19 measurements spanning 21 days, net +1,460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,179–12,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 03:28
11,878
-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:34
11,886
+7
25 Aug 2026, 05:33
11,879
+84
24 Aug 2026, 04:27
11,795
+44
22 Aug 2026, 10:22
11,751
+66
20 Aug 2026, 23:46
11,685
+62
19 Aug 2026, 20:24
11,623
+110
18 Aug 2026, 21:24
11,513
+10
17 Aug 2026, 22:47
11,503
+9
15 Aug 2026, 11:45
11,494
-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:07
11,496
+46
12 Aug 2026, 17:02
11,450
+143
11 Aug 2026, 17:15
11,307
+663
10 Aug 2026, 18:26
10,644
+13
9 Aug 2026, 21:31
10,631
+56
8 Aug 2026, 22:00
10,575
+173
7 Aug 2026, 20:28
10,402
-9
6 Aug 2026, 18:17
10,411
-7
6 Aug 2026, 04:04
10,418
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 11,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,300
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
131 (1 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
425,176
Reactions total
8,831
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,210
Videos
≈2,580
Links
≈4,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
4m 27s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,426 reactions across 123 posts, in 116 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,836
21.8%
custom 5395611519536894018
1,217
14.4%
🤣
943
11.2%
👍
562
6.67%
😁
552
6.55%
custom 5357461734523163189
335
3.98%
🤯
283
3.36%
🤡
162
1.92%
custom 5303028822252212412
147
1.74%
🔥
147
1.74%
custom 5305258502984325171
126
1.50%
custom 5303125725304345833
117
1.39%
custom 5303544102363615169
112
1.33%
custom 5305410562006473007
93
1.10%
custom 5433859255574746433
86
1.02%
👎
85
1.01%
custom 5296739894914207637
62
0.736%
🤮
60
0.712%
custom 5375243547668667651
59
0.7%
custom 5303331269554229063
58
0.688%
96 further kinds
1,384
16.4%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,831reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 129 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timeout_08. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 131 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Первое моё интервью в видеоформате. Записал его вместе с хоккейным агентом Шуми Бабаевым, который прилетел в Магнитогорск посетить Мемориал Ромазана. Волновался, а Шуми, наоборот, был очень спокоен и вежлив. Совсем не такой, каким многие его представляют.
Спросил про перспективы Ильи Набокова, про будущее Владимира Ткачёва в «Металлурге», новый контракт Егора Коробкина, адаптацию Евгения Кузнецова в Новосибирске, бу…
🦅❄️ Краем глаза параллельно с магнитогорским матчем смотрел «Авангард» – «Сибирь». Что удалось увидеть? Для омичей это первый матч предсезонки, так что нормально, что где-то не всё получалось и хватало брака. Это «Сибири» нужно начать сезона хорошо и в дальнейшем держаться в зоне плей-офф, а Омск своё на дистанции всё равно заберёт.
По-настоящему включились подопечные Буше только в третьем периоде. Начали активно и …
Немножко мыслей по второму дню Мемориала Ромазана.
🐅🏒
От «Амура» сегодня ждали большего. На турнире дебютировали Пилипенко, Войнов, Василевский, Чехович, Абрамов. Состав, приближённый к оптимальному. Тем не менее, снова есть проблемы в атаке. Не хватает реализации, всё где-то близко, но по итогу лишь один гол. Да и тот не после классического розыгрыша в большинстве, а после ошибки соперника. Большинство одно реализ…
🍯 «Салават Юлаев» вчера заключил контракт с канадским нападающим Мэттью Маджо. Игрок, который зажигал в юниорских лигах, но переход на взрослый уровень оказался непростым. Тем не менее, Маджо всего 23 года, он провёл неплохой сезон в АХЛ и имеет все данные выйти на новый уровень после переезда в Уфу. Отмечают прежде всего его атакующие данные, где-то по характеристике он напоминает Голдобина, только с опытом игры в ц…
📊🏒 Худшие контракты КХЛ по соотношению цена-качество:
1️⃣ з. Никита Зайцев (СКА⭐) – 75 млн рублей до 2027 года
Статистика: 0+0 в 18 матчах, «-4»
2️⃣ н. Павел Гоголев («Лада»🏒) – 17 млн до 2027 года
Статистика – 5 (3+2) очков в 34 матчах, «-4»
3️⃣ н. Иван Чехович («Амур»🐅) – 40 млн до 2027 года
Статистика – 14 (7+7) очков в 33 матчах, «-23»
4️⃣ н. Владимир Алистров («Ак Барс» 🐱) – 53 млн до 2027 года
Статистик…
Поднимаем планку: делаем 300 «🍯», и публикуем рейтинг худших игроков по соотношению цена-качество.
Было сложно, потому что с многие плохие контракты клубы расторгли в межсезонье, но они всё ещё есть.
✈️ Timeout | Иван Невский
Продолжаем совместную рубрику с хоккейным клубом «Металлург». Пять причин пойти на матч «Металлург»🦊 – «Трактор»🐻❄️:
1️⃣ Уральское дерби
«Металлург» и «Трактор» — два главных раздражителя друг для друга. Две команды Челябинской области, что только подогревает интерес, но это противостояние уже давно вышло за рамки региона. «Металлург» в 2024 году выиграл Кубок Гагарина, а уже через год в финале играл «Трактор». Чу…
Кратенько по командам на первом дне Мемориала Ромазана.
🍯 Ремпал и Шипачёв в одном звене выглядели интересно. Нет сомнений, что в большинстве они будут играть вместе постоянно, но и в равных составах их можно использовать вместе. Периодически, возможно, с ними может играть даже не более работоспособный Сучков, а Жаровский, и креатива этой тройке хоть отбавляй.
Вскоре к ним добавится ещё Мэттью Маджо – ещё один очен…
🐱 Вот это новость! Просто бомба! Хейс довольно много поиграл в НХЛ – более 800 матчей, был заметным центром. Играл в топ-6 «Филадельфии». Однако последние два сезона в «Сент-Луисе» и «Питтсбурге» он сдал.
Тем не менее, это, пожалуй, самый громкий трансфер этого межсезонья. По масштабу личности так уж точно. И большой плюс для лиги, что такие игроки к нам едут. Центр в первое звено, «Ак Барс» однозначно усилился.
✈…
⚡️🐉 По моей информации, новичок «Шанхая» Мартин Фрк выбыл из-за травмы нижней части тела на 3-4 месяца. Огромная потеря для команды.
✈️ Timeout | Иван Невский
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @timeout_08. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@timeout_08 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🐻❄️ Что «Трактору» было бы целесообразнее сделать?
Подписать Катчука за 65 млн + 10 бонусы50%
Подписать Кузнецова за 35 млн + 32 бонусы53%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,808 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
WORLD SPORT @sportsrg_w · 81,222 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Канал Алексея Шевченко, "День с Алексеем Шевченко" @derzhiperedachu · 59,997 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Роман с Хоккеем @hockeywithroman · 57,136 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
PRO наш Хоккей 🇷🇺 @hockey_vbros · 255,060 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Трансферы КХЛ | ХОККЕЙ @transfers_khl · 62,372 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Хоккей без зрителей🖥 @hockeybz · 93,441 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.