Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WELL😛

Channel

WELL😛

@thinkwewell

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,145subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735939258
TypeChannel
Username@thinkwewell
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thinkwewell

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1032,1802,141.57 August 2026 — 2,103 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,111 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,166 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,175 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,179 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,180 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,171 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,165 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,162 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,151 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,145 subscribers2,1457 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,091–2,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 15:202,145-6
10 Sept 2026, 18:412,151-11
5 Sept 2026, 17:162,162-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:252,165-6
30 Aug 2026, 01:372,171-9
27 Aug 2026, 02:242,180+1
23 Aug 2026, 16:562,179+4
20 Aug 2026, 10:372,175+9
17 Aug 2026, 20:442,166+54
14 Aug 2026, 16:582,112+1
11 Aug 2026, 13:482,111+8
8 Aug 2026, 00:002,103no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:532,103first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

967 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72474.9%
🔥14715.2%
🤩454.65%
🙏212.17%
🤯181.86%
🎉70.724%
🏆30.31%
🍾20.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 967 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,310 views143 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я в жестком процессе. Уже половина готова!!!! Можете мне помочь, если захотите. Мне нужно нарисовать картину, можете скинуть какую нибудь смешную картинку и я ее вставлю :р

🔥10226🤯10🤩4🏆1

1 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC651 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ОП!!! я во вселенной Metal Family!!!!!! Вписываюсь? Могу и вас так та нарисовать 😏

107🔥8🎉4🙏2

29 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,610 views118 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

95🤩14🔥7🏆2

26 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,210 views101 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Видели новое поколение? Че думаете?

92🔥6🎉3

26 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,030 views116 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Небольшой тикиток и поэтапка.. оч надеюсь к концу лета сделать 🥹

98🔥11🤩7

15 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,930 views200 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вы же поняла да? Ну поняли же да? 🫪

166🙏19🤩14🍾1

11 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,540 views168 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Может потому что это и есть Илюха Новки? 🤔

140🔥13🤯8🤩6🍾1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @thinkwewell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WELL😛” (@thinkwewell), 2,145 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thinkwewell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.