Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 92 days, net -210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,862–11,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 17:15
10,948
-4
5 Nov 2026, 15:21
10,952
+3
4 Nov 2026, 17:06
10,949
+3
3 Nov 2026, 15:06
10,946
+4
2 Nov 2026, 11:56
10,942
+2
1 Nov 2026, 11:26
10,940
+4
31 Oct 2026, 13:06
10,936
+11
30 Oct 2026, 15:50
10,925
+12
29 Oct 2026, 13:30
10,913
+11
27 Oct 2026, 10:59
10,902
+1
26 Oct 2026, 12:30
10,901
-13
25 Oct 2026, 13:44
10,914
-4
24 Oct 2026, 13:08
10,918
+6
23 Oct 2026, 12:19
10,912
+10
22 Oct 2026, 09:35
10,902
-2
21 Oct 2026, 05:18
10,904
-3
20 Oct 2026, 06:36
10,907
+5
19 Oct 2026, 08:35
10,902
-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:16
10,905
-6
17 Oct 2026, 09:28
10,911
first reading
Engagement
116 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 10,948 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.878%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 116 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
116 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
39,400
Reactions total
332
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 43s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,086 reactions across 97 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
871
80.2%
custom 5264767849125128298
180
16.6%
👎
35
3.22%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 115 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tigran_avanian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 116 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (12.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏆 Победители Мемориала Аксенова: 2022–2025
Вспоминаем всех победителей турнира по греко-римской борьбе памяти Героя Советского Союза Александра Аксенова за четыре года.
🤼♂️ Уже 7–8 ноября в Новосибирске на «Сибирь Арене» Мемориал Аксенова пройдёт в пятый раз. Программа соревнований доступна на нашем сайте
ВАЖНО! Рейтинговые турниры UWW 2027 года пройдут в Хорватии, США и Монголии
Официальный сайт Объединенного мира борьбы (UWW) определил даты и места проведения рейтинговых турниров 2027 года, эти турниры станут частью отбора на Олимпийские игры — 2028 в Лос-Анджелесе. Подробности сообщает WRESTRUS.RU.
По итогам рейтинговых турниров будет распределено три олимпийских лицензии. Рейтинговые очки дают семь соревнований …
Абдулла Курбанов: рад спустя много лет завоевать для России медаль в тяжелом весе
Борец вольного стиля Абдулла Курбанов на чемпионате мира в Астане (Казахстан) принес сборной России серебряную награду в весовой категории до 125 кг. В решающем поединке турнира спортсмен уступил двукратному призеру Олимпийских игр иранцу Амину Заре, ставшему четырехкратным чемпионом мира. Абдулла Курбанов в интервью корреспонденту WRE…
🇷🇺 Владимир Путин отметил триумфальное выступление Иналбека Шериева в Астане
«Вы достойно продолжили блестящие победы своих товарищей, подтвердили высокий статус отечественной школы вольной борьбы. В схватках с опытными соперниками проявили недюжинную силу, выносливость и по-настоящему спортивный характер», — говорится в телеграмме, опубликованной на сайте Кремля.
Президент также поздравил с золотыми медалями борцо…
📚 Ключевые события октября:
▫️ Интервью Степана Маряняна;
▫️ Интервью Маргиева — про Хадарцева;
▫️ Результаты выставочных схваток в Тамбове;
▫️ Яркая борьба Никиты Мельникова в Тамбове;
▫️ Губернатор Тамбовской области в окружении борцов-чемпионов на Мемориале Артюхиных;
▫️ Евлоев выиграл Артюхинский. Результаты;
▫️ Результаты Кубка Министра обороны в Кызыле;
▫️ Интервью Александра Карелина — Артюхинский, Сила тради…
Навигатор 21 века по чемпионам мира по борьбе:
Греко-римская борьба:
До 55 кг | До 60 кг | До 63 кг |
До 67 кг | До 72 кг | До 77 кг | До 82 кг |
До 87 кг | До 97 кг | До 130 кг
Вольная борьба:
До 57 кг | До 61 кг | До 65 кг |
До 70 кг | До 74 кг | До 79 кг | До 86 кг |
До 92 кг | До 97 кг | До 125 кг
Кайл Дейк и Кайл Снайдер выиграли чемпионат мира в пятый раз, Амир Заре — в четвертый. Остальные стали чемпионами мира впервые
Чемпионат мира — 2026. Астана, Казахстан.
Вольная борьба. Результаты.
До 57 кг. 1. Спенсер Ли (США). 2. Роман Браво Янг (Мексика).
3. Абубакар Муталиев (Россия) и Чон Сун Хан (КНДР).
До 61 кг. 1. Ахмад Мохаммаднежад Джаван (Иран). 2. Заур Угуев (Россия).
3. Кванг Ким (КНДР) и Маркус Блейз …
Триумф российских спортсменов на Чемпионате мира в Астане.
Российские борцы завоевали четыре золотые медали. На высшую ступень пьедестала поднялись Ибрагим Ибрагимов, Иналбек Шериев и Аманула Гаджимагомедов, а среди женщин победу одержала Алина Касабиева. Она стала седьмой чемпионкой мира в истории отечественной сборной.
Всего у российской команды 14 наград. Спортсмены представляли нашу страну с национальной символ…
Чемпионы мира наилегчайшего веса (до 55/57 кг) в 21 веке:
🇧🇾 🇨🇦 2001 — Герман Контоев (Белоруссия, до 54 кг) / Гиви Сисаури (Канада, до 58 кг)
🇨🇺 2002 — Рене Монтеро (Куба)
🇺🇿 2003 — Дильшод Мансуров (Узбекистан)
🇺🇿 2005 — Дильшод Мансуров (Узбекистан)
🇧🇬 2006 — Радослав Великов (Болгария)
🇷🇺 2007 — Бесик Кудухов (Россия)
🇰🇵 2009 — Ян Ген Ил (КНДР)
🇷🇺 2010 — Виктор Лебедев (Россия)
🇷🇺 2011 — Виктор Лебедев (Россия…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @tigran_avanian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мир Борьбы @borba_wrestling_tg · 63,293 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
СПОРТ БЕЗ ГРАНИЦ @sportbezgranits · 50,006 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
UZBEKISTAN WRESTLING (PANJOB)🤼 @UWW_UZB · 22,977 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 September 2026
WRESTLING RUSSIA Вольная Борьба Садулаев @official_wrestling · 20,500 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
Федерация Бокса России @RussianBoxers · 48,629 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
اینترنتِ آزاد - اخبار جنگ @farsiproxy · 34,777 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
ACA MMA @acamma_russia · 47,884 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Олимпийский комитет России @olympic_russia · 29,416 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Борцыклопедия | Первый борцовский канал” (@tigran_avanian), 10,948 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tigran_avanian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.