Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Полу-рест | ᴛёᴩн~ʙᴇщᴀᴇт

Channel

Полу-рест | ᴛёᴩн~ʙᴇщᴀᴇт

@thornSays

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

422subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669867094
TypeChannel
Username@thornSays
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thornSays

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4064224149 August 2026 — 406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 407 subscribers17 August 2026 — 410 subscribers25 August 2026 — 413 subscribers2 September 2026 — 415 subscribers11 September 2026 — 422 subscribers9 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 404–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 10:38422+7
2 Sept 2026, 03:24415+2
25 Aug 2026, 09:08413+3
17 Aug 2026, 15:38410+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:26407+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:46406first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

864 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542248500535391438926230.3%
custom 532352529095198971623026.6%
custom 542287193895761474622225.7%
custom 536619803301066474711112.8%
custom 5386508443727200942202.31%
custom 5474327055912942478192.20%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
86
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
72
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thornSays. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC451 views62 reactions72 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟 — пвч коллаба с Нюточкой!! Всем смотреть!!! #арт #мш 🌟— мне безумно нравится результат, не зря над фоном потел.🤩 будем рады репостам🥹 (вия, моль спасибо за звезды огромное❤️‍🩹)

custom 542248500535391438941custom 54228719389576147468custom 54743270559129424788custom 53661980330106647473custom 53235252909519897162

5 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC198 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😳 — у меня в тикитоке вышел видос! Буду рад если поддержите.❤️

custom 532352529095198971611custom 54224850053539143895custom 53661980330106647473

2 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC297 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026

— а тем временем.. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩? 🔂🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇.

custom 542248500535391438923custom 53235252909519897169custom 53661980330106647477custom 54228719389576147465

1 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC324 views43 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🪄🪄🪄🤩 🤩 — Гифтик для Вии с нашими дурачками. С днем рождения, родная!!🎂 #арт #child

custom 542248500535391438922custom 536619803301066474710custom 53235252909519897167custom 54743270559129424782custom 53865084437272009421custom 54228719389576147461

1 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC257 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sollleks_sPhoto

арт победителю лоты, завтра попосщу с самопиара🤩

custom 542248500535391438912custom 53235252909519897164custom 53661980330106647473

1 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC260 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😳 — Я В ШОКЕ🚨

custom 542287193895761474619custom 53661980330106647473custom 54743270559129424782

1 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC261 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 542248500535391438924custom 53235252909519897166custom 53661980330106647475custom 54228719389576147462

31 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC263 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Erikaa1newPhoto

Мне исполнилось 19 лет! Хочу поблагодарить всех вас, кто был со мной и продолжает быть♥️

custom 532352529095198971618custom 53661980330106647476custom 54224850053539143892

30 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC284 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

☺️ — спасибо всем за звёзды огромное!!

custom 532352529095198971610

30 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC296 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DBALIENAPhoto

#𝐏𝐖𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐝 Вот мой дизайн Пугода! Ладно, он мне понравился, я не про дизайн, а про Пугода. Думала до этого, что это не мой типаж любимых стримеров, но он крутой. 😎

custom 542248500535391438919custom 54228719389576147463custom 54743270559129424782

29 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC298 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53235252909519897166custom 53661980330106647472custom 54224850053539143892

29 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC417 views54 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎂— Сегодня трёхлетие этого канала! Более того, на кануне вы добили 400 подписчиков!! Дальше - больше, я верю в это.🥰 #арт #child ☺️— Хотелось просто сказать спасибо каждому. Без вас ничего бы из этого не было.☺️ 🤩🤩🤩 [Эквант, спасибо огромное за звезды!!]

custom 542248500535391438931custom 536619803301066474712custom 532352529095198971610custom 53865084437272009421

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @thornSays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полу-рест | ᴛёᴩн~ʙᴇщᴀᴇт” (@thornSays), 422 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thornSays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.