Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Титов | город и мы

Channel

Игорь Титов | город и мы

@titovnews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

316subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001130036407
TypeChannel
Username@titovnews
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/titovnews

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2783162976 August 2026 — 278 subscribers6 August 2026 — 278 subscribers21 August 2026 — 286 subscribers27 August 2026 — 295 subscribers4 September 2026 — 312 subscribers12 September 2026 — 316 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:15316+4
4 Sept 2026, 17:59312+17
27 Aug 2026, 05:22295+9
21 Aug 2026, 01:43286+8
6 Aug 2026, 23:31278no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:19278first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2640.0%
👍2233.8%
😡69.23%
🔥57.69%
🤔23.08%
🥱23.08%
👎11.54%
🤝11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC100 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Le Figaro: La pelouse de la rue Lizyukov à Voronej s'est avérée plus belle que toute la France.

😁8

5 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SMEHNOFPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SMEHNOF

Автор в восторге от нового газона в Северном А мне скорее грустно. Печально от того, что нормальный газон воспринимается как нечто феноменальное для Воронежа. Представляете уровень, до которого довели город? У жителей уже нет ожиданий прорывных проектов. Дайте хотя бы обычный газон.

😁3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC97 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vkursevrnPhoto

Зачем нам Франция, когда есть Лизюкова В Воронеже преобразился газон на улице Лизюкова. И это - заслуга глава Коминтерновского района Виталия Позднякова. Господин Поздняков показал всем коллегам мастер-класс: как можно выполнить поручение губернатора и обустроить внешний вид улицы. Итак, что мы видим. Остановка 60 лет ВЛКСМ, улица Лизюкова. На месте обычного потрепанного жизнью участка вырос газон. Это просто чудо …

👍4🥱1

4 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vrntrans

Posted without readable text

😡2🥱1

4 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yurbvrn

«"Метробуса" в Воронеже не было». Ж. Бодрийяр. Вчера мэр рассказал, что чиновники прорабатывают разные варианты крепления «делинеаторов» (которые на самом деле таковыми не оказались). Проблема в том, что сразу с момента их установки по ним начали ездить, и, о невероятное, они не выдержали. 📌В моей голове сидит крамольная мысль, что дело тут даже не в крепеже... А в том, что ДЕЛИНЕАТОРЫ не рассчитаны на то, что по н…

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У кого сомнения по поводу стадиона — можно заехать посмотреть, работы идут.

🔥2🤔2

4 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC405 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«Капитал избегает шума и брани и отличается боязливой натурой. Это правда, но это ещё не вся правда. Капитал боится отсутствия прибыли или слишком маленькой прибыли, как природа боится пустоты. Но раз имеется в наличии достаточная прибыль, капитал становится смелым. Обеспечьте 10 процентов, и капитал согласен на всякое применение, при 20 процентах он становится оживлённым, при 50 процентах положительно готов сломать …

👍5

4 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vrntransPhoto

Говорят, мэрия перебрала 5 вариантов крепления "делиниатора" к асфальту, и все пока - провал. Потому, что то, что вы купили - это не совсем делиниаторы, а парковочные колесоотбойники. А делиниаторы (самые простые) выглядят как-то так. Оптимально надо купить 20-сантиметровые, тогда желание скакать через них пропадёт сразу. Через эту резиновую лажу будут продолжать ездить, потому она даже не чувствуется на большинств…

😁6

3 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC130 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⬆️⚡️мне сообщили, что вопрос тут еще не закрыт, на днях выясню детали и напишу.

👍5🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @titovnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Все правильно сделали у юности?

  1. Да, пусть будет дорога пошире10%
  2. Нет, тут нужен широкий тротуар81%
  3. Вообще все равно как тут будет10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Титов | город и мы” (@titovnews), 316 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/titovnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.