Channel
@thomaskorontai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,995subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001188391666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thomaskorontai |
| Created | 12 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thomaskorontai |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 3,995 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 4,003 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 4,008 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 4,027 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 4,022 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 4,027 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 4,032 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 4,033 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 4,038 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 4,042 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 4,052 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 4,051 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 4,049 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 4,050 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 4,050 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
327 reactions across 26 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 161 | 49.2% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 9.79% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 7.34% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 3.98% | |
| 💩 | 12 | 3.67% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 3.67% | |
| 🤮 | 12 | 3.67% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 2.75% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.306% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
E seguimos cada vez mais na companhia revelada dos extraterrestres. Só espero que não sejam lunáticos como tantos personagens que ocupam os postos mais importantes de nossas nações terráqueas😳... ..................... https://youtube.com/shorts/9ViLsToFqWM?is=aQ7qRF1zn6zhmq6p
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
👍12👏2
O que me assusta é a quantidade de pessoas que estão completa e absurdamente hipnotizadas pelas narrativas do escuros, tanto em relação ao meliante e sua trupe de gafanhotos que ainda ocupam o Planalto, como esse genocida global. Sequer percebem duas perguntas intrínsecas em apenas dois fatos: 1. O final da estada do demente Biden, outro ocupante ilegal do governo federal, foi marcada por diversas assinaturas de "per…
💩8👍2
E não é que tudo está em família? Que lindo, né? E o sogrão da moça? Vai dizer que não a conhece? Que o Lulinha é filho de um amigo dele? Sogro ou não, a proximidade é patente. E faltando em proximidade, observem como tudo está sendo feito com aproximações sucessivas... 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 ............. https://youtube.com/shorts/iYN80UH3H3U?is=IgF_tB9MXtYtX4VB
❤6👍1
A Aliança se consolida, e a última carta do tenebroso castelo do crime, está na alça de mira, o narco-terroristas do Brasil. E muitos deles estão instalados nos aparelhos institucionais do Estado Brasileiro. Fortes emoções vêm por aí, para nós, de suprema alegria e justiça, para os meliantes de todas as cores e espécies, as do pavor. Não terão por onde escapar. Nem fazendo cirurgias de rosto, como certas figuras do e…
🔥10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6👍2💩2🤔1
Parece que o "Lindinho" está com certo receio do trem que vai passar pelo seu pescoço, já que o ofendido é agora vice do provável Presidente da República. E, como Gaspar é especialista em segurança pública, "o trem vai ser pesado!"
👍14🔥3💩2
Considerando a linha que será seguida em consonância com o Escudo das Américas, para acabar com todas as quadrilhas e narco-terroristas, espalhados em todos os países, dentro das entidades institucionais de cada um, a escolha do deputado Alfredo Gaspar foi muito correta. Para entrar nessa guerra liderada pelos EUA, é necessário alguém conhecimento e experiência nessa área, e acredito que será essencial na condução do…
👍19
🇧🇷🚨💸A Polícia Federal possui, há meses, o registro de mensagens que mostram Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, o Lulinha, discutindo estratégias para esconder seu patrimônio da Receita Federal no exterior. Nos diálogos interceptados pelos investigadores, o filho do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva conversa abertamente com a empresária e lobista Roberta Luchsinger sobre formas de burlar a fiscalização e alocar recursos fo…
👍9❤2
Aproximações sucessivas...🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
Este é o tipo de notícia que cria muita briga e até ódio mortal, pois o tema é extremamente controverso. De um lado, a existência de um povo, espalhado pela Terra, e que buscava o resgate legítimo do torrão pátrio. De outro, a divisão entre semitas e sionistas, sendo os últimos possíveis "falsos judeus" com origem khazar (da antiga e ainda suposta Khazária). Porque trago o tem aqui? Porque estamos em Apocalipse, époc…
👍10❤2
Rabino Beck: "ISRAEL CHEGARÁ AO FIM" Israel não existe como um país, nem nunca foi uma terra prometida, divinamente ou historicamente, para o povo judeu. Sua existência é resultado de manobras geopolíticas, incluindo a influência de entidades poderosas como a família Rothschild, e funciona como uma construção corporativa e política, e não como um estado-nação legítimo. O status legal corporativo de Israel expirou e…
😐5🤔4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @thomaskorontai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CANAL TK - THOMAS KORONTAI” (@thomaskorontai), 3,995 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thomaskorontai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.