Channel
@thread_qa_blog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
897subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003706754029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thread_qa_blog |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thread_qa_blog |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 897 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 898 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 903 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 897 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 896 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
334 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5429270198983093739 | 66 | 19.8% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 18.0% | |
| 💯 | 35 | 10.5% | |
| ⚡ | 31 | 9.28% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 8.38% | |
| custom 5202216593966244027 | 16 | 4.79% | |
| custom 5391073908063480218 | 3 | 0.898% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.599% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обновления старого курса по Python или создание нового в ближайшее время точно не планируется Вижу много желающих на этот продукт, но старый курс все еще более чем актуален и очень полезен на 2026 год Подробная программа курса: https://lms.threadqa.ru
👍8❤5custom 53910739080634802182
Жиза?
custom 542927019898309373924😁14💯3❤2
Что делать в первые дни на новой работе, чтобы спокойно пройти испытательный срок? Самая частая ошибка новичков это сидеть и ждать пока тимлид сам принесет задачу, все объяснит и разжует На практике так почти нигде не работает В первые недели лучше максимально погружаться в проект самому Читать документацию, смотреть структуру проекта, разбираться как устроен код и какие в команде вообще приняты подходы И очень …
custom 54292701989830937399❤4💯3👍1
Ребят, накидайте в комментариях свои вопросы и на какие темы хотите подробный разбор Также можете задать вопрос через анонимные сообщения: https://t.me/anonaskbot?start=5p6gx06 Хочу сделать для вас много полезных постов и разобрать важные темы👇
❤4custom 52022165939662440273💯2
Posted without readable text
❤7custom 54292701989830937397💯3
🔥Новое видео на YouTube канале https://youtu.be/I7qCgTkBxas?is=pJSB7DPaJzvJEgmr
custom 54292701989830937394❤3⚡2👍2
Posted without readable text
❤6custom 54292701989830937393💯2custom 52022165939662440272👍1
😁😁😁
😁14💯5custom 54292701989830937394❤2
Всем доброе утро☀️ Сегодня хочу закинуть вам немного лайф контента В последние дни было очень много работы, но теперь можно чуть расслабиться Поэтому сегодня утром решил просто сесть в машину, поехать погулять по хорошей летней погоде и забежать в какой-нибудь грузинский рестик, чисто желания в моменте В общем, сегодня кайфуем😁 Расскажите вообще, кто как проводит лето? Больше отдыхаете или работаете? Дайте акти…
custom 520221659396624402711❤7👍4⚡2
⚡️Уже больше 25 человек приобрели новый курс Ребята уже начинают изучать уроки, знакомиться, общаться в чате и обмениваться опытом Как и планировалось, это уже не просто курс, а целое сообщество, где можно обмениваться информацией для узкого круга и помогать друг другу — кайф) https://lms.threadqa.ru/courselanding/java2026 Дальше — больше, работаем🤝
⚡14custom 54292701989830937398💯5❤4
Можете меня поздравить, ребята На днях получил визу в Японию, уже в октябре наконец-то поеду в отпуск, пора уже распробовать этот их трушный рамэн с саке🫡
👍39❤15⚡2💯2
ThreadQA | Олег Пендрак pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thread_qa_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThreadQA | Олег Пендрак” (@thread_qa_blog), 897 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thread_qa_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.