Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ThomasMore | AI для юристов

Channel

ThomasMore | AI для юристов

@thomasmoreai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003710494837
TypeChannel
Username@thomasmoreai
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 9 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thomasmoreai

Growth

4872606 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55 subscribers22 August 2026 — 61 subscribers28 August 2026 — 65 subscribers4 September 2026 — 69 subscribers12 September 2026 — 72 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 37 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:0172+3
4 Sept 2026, 19:4169+4
28 Aug 2026, 00:1365+4
22 Aug 2026, 00:3961+6
14 Aug 2026, 04:5655+5
10 Aug 2026, 11:3050no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:3750+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:1948first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4072.7%
👏712.7%
🔥610.9%
❤23.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Как юрфирмам структурировать базу знаний для AI Написал подробный разбор о том, почему юрфирмам необходимо структурировать свои базы знаний (knowledge base), что происходит с запросом к AI, если документы не структурированы, и что юрфирма получит, если сделает скучную работу по систематизации и тегированию своей базы знаний. Читать полностью → [здесь]

👍2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кто ведёт этот канал Меня зовут Араик Тонян. 22 года я так или иначе рядом с правом - от юрфака МГУ до практики в Freshfields и собственных арбитражных споров в бизнесе. Подробнее о том, как я пришёл к идее ThomasMore, - в посте Что такое ThomasMore AI-поиск по практике арбитражных судов РФ. Не общий чат-бот, который предсказывает правдоподобный текст, а инструмент, привязанный к реальной базе судебных решений - к…

👍5❤1

3 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTCviews —

ThomasMore | AI для юристов pinned «22 года в праве - и вот что я понял про рутину 🎓 5 лет на юрфаке МГУ, 8 лет в юридической практике. Остальное - в бизнесе, где тоже приходится вести дела, включая личные споры в арбитражных судах. За это время я понял главное: юридическая работа на 70-80%…»

1 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC677 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В Делавэре хотят создать компании, которыми управляет не человек, а AI-агент Отличная новость в развитие агентских систем. Делавэр - штат, где зарегистрировано больше половины публичных компаний США - предложил новый тип юрлица: Artificial Intelligence Company (AIC). Компания, в которой повседневную деятельность ведёт AI-агент, а не человек-менеджер: заключает контракты, платит поставщикам, ведёт операционную рабо…

👍5🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC≈2,910 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Большинство юристов используют ИИ неправильно - и вот к чему это приводит Когда говорят "я использую ИИ в работе", чаще всего имеют в виду одно: открыть ChatGPT или Claude и задать вопрос напрямую. Быстро, удобно, бесплатно или почти бесплатно. Проблема в том, откуда эти модели вообще берут "юридические знания". Всего два источника: ⚖️ Веса модели - то, чему она научилась на юридических материалах, спарсенных из …

👍4

27 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC57 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пока какие-то юрфирмы решают, каких legal AI вендоров использовать, Clifford Chance тихо решала более скучную, но фундаментальную задачу. Фирма вместе с Epiq Advisory for Law Firms и Microsoft построила свою базу знаний для AI: 400 000 документов, систематизированных, с метаданными, доступных через поиск, с полным соблюдением конфиденциальности клиентов. Юрфирма: 💡взяла свою базу документов, собранных за десятилети…

🔥4❤1

24 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Обновили аватарку канала. Это часть визуального обновления ThomasMore. Не теряйте нас 🔵

👍4

23 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Big Law идёт напрямую к разработчикам моделей Пять сделок за год, один паттерн: Orrick x OpenAI, Dentons x OpenAI, Freshfields x Anthropic, Kirkland & Ellis x Palantir, теперь Willkie x OpenAI. Логика везде одна: доступ к моделям раньше публичного релиза, свои инструменты вместо чужой платформы, сигнал клиентам, что фирма впереди. ✔️Freshfields x Anthropic - Claude во всех 33 офисах, +500% использования за 6 недел…

👍4

21 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Илон Маск в X согласился с утверждением, что браузеры, сайты и софт в привычном виде исчезнут. Я абсолютно согласен с этим. Я лично выполняю 90% личных и рабочих задач с помощью ИИ агентов. Я не ищу уже материалы в Яндексе и Гугле, не составляю сам документы и договоры, не делаю первичный анализ, не пишу код, не перевожу документы. Я использую агентов для всего этого. Я только вручную делаю работу, которую не может …

👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thomasmoreai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ThomasMore | AI для юристов” (@thomasmoreai), 72 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thomasmoreai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.