Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 50 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,365–1,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 05:39
1,378
+5
17 Sept 2026, 03:57
1,373
-2
13 Sept 2026, 10:57
1,375
+2
9 Sept 2026, 12:01
1,373
+1
4 Sept 2026, 08:17
1,372
-2
31 Aug 2026, 20:08
1,374
-6
28 Aug 2026, 14:03
1,380
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:14
1,381
+3
18 Aug 2026, 10:38
1,378
+2
15 Aug 2026, 02:47
1,376
+2
11 Aug 2026, 12:22
1,374
+7
7 Aug 2026, 22:19
1,367
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:05
1,367
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
214 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
61
28.5%
❤
59
27.6%
👍
42
19.6%
custom 5310038290483656274
11
5.14%
custom 5409015472517553802
10
4.67%
😱
6
2.80%
🙏
5
2.34%
💯
4
1.87%
😎
4
1.87%
🤗
3
1.40%
😁
2
0.935%
🥰
2
0.935%
👌
1
0.467%
👻
1
0.467%
😨
1
0.467%
🙈
1
0.467%
🤣
1
0.467%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Удивительно, но за первые 8 месяцев в нашем новом домике мы успели пожить в нем при температурах от -35 🥶 до +35 🥵
Диапазон весьма внушительный и считаем, что домик тем самым прошел отличную проверку 👍
И как раз завтра в Субботу на нашем ютуб канале выйдет новое видео о том какие за эти 8 месяцев были поломки, ошибки и доработки.
Получился интересный выпуск в интересном формате.
Так что ждём вас завтра и на ютубе…
2024 vs. 2025 года
Деревья растут и домик вырос
Несколько раз спрашивали за аренду нашего автодома. Но мы его не сдадим, даже за выгодное предложение. Все таки, это наш основной дом, созданный с заботой и теплом. А аренда это всегда немного небрежное отношение у вещам.
Дорога между Самарой и Саратовом прям какая-то заколдованная.
В первый год наших путешествий именно на этом участке у нас сломался холодильник. Мы так подскочили на ровном, как нам казалось, но волнообразном, как оказалось асфальте, что в холодильнике оторвало какую-то важную трубку.
А в этом году услышали ни мало историй от друзей и знакомых, чьи машины и автодома пострадали на этой заколдованной дороге.
В общем,…
Едем на уникальный фестиваль музыки и спорта - ULTRA100 💪🏼
Появилась мысль снять обзор на это интересное мероприятие.
Тем более, Виталик записался на участие в своем первом забеге 🏃♂️ Открывает для себя новый мир и активно к нему готовится.
От души погуляли по Самаре 20 км 🙈 решили устроить себе такой день отдыха 😄
👍9🔥6custom 54090154725175538022😁1🙈1
Signed Renata Timofeeva
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @timofeevi_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Фитнес | Худышка | Спорт @fitnes_hudaya · 20,808 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тимофеевы Life” (@timofeevi_life), 1,378 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timofeevi_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
