Кстати, а это — немного «закулисья» (бэкстейджа) по прошлогодней озвучке фильма «Грехи отца» 🙃.
🔥8👏2👌1

Channel
@timshtoksoundstudio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13,596subscribers
+79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001536379954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @timshtoksoundstudio |
| Description | 🎙Школа-студия TSSS | Научим вас звучать профессионально Хочешь попробовать себя в озвучке, но не знаешь, с чего начать, — приходи на бесплатный вебинар «Как зарабатывать на голосе» 👉 https://clck.ru/3UPsm4 Заявление № 6420413681 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/timshtoksoundstudio |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:19 | 13,596 | +4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 13,592 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:56 | 13,589 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 13,599 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:21 | 13,601 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:24 | 13,606 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 13,602 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 13,605 | +5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:29 | 13,600 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 13,598 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 13,601 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 13,599 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 13,597 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 13,605 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 13,603 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:51 | 13,601 | +10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 13,591 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 13,599 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 13,597 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 13,596 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,705 |
| Reactions total | 437 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,907 reactions across 71 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 599 | 31.4% | |
| ❤ | 520 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 302 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 118 | 6.19% | |
| 🤣 | 113 | 5.93% | |
| 🥰 | 61 | 3.20% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 1.94% | |
| 💘 | 35 | 1.84% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 1.57% | |
| 🎉 | 21 | 1.10% | |
| 💋 | 21 | 1.10% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 0.524% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.367% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.367% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.367% | |
| 🤪 | 5 | 0.262% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.21% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.21% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 0.157% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.105% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.052% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,907 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (13.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кстати, а это — немного «закулисья» (бэкстейджа) по прошлогодней озвучке фильма «Грехи отца» 🙃.
🔥8👏2👌1
Ну, как вам фильм? Посмотрели? 😉 А нам захотелось еще немного поговорить про закадровую озвучку и работы наших студентов — тех, кто выбрал именно это направление. Все участники озвучки фильма «Горячие деньги» проходили кастинг. Да, вне зависимости от их опыта и регалий — мы искали голоса, которые будут максимально ярко и правдоподобно раскрывать характеры героев фильма. Это был открытый кастинг, свой вариант озвучк…
❤10
«Вы только учите, а сами-то что вы сделали?» 🧐 Ну, например, переозвучили фильм «Горячие деньги» (англ. Hot Money, 2001) — это британская криминальная драма режиссера Терри Уинсора, основанная на реальных событиях. Сюжет рассказывает о трех обычных женщинах-уборщицах из Банка Англии, которые решаются на дерзкую и необычную кражу купюр, предназначенных для уничтожения. Собрали команду — и сделали. Студенты, кураторы,…
🔥11❤7💋2
Кстати, а вам по жизни какой принцип ближе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💘2💋1🔥1
Кто тут ждет отдельного приглашения на озвучку? 😮 Фраза «меня позовут» — самая коварная в профессии диктора. Она расслабляет. Усыпляет бдительность. Создает иллюзию, что где-то есть большая кнопка «Позвать Иванову», и ее просто еще не нажали. Так вот, спойлер: кнопки нет ❌ ✔️ Тебя позовут, когда твой голос перестанет быть «просто красивым голосом», а станет инструментом решения задач заказчика. Заказчику плевать …
❤7💘2🥰1
Еще очень частое возражение — это «да кому я буду там нужен! Вон сколько безработных актеров с дипломами! А тут еще и я такой — "Здрасьте!" 🤪» Во-первых, актеры с дипломами — не ваши конкуренты. В озвучке свои правила: заказчику нужен не «актер», а голос под конкретную задачу. Иногда — теплый и домашний, иногда — смешной, иногда — «как у соседа». И диплом тут не главное. Главное — решить поставленную задачу. Актер …
❤15👍7😁2💋1💯1
💗 Биржи могут стать отличным стартом для новичков: оставляйте своё резюме, регулярно проверяйте новые вакансии и оперативно реагируйте на запросы потенциальных заказчиков. Но не все йогурты заказы одинаково полезны. Рассказываем на реальном примере 🙃
😁12👍5🔥2🐳1
Многие новички в сфере озвучивания сталкиваются с вопросом: «Где искать клиентов?». Этот вопрос — один из первых, который возникает у каждого, кто решил монетизировать свой голос. И самый частый ответ, который можно услышать: «Иди на биржи». Это логичный старт, но не единственный и далеко не всегда самый прибыльный путь. 1️⃣ Биржи фриланса: старт, который работает Биржи — самый простой вход в профессию. Здесь можно…
🔥8❤4💘3🥰1
А еще, кроме денег, работа с голосом даёт много бонусов, которые не измеришь в рублях: 🔴 Уверенность в себе. Когда вы слышите, что ваш голос звучит красиво и убедительно, это меняет то, как вы говорите — и в жизни тоже. Собеседования, переговоры, публичные выступления — всё становится проще. 🔴 Свобода самовыражения. Вы можете быть кем угодно: драконом, старушкой, диктором на радио, героем аудиокниги. Это игра, кото…
🔥15❤8👍2💘1
Posted without readable text
❤19🔥7👍4
❤️ Вечер воскресенья... Что может быть радостнее, чем узнать, что на завтра сыну в школу нужна поделка? Кто был в подобной ситуации — вспомнит, кто не был — просто улыбнется. Ролик, кстати, создан с помощью ИИ, а вот озвучен — в TSSS. (в рамках рубрики творческое воскресенье)
😁20💯14🔥4😍2👍1
Мы тут не удержались и собрали для вас подборку шуток про ИИ 😄 А если у вас есть свой любимый мем на эту тему — публикуйте в комментариях, посмеемся вместе!
😁20🤪5🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @timshtoksoundstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@timshtoksoundstudio edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кстати, а вам по жизни какой принцип ближе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы обычно чувствуете себя перед тем, как нажать «запись»🎙 ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой из советов выше вы считаете наиболее важным? (можно выбрать несколько)
The shares total 304%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А как у вас с навыком быстрой и чистой речи?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tim Shtok Sound Studio” (@timshtoksoundstudio), 13,596 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timshtoksoundstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.