Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Time of Snooker

Channel

Time of Snooker

@timeofsnooker

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

433subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962268948
TypeChannel
Username@timeofsnooker
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/timeofsnooker

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

418433425.57 August 2026 — 426 subscribers8 August 2026 — 424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 424 subscribers15 August 2026 — 422 subscribers22 August 2026 — 418 subscribers29 August 2026 — 424 subscribers8 September 2026 — 425 subscribers15 September 2026 — 433 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:37433+8
8 Sept 2026, 04:58425+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:34424+6
22 Aug 2026, 18:13418-4
15 Aug 2026, 16:25422-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:20424no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:34424-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:11426first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2854.9%
😁1937.3%
🤡47.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Может аватарку сменить? Иначе Аллен так и не будет играть по сезону

😁5

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SnookerMaldivesPhoto

❌ Марк Аллен снялся с предстоящих турниров China Open и Wuhan Open. Марк снялся с двух рейтинговых турниров в Китае из-за личных обстоятельств. Его соперники без игры пройдут в следующий раунд. На China Open он должен был встретиться с победителем матча между Хоссейном Вафаеем и Лю Линьхао, а на Wuhan Open — с Майклом Холтом.

3 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC76 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Джадд вчера выиграл у своего принципиального противника турнир со счетом 11:6. Очень надеюсь, что Джадд вернет былую форму в этом сезоне. В Шанхае он был просто убийственно хорошо, но вспоминаем прошлые годы (за исключением прошлого), у него вечно отлично шли сезоны, но к Крусиблу он подходил уже уставшим. Пора завершать гегемонию Китайцев. Ну а первый рейтинговый турнир стартует 8 числа. China Open. Очень надеюсь

👍5

1 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC76 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проснулись, улыбнулись. Первую сессию проспал, но Уилсона и Синьтуна пропускать не хочется. Пока Кайрен ведет 5-4 и ушли на долгий перерыв до 14:30. Пойду на поводу у толпы и тоже поверю в Чжао. Хочется его финал посмотреть с Трампом, иначе опять там Кайренит выйдет и Трамп будет бояться играть в свой снукер. ❌❌❌❌❌

👍4🤡1

30 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @romanovsnookerPhoto

Мёрфи проиграл этот матч.. Это было так же драматично, как в финале ЧМ!

😁4

30 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как они десайдер заливают так, я вообще не понимаю 🙊 Пойду напьюсь окрошки с горя

😁2🤡1

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ставка от @maksagaf. Максим вчера залил свою первую ставку по свободной пирамиде, но его не остановить, он уверен в победе Зайцева. Его даже не смущает, что коэффициент подрос. ✅✅✅✅

😁3👍1

30 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Снова лудопресс под просмотр. Там прошлый финал ЧМ повторяется. Интересно. В фоне 3.15. ❌❌❌❌❌

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чтож мне так везет на эти черные последние, Джек, конечно, залил. Ужасный подбой после розового. Надо было отыгрываться, а не атаковать.

😁3

29 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Лис" хитрый, довел дело до десайдера с 5:3, причем сделал два сенчури подряд. Джон напрягся.

😁2

29 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ставка от @maksagaf. Это не снукер, а русский бильярд, свободная пирамида или как там ее. За нее вообще не шарю, но контент пилить же надо. Он еще и группу в MAX создал по этому бильярду 🤡 Если кому-то нужна ссылка по нему, то вот. Хочется верить, что будет лучше история, чем по снукеру. В Fonbet тоже есть, но коэффициент хуже. Pinnacle, естественно, такое не дает, так что я просто буду наблюдать за альметьевским

👍5

29 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лайв. Чисто в макс. лимит ебанул по фану под просмотр. 270 рупиев 😀 Хотя надо помнить, что Джек начал сезон просто убожески. Как и последние куча сезонов, но ладно хоть трофей залутал для эмоциональной стабильности. ❌❌❌❌❌

👍3🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @timeofsnooker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Другая История
@drugaiaistoria · 32,777
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Time of Snooker” (@timeofsnooker), 433 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timeofsnooker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.