Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,078–10,145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 14:41
10,093
-6
15 Sept 2026, 12:57
10,099
-4
13 Sept 2026, 20:42
10,103
+8
12 Sept 2026, 00:56
10,095
-5
6 Sept 2026, 08:36
10,100
+5
4 Sept 2026, 02:17
10,095
-2
2 Sept 2026, 18:13
10,097
+8
1 Sept 2026, 18:55
10,089
+2
30 Aug 2026, 15:57
10,087
+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:13
10,086
-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:07
10,088
-2
26 Aug 2026, 19:43
10,090
-4
25 Aug 2026, 18:25
10,094
-2
24 Aug 2026, 18:48
10,096
+4
23 Aug 2026, 01:24
10,092
-2
21 Aug 2026, 16:36
10,094
-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:54
10,100
-6
19 Aug 2026, 20:07
10,106
-5
18 Aug 2026, 21:18
10,111
-7
17 Aug 2026, 23:25
10,118
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.95%
avg views ÷ 10,093 subscribers
Avg views / post
903
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
37 (22 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
903
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
56s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,394 reactions across 37 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
769
55.2%
❤
207
14.8%
🐳
117
8.39%
👍
108
7.75%
😁
82
5.88%
🙏
26
1.87%
🤯
20
1.43%
🤝
14
1.00%
✍
13
0.933%
👌
12
0.861%
💯
8
0.574%
😴
6
0.43%
🎉
4
0.287%
👀
4
0.287%
🤩
2
0.143%
👏
1
0.072%
😍
1
0.072%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,394 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 37 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timur_sevos_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У криптана два праздника: растёт биткоин и растёт доллар.
Про первый пишут все. Второй тихо решает, сколько у тебя останется денег.
Этой осенью нас ждут перемены, которых давно не было. Они случатся в любом случае: готов ты или нет, никто не спрашивает.
Подготовиться можно ровно одним способом - заранее знать, что будет. Тогда это уже не новость, а расписание.
❗️ Без капса и без паники, я сел и посчитал по официал…
Пока наши портфели тают, кто-то на этом же рынке зарабатывает невероятные деньги
Полез смотреть, кто именно - в отчётность на sec.gov
Мы считаем убытки, а эти ребята прямо сейчас выгребают из падения огромные суммы. За такими стоит следить в первую очередь - не ради зависти, а ради модели, которую можно перенести на свой портфель.
Смотри, о ком речь:
• BlackRock - управляет биткоином клиентов
• Coinbase - один отч…
Угадаешь по дизайну, где платят 20% на доллар?
Пришло уведомление от наших AI-агентов
Каждое утро мне приходит несколько уведомлений о доходностях в пулах ликвидности, о новостях с рынка и в том числе о том, где сколько платят на доллар в DeFi.
И сегодня я был шокирован, что один из самых надежных, безопасных протоколов, в принципе, платят ну очень много на USDT и самое обидное, что мало кто это знает, мало кто эти…
Сколько ты зарабатываешь?
Средняя зарплата в стране по Росстату - 110 216 рублей. Медианная, то есть та, что реально у половины работающих, - 65 307.
Росстат очень интересно считает среднюю. Когда у одних миллионы, а у других тридцать тысяч, и получается та самая красивая цифра, которую никто не видел в своей платёжке.
Поэтому считаем честно, от медианы. Сколько нужно капитала, чтобы он платил тебе 65 307 рублей в…
Ты вчера опять всё проспал?
Просыпаешься, а эфир уже +23%.
Чтобы ты понимал, насколько это редкое событие, за всю историю эфира таких дней всего 16 из 3 744.
В ленте «разворот», «начало движения», «последний шанс зайти». И внутри поднимается тухлое: все успели, кроме тебя.
Я вчера тоже ничего не сделал. Сейчас объясню, почему это хорошо.
⬇️ Что произошло
Три новости в одно окно: Минфин США удвоил выкуп длинных …
Отдал ключи от кошелька ИИ-агенту
Ровно это и продают: ты спишь, программа зарабатывает.
Только я не покупал чужого бота, а написал своего. Он сам ходил по пяти сетям и без меня двигал деньги:
• Сам искал, где доходность выше
• Сам вынимал ликвидность и перекидывал её в другую сеть
• Сам заходил в новый пул. Каждые полчаса, круглосуточно
Показываю в ролике, что он творил с деньгами, пока я спал, и что в итоге е…
🔥13👌5🐳3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @timur_sevos_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTUS ACADEMY @cryptus_academy · 56,854 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
CryptoInside @crypt0inside · 28,633 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
CRYPTUS MEDIA @CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Инвестиции с Никитой Куценко @kutsenko_invest · 28,315 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
Коненков Святослав | White Way @konenkov_official · 70,924 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Crypto Family Public @CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,298 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тимур Севостьянов 🐳” (@timur_sevos_blog), 10,093 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timur_sevos_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.