATO occupied southern province of Kosovo & Metohija. Source @WorkingBrother 😎 Buymeacoffee Patreon
😡23❤2
Walking through Belgrade on a hot summer evening, I had some thoughts about Serbia and the world. Enjoy!
👍14❤4
The river monitor that fired one of the first shots, SMS Bodrog, was scuttled in 1918. She was raised in 1920 and rechristened "Sava" for service with the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Scuttled again in 1941, she was raised into service with the Nazi-allied Independent State of Croatia (NDH) before the Soviets sank her again in 1944. She was raised one last time in 1952 and entered service in the river fleet of the Communis…
❤28👍15
OTD in 1914, Austria-Hungary began the Great War by shelling Belgrade. Vienna wanted a short, victorious war against the weakened Serbia, using as pretext the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand exactly a month prior, in Sarajevo. Looking through photo archives, I stumbled upon a caption of a tavern in Belgrade, described as the “Okhrana coffeehouse… in which the murderers of the Austrian heir to the throne for…
👍26❤7
July 27 is a day to commemorate the children of Donbass, murdered since 2014 by the Maidanite junta in Kiev. Honestly, the best monument to them would be sending 404 to Hades, just like its predecessor, the Thousand-Year Reich.
👍16❤6🔥5👎1
First Odessa, now this. Are the Russians actually trying to win?! :)
🤣14👍6
🇵🇱🇺🇦A Polish defense company employee was killed in an attack on an arms exhibition near Kiev. He just happened to be at the wrong exhibition. And in the wrong country. @Slavyangrad
🔥24🤣5❤2
Apparently all shipping to Ukraine has now been halted, because shipowners don't want their vessels blown up. Sensible. My very cautious assessment is that Russia might actually getting around to doing what needs doing. One can tell that by both the volume and the subject of squeals from 404.
👍17❤1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @thenebulator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TheNebulator” (@thenebulator), 3,182 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenebulator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.