Channel
@thenoiselesstrader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,115subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001399504497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thenoiselesstrader |
| Created | Between 1 July 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thenoiselesstrader |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 3,115 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 3,114 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 3,118 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 3,120 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 3,120 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 12,165 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 22.9% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MIDHANI is attempting a breakout from a consolidation that has been building for months. Relative strength has switched back to outperformance, while the OHLC and PnF structures are beginning to align - with the price breakout still awaiting EOD confirmation. See the original post for the valuation context, chart structure, and technical confirmation: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2097278784106012949
WOCKPHARMA has broken out of a base formed after a major rally and subsequent correction. The setup is gaining further support as relative strength shifts into outperformance, aligning with the fresh price breakout. The original post has the key levels, valuation context, and complete setup: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2096943166754832777
Nifty 50 remains bearish in both setup and trend, but the broader market is showing a different picture. Midcaps, smallcaps, and microcaps continue to outperform Nifty 50, making selectivity and market-cap positioning especially important this week. The full thread breaks down money flow, breadth, market-cap structure, and the key levels to watch: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2096571833881690262
Last week’s sector scan narrowed the radar to five sectors worth studying - Nifty Metal, Realty, India Defence, Capital Markets, and India Internet. The focus was on understanding what the chart structures were indicating across selected sectors using a multi-chart approach. See the original thread for the sector-wise chart observations: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2096197224753754318
Before opening a chart, three numbers can tell you whether a stock deserves a closer look: sales, operating margin, and profit. The key isn’t any one metric in isolation — it’s whether all three are moving together. Only then does the chart enter the process. The full post explains the reasoning behind this fundamentals-first framework: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7501491237720518656
🔥1
https://youtu.be/I5mhBiJv-Gw
❤1
SOLARINDS is seeing multiple confirmations align across fundamentals, relative strength, and technical structure. The recent price setup has already broken out, while the PnF chart has added further confirmation - reinforcing the same underlying strength from another lens. See the original post for the complete multi-chart setup and reasoning: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2095119566334804437
👍4
PTCIL is a clear example of why fundamentals and relative strength are studied together, not in isolation. Since the 17th August post, PTCIL is up ~10.5% while Nifty 50 is down ~1% — with relative strength still positive. The original post explains why this combination matters in the broader stock-selection process: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2094764768813109268
❤2
Finally, we have some signs of bullishness. The indicator is now suggesting a potential swing low at the current levels. However, this potential swing low can update itself for the next two days. If this level holds, we are likely to form a bottom at 23,800 levels. This is the first sign of positivity that we were waiting for, and we might see some bullish action in the coming days. However, this has to be accompanie…
👍12👏3❤1
MSTCLTD highlights an important point: high momentum changes how the trade needs to be managed, not just how it is entered. The breakout setup has technical confirmation, but in fast-moving names like this, disciplined stop-loss trailing becomes critical once price moves in your favour. The original post covers the chart structure, momentum context, and PnF confirmation: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/20944029555…
Nifty 50 is sitting in a no-trade zone, but the broader market is telling a different story. Midcaps, Smallcaps, and Microcaps are all outperforming Nifty 50, suggesting that strength beneath the headline index remains broad. The full thread covers money flow, market-cap structure, breadth, and the sectors on watch for the week: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2093934238710309363
This week’s sector scan has 15 sectors showing strength, but they are not all at the same stage. Nifty Pharma, Consumer Durables, and Auto highlight the difference: one has confirmed its breakout, another is awaiting follow-through, while the third still needs confirmation. The full thread breaks down all three setups with charts and the multi-chart process behind the analysis: https://x.com/kaushikaki/status/2093…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thenoiselesstrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Noiseless Trader” (@thenoiselesstrader), 3,115 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenoiselesstrader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.