Channel
@tomoko_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
322subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002019451870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomoko_channel |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomoko_channel |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 322 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 323 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 325 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 318 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 317 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 316 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 316 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 38.1% | |
| custom 5188344841737610949 | 12 | 28.6% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 😇 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 9.52% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最近在「壹个村小」成都夏令营做了几周义工，跟创始人聊了很多。 他 06 年本科计算机毕业，做了三个月开发后发现并不是心之所向，去云南支教，后来和同行的小伙伴一起创立了这个公益助学组织，到现在做了接近 20 年。 组织的官网是他 2008 年用 Adobe Dreamweaver 做的，用的 ASP 和 Microsoft Access，到现在几乎不可维护，于是在义工期间我回归自己的本行，花了一周多使用 Next.js + Postgres 完全重构了整个网站页面、DB 数据结构和所有的后端逻辑，在这周一正式上线了。 创始人跟我说，他们的大量时间花在了捐助人和学生之间的信息传达和沟通上，现在每年新增学生大概七八百，同时在管理的学生两三千，有这样一个更好的系统省下的时间，或许能让他们跟更多的学校和学生去家访沟通，每年或许能有更多的容量帮助到更多的学生，哪怕只是几十个。 在 AI Coding 的时代，时常觉得代码已经毫无价值…
那些一辈子仅能体验一次的神级游戏！通关即是永失！ 碍于篇幅原因还有好多值得一玩的游戏没能纳入进榜单之中（像是废都物语。。） 如果你心目中有什么一生仅能体验一次的游戏神作，不妨打在弹幕或是评论区中互相安利~ @华鸽儿: 发布视频 播放量:23.04万 弹幕:588 评论:1574 点赞:7490 投币:2023 收藏:1.36万 转发:535 发布日期:2026-07-24 03:00:00 上传日期:2026-07-22 16:23:16 🔝> : 你心目中有那种“一生仅能体验一次”的游戏吗，欢迎打在评论区中互相安利[给心心]
刚才思考了一件事儿。传统上程序员的工作实际上是在把模糊的需求组织成合适的工作流程，然后具像化为一段可执行的逻辑代码。LLM 写代码本质上干的事情也是一样的。 然后，以往我有个观察是，通常熟悉代码的人写文字会更有逻辑。有可能这人的内容比较干，也有可能比较咬文嚼字，但总体而言读他们的文字会比较容易了解作者的想法。 而 LLM 最擅长的事情，也就是写文字。
昨晚发现我的 Windows 上登录了那个账号，所以迁过来，然后弄了一个「小丧势力」。 PS. 上周目的频道 owner 归属权也回来了～
❤6custom 51883448417376109493
Posted without readable text
AI 编程时代，被誉为「软件工程圣经」的《人月神话》，有哪些理论过时了？ | 原文
📝 渣渣圈 X 专业 X 兴趣爱好 #blog 什么世界观、人生观、价值观都是ACG作品里面学的；真是 https://niracler.com/amateur-circle-profession-hobbies
❤5custom 51883448417376109492
这位真是太好看了❤️
❤5
？
代入角色的变化 有时候会代入一些动画作品里面的角色，例如《火影忍者》里面牙。小时候看中忍考试中他输给鸣人，我觉得很开心，算是出口气了，那个时候我代入的是鸣人。后面佐助夺回篇章里面，也觉得他的双头犬撞罗生门超级帅气。那时候我还没有去代入他。 直到博人传里面，就自然代入牙了，天天也是喊着要当火影，但是永远都是「明天再开始吧」的那种感觉。只会动嘴皮子，或者说，即使努力了，也没有走对方向什么的。 而到了我现在这个年纪，连自己口中说出来的话，我自己都不信了，也终于再也无法代入热血少年漫里面的主角了。 #杂谈
custom 51883448417376109494
[科普向] 再不转发这个视频，地编就要统治终末地了( 地编和关卡都是我的翅膀！ @熊人族嗷非秀: 发布视频 播放量:10.77万 弹幕:615 评论:735 点赞:8354 投币:4662 收藏:2607 转发:645 发布日期:2026-07-29 04:00:00 上传日期:2026-07-28 18:35:18
涂击队，启动
👏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tomoko_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tomoko RD” (@tomoko_channel), 322 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomoko_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.