Channel
@thinklikekaranyuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
492subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001720297601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thinklikekaranyuk |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thinklikekaranyuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 492 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 495 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 494 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 487 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 487 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 47.0% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 18.8% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thinklikekaranyuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Первый раз об этом пишу, но мы вот уже 3 недели, как я работаю над проектом токенизации не один, а с очень сильным партнёром. И вот в чем штука. Сначала поговоришь с человеком, начнешь работу и понимаешь: это вероятностная история с шансом на конкретные договорённости в пару процентов. Проходит время, и эти вероятности становятся всё более осязаемыми. В этот момент начинаешь переживать: а вдруг все сорвётся из-за к…
❤2
В воскресенье был очень болезненный разговор с человеком, который хорошо понимает и вопросы финансирования, и работал в сельском хозяйстве. Я впервые получил фидбек не в стиле "Oh that's cool", а глубокий разбор проекта и подводных камней. И этот разбор сильно пошатнул веру в то, что я делаю. Не хотелось бы третий раз за год разочароваться в том, что делаю, и начинать с нуля, но даже если это случится - пусть оно т…
❤5
и даже в такой движухе участвую I'm a Magic Island Ambassador for August 2026 in Florianopolis. Use my ambassador link to apply for the Magic Island Pass: https://magicisland.xyz/56b3jid See you on the Island! 🏝️ #MagicIsland #Floripa #Startups #HealthyFounder
❤2🫡2🔥1
такие вот забавные подарки получаю от Даши. этакая электронная фотокарточка.
🥰1
Я готовлю свой проект к привлечению инвестиций.
🔥1
Порой просто поражаюсь, что же я такое слушаю. Но оно мне нравится.
😁1
Традиционно делю год на до и после дня рождения. В этот раз саму день воспринимаю просто как дату в календаре. Это были самые непростые полгода за последние 12 лет. По факту практически не было моментов, когда у меня была возможность хоть немного выдохнуть. Всё старое кануло в лету. Создавать новое сегодня подобно ремонту двигателя на полном ходу. При этом удалось добиться 3 важных вещей: физической и психологическ…
❤19
Так удивительно переворачивается жизнь: вчера ты пример для других, а сегодня едва удерживаешься за поручни последнего вагона. Я уже много раз попадал в подобные ситуации, и как-то в итоге из них выбирался. И всё же каждый раз, как первый. Наверное в этом и есть смысл.
❤🔥9🤔1
каждый день благодарю судьбу, что оказался во Флорианополисе. спасибо за природу, прекрасных людей и ощущение дома, которого мне так не хватало в других местах
❤12🔥1
Внутренняя модель OpenAI Astra решила 10 открытых математических задач. Некоторым из них было по 40-50 лет. OpenAI только что сделали про это большой пост, выложили все доказательства в Lean и ход рассуждений модели. Суммарно на поиск решений ушло токенов примерно на $2000 по ценам Sol. Пост | Доказательства Среди результатов, в том числе, доказательство существования несофических групп и sphere packing в высоких …
❤2
На мой взгляд наиболее губительным для стартапа является эгоцентризм его основателя. Возникает логичный вопрос, а как этот эгоцентризм отследить? Если важнее донести свою мысль, чем услышать чужое мнение, то это эгоцентризм. Если важнее дать информацию миру, чем познать мир, то это эгоцентризм.
❤3
Вот так гораздо удобней. Выложил дек по Бразилии на сайте: https://giantslabs.pro/brasil-agro-tokenization/
🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thinklikekaranyuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Думай, как Каранюк” (@thinklikekaranyuk), 492 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thinklikekaranyuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.