Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 44 days, net +1,869. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,450–37,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:16
35,887
+1
16 Sept 2026, 16:56
35,886
-42
14 Sept 2026, 23:18
35,928
-80
13 Sept 2026, 08:39
36,008
-12
11 Sept 2026, 12:54
36,020
-723
8 Sept 2026, 17:57
36,743
-44
5 Sept 2026, 08:58
36,787
-25
3 Sept 2026, 15:37
36,812
-91
2 Sept 2026, 10:04
36,903
+2,036
1 Sept 2026, 08:54
34,867
+191
31 Aug 2026, 11:44
34,676
+101
30 Aug 2026, 10:58
34,575
+243
29 Aug 2026, 09:47
34,332
+91
28 Aug 2026, 07:45
34,241
-1
27 Aug 2026, 06:44
34,242
+19
26 Aug 2026, 04:53
34,223
+34
25 Aug 2026, 06:22
34,189
+32
24 Aug 2026, 09:15
34,157
+106
22 Aug 2026, 17:06
34,051
+85
21 Aug 2026, 11:14
33,966
first reading
Engagement
250 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 35,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,590
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 250 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
250 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
863,300
Reactions total
10,843
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 02:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,700
Videos
≈681
Links
≈5,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 02s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,267 reactions across 240 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,740
41.1%
🔥
4,014
18.9%
👍
2,435
11.4%
🤣
1,918
9.02%
😭
1,405
6.61%
👀
579
2.72%
🤯
554
2.60%
custom 5386587088873331829
447
2.10%
😱
280
1.32%
👎
265
1.25%
👏
230
1.08%
🤩
137
0.644%
🙈
103
0.484%
🤨
101
0.475%
custom 5274103128046705877
40
0.188%
🌚
19
0.089%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 250 of the 250 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 250 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thesteal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 250 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.80%
7 of 250 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,110
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,170
over 243 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnje5D3RM
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
2W5zFGJ4m9T
1
18 September 2026
18 September 2026
2W5zFGMD8Vo
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2W5zFJQ4FeZ
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2W5zFJVQHSZ
1
9 September 2026
9 September 2026
2W5zFJaEk6V
1
1 September 2026
1 September 2026
2W5zFJcotHw
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
⛹️♂️ «КЭС-БАСКЕТ» провел в Москве Матч дружбы с участием звезд и школьников
Когда еще школьник сможет отдать передачу Моне, сыграть в одной команде с Хряпой или получить пас от Фридзона? Все правильно: на III Международном Суперкубке ШБЛ «КЭС-БАСКЕТ» в Москве.
Этот Суперкубок на несколько дней собрал в столице 14 школьных команд из 8 стран. По словам президента лиги Алексея Фролова, международное направление заним…
🏆 Суперкубок Единой лиги — 2026. Финальный день
Начало сезона подкралось незаметно, первые матчи — уже на следующей неделе. А на этой прошел Суперкубок, последний день которого мы и препарируем прямо сейчас.
👉🏽 Результаты
«Игокея» — «Зенит» — 83:79
ЦСКА — УНИКС — 79:59
«Локо» — «Эфес» — 82:88
👉🏽 Перформанс дня
🇺🇸 Майк Джеймс
📊 28 минут, 27 очков (9/16 с игры, 8/10 штрафные)
📊 5 подборов, 4 передачи, 2 перехвата,…
🏟️ Единая лига планирует провести в Москве следующие Суперкубок и Матч звезд
На завершившемся только что Суперкубке корреспондент «Перехвата» Арина Терехова задала несколько вопросов президенту Единой лиги Сергею Кущенко. Среди прочих — вопросы о том, где в 2027 году пройдут Суперкубок и Матч звезд. Вот что ответил Сергей Валентинович:
💬 Следующий Суперкубок планируем провести в Москве, мы не хотим столицу никуда о…
🇹🇷«Анадолу Эфес» выиграл Суперкубок Единой лиги
В финале подопечные Пабло Ласо в равной борьбе переиграли краснодарский «Локо» — 88:82.
Мы не раз говорили, что «Локомотив» провел самую интригующую трансферную кампанию этого лета; этот турнир данный тезис только подтвердил. Кубанцы приехали без Тревелина Куина и Всеволода Ищенко, по ходу Суперкубка выбыл Маркос Найт — и все равно «красно-зеленые» играли на равных с …
🏆 «Химки» уверенно забирают турнир памяти Александра Петренко
Подмосковные «Химки» победили во всех трех встречах — «Югру», «Десну» и грозненское «Динамо» — и завоевали домашний кубок. Команда из столицы Чеченской Республики стала второй, Сургут финишировал третьим, команда из Брянска осталась без медалей.
👉🏽 Новички Суперлиги из «Десны» летом перекроили больше половины состава и заметно укрепились — в том числе бы…
🥉 Бронза Суперкубка осталась за ЦСКА
Подопечные Андреаса Пистиолиса сходу завладели весомым преимуществом над УНИКСом и фактически весь матч «везли» соперникам двузначную разницу. В итоге к финальной сирене на табло горел счет 79:59.
С начала сборов «армейцы» добились всего лишь второй победы — первая случилась здесь же, на Суперкубке, в игре с «Игокеей». Это позволило «красно-синим» завоевать бронзовый комплект ме…
Кажется, кому-то очень сильно повезет…
в баскетбольным конкурсе от Кинопоиска, Единой Лиги ВТБ и «Перехвата»! 😏
📌 Главный приз – джерси с автографом Джордана Лойда и 3 промокода от Кинопоиска
Условия участия:
⚫Подписаться на Спорт на Кинопоиске
⚫Подписаться на Единую Лигу ВТБ
⚫Подписаться на «Перехват»
⚫Нажать кнопку «Участвую»
🆗 Итоги подведем 5 октября. Удачи!
Участвую!
🔥22❤12👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 250 posts we hold for @thesteal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@thesteal edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Этот игрок выигрывал Red Bull King of the Rock 1x1 и играл за границей. В прошлом году в Суперлиге он не выступал, а в новом — будет. А еще он вернулся в клуб, за который уже когда-то играл. Кто это? 🧐
Вадим Балякин21%
Александр Захаров38%
Кирилл Писклов19%
Владислав Микульский12%
Даниил Ключенков10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Этот игрок настолько любит «Формулу-1», что играет на компьютере в гонки и купил себе специальный руль для этого. Он еще и фанат Льюиса Хэмилтона к тому же! 🏎
Семен Буринский29%
Дмитрий Родионов12%
Максим Колюшкин19%
Максим Карванен24%
Руслан Туманов15%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Этот игрок — просто фанат аниме, в частности, «Наруто». Возможно, таких несколько, так что уточняем: этот еще и собирал комиксы вселенной Marvel 🗃
Иван Прокопенко37%
Константин Шевчук14%
Дмитрий Макеев13%
Ярослав Аникин17%
Кирилл Савин19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@thesteal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@pbcdynamo named in 2 posts, 26 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 30 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
«Свободный агент». Канал о баскетболе @freeagent44 · 8,401#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПБК ЦСКА 🏀 @cskabasket · 24,167 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
topbasketteam @realtopbasket · 70,063 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Единая Лига ВТБ | VTB United League @vtbleague · 33,663 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
NBA. NEWS @nba_best_news · 34,207 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Лига Ставок MEDIA BASKET @ligastavok_mediabasket · 26,968 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
7 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Бако, Исмаэль(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Евролиги и был исключен из заявки клуба на турнир{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/9168|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Брайс, Си Джей(ru.wikipedia.org) “…получил травму колена и больше на паркет не выходил{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/9447|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Бревнов, Антон Павлович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…года вновь выступает за тобольский «Нефтехимик»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/5628|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Дженкинс, Джон (баскетболист)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…в пуэрто-риканский «Кангрехерос де Сантурсе»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/7502|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Хопкинс, Микаэль(ru.wikipedia.org) “…проведённых матчей получил повреждение икроножной мышцы{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/9441|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Хэмилтон, Алекс(ru.wikipedia.org) “…выступал за пуэрто-риканский «Индиос де Маягуэс»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/7611|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Шашков, Семён Александрович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…контракт с екатеринбургским клубом «ТСК-Урал-УрГУПС»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/thesteal/8243|title=«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе|website=Telegram|acce…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе” (@thesteal), 35,887 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thesteal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.