#网友曝光 #开云体育 #全网通辑 黑平台 黑我会员两万八 本月拉到九游一个会员 打了20多万流水盈利两万八 被扣除盈利 投注全是五大联赛 我的代理线是这个月新注册的 会员这个流水和盈利加上注码也不大 说刷负的嫌疑应该不大 我看了一下会员的注单 没有小赛事 看起来普遍是2.0开外的水位 我想判定应该说我的会员打水吧 但是那是初盘呀 ob场馆普遍比其他场馆水位高这会员代理都知道 场馆盘口开的水位高还不准会员买了是吧 每单都是赛前下注 初盘打水 你打给我看 贵司做这么大 应该有一套检测会员是否打水套利的系统吧 请检查一下 这到底是打水还是说单纯的水位高 这到底是底下人为了个人业绩乱黑会员呢 还怎么样 公司老板这是做套吗 自营场馆把水拉高一点 一对比比分网 哦 比其他站赔率高一点嗷 这肯定是打水 要么是优势投注 那直接和完美一样得了呗.直接说黑了.还干嘛扯东扯西的 搞一些傻了吧唧的理由 一申诉还…

Channel
通缉•全网曝光 @TongJi
@tongji
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,044subscribers
-303 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002000736963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tongji |
| Description | 📌 永久ID #通缉 @TongJi 🌐 永久网址 DaPianZi.com 🔍 全网通缉|反诈曝光|骗子统计公布 🚨 紧急求助|跨国协查|线索情报收集 🕵️ 失联找人|寻亲互助|防骗提醒咨询 🧩 内幕披露|黑幕曝光|爆料内容发布 内容来自公开信息与用户匿名投稿 仅做风险提示,不作司法定性 你不一定会被通缉, 但所有异常行为, 都会被统计。 > 欢迎转发,共同守护安全,帮助更多人! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tongji |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 30,044 | -14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 30,058 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 30,068 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 30,075 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 30,079 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 30,103 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 30,117 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 30,124 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 30,138 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 30,145 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 30,164 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 30,176 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 30,186 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 30,192 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 30,199 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 30,204 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 30,211 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 30,218 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 30,219 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 30,229 | first reading |
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.127%
- avg views ÷ 30,044 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 38.3
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.61%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 162 (6 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,481 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 00:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,260
- Videos
- ≈76
- Links
- ≈48
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 32s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友曝光 #骗子 #通缉 @tongji 欠錢不還 曝光這條死狗 此騙子目前在柬埔寨,因為他沒錢吃飯,沒錢交房租,人家小女孩同情他。借他錢吃飯真是丟男人的臉上。?90u你都需要騙。曝光此騙子。如果身邊有認識他的請遠離這種垃圾。這種人這輩子也就這樣了。 騙子的飛機。 借錢時滿口誠意,一提還錢就像買了隱形斗篷,連90u都要騙的人!!! 難怪有人說:「錢借出去之前,是真朋友 借出去之後,就變成你單方面的客服中心。」至於那些喜歡用「誠意」當口頭禪的欠款大師們 小提醒一下: 遠離此騙子。 最後,也給受害者們一句話: 「心軟借出去的錢,就是拿來教會自己做人不能心軟。」對別人心軟,就是對自己殘忍😮💨 各位在海外辛苦工作的朋友,小心這個騙子,尤其是在柬埔寨的朋友們。 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 反诈曝光 骗子公布
#网友曝光 #星空体育 #全网通辑 星乐体育!本人注册几天小输了了点钱 刚打了3000回来结果连100都提不出,我玩平台娱乐八年黑了400+, 近期准备换平台娱乐 陆续充值一万+ 今天第二次提款100 狗代理居然已我的EB地址绑定了还多平台为由不出款,告知我是套利会员,我一直存款输钱我套你什么利?连我本金也吃了,现在的野鸡台子太多了,大家注意防范。钱不多但是恶心人。 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 环球娱乐
📣 必安担保|「赌牌 DuPai」正式上线 为进一步完善必安娱乐游戏生态,赌牌 @DuPai 游戏中心正式上线! 「赌牌 DuPai」由必安担保推出,面向游戏公群提供认证与持续监管,并集中展示已通过认证的游戏公群。 认证权益: ① 获得 DuPai 官方认证标识 ② 收录至赌牌 @DuPai 游戏中心 ③ 必安担保提供每月持续引流与曝光支持 ④ 认证状态持续公示与监督,确保公平|公正|透明 ⑤ 提供赌牌游戏周边配套服务,资源对接,如各国合法博彩牌照申请,包网系统对接,游戏供应商对接,支付通道对接等 申请认证:@CPDD 赌牌官方:@DuPai 赌牌 @DuPai 认证&监管 公平 · 公正 · 公开 · 透明 资金安全 长久稳定 信誉保障 DuPai 为必安担保旗下认证体系,非政府博彩牌照。
#网友曝光 #启航娱乐 #全网通辑 启航娱乐野鸡平台 大家擦亮双眼 开始的时候在真人赢了点就禁止玩家玩真人轮盘 现在又说国内ip原因不让出款 让点链接解除 可能是最近大扫荡改行做盗u了 外面的兄弟擦亮眼睛 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 启航娱乐
#网友曝光 #澳门六合彩 #全网通辑 骗子说有六合彩内部资料 1500u一个月成为高级VIP 每天9点10分发送内部资料6码 不中包赔 给了钱跟着买了2期都没有中 他们的vip内部群都是假的每天p图骗人连中十几期 大家不要被骗了 说好了不中包赔第二天找他直接给我拉黑了 我用另外一个号联系他 结果说1500u人名币享受1年VIP 被骗了认栽送他全家买棺材 希望大家注意 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 澳门六合彩
#网友曝光 #5A国际 #全网通辑 我从去年3月份开始玩这个台子 前后也输了30000多U吧 不知道现在是大环境不好还是怎么回事 这个平台的所有客服都是在玩套路你 修改个生日日期 要叫你提供转账记录 身份证 手持身份证号录屏 我都提供了 最后告诉我身份证不真实 我靠这不就是明显的套取个人信息吗 以前的钱包没使用了 我绑定了一个新的出款地址 出款3000多就不让出 故意挑一些你无法去证明的东西 请大家真的娱乐选择平台都要擦亮眼睛 现在平台各种套路 真的防不胜防 5A国际请大家避雷 赢了钱根本就会找各种理由不让出款 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 5A国际
#网友曝光 #新币担保 #皇冠担保 #全网通辑 本人实名曝光PAIEx平台,该APP还能在苹果应用商店搜到上架。一开始平台兑付、提现功能都可以正常操作,让人放松警惕。 9月14日,我在平台发起兑付,转出到TRC20链。转账页面显示付款成功,USDT已经打到平台钱包地址。 但资金一转过去,平台立刻以触发风控、资金来源审查为由,一直不到账。 我连续联系平台客服,申请把资金退回我的原账户PAI资产里,反复沟通超过48小时。客服话术永远固定:已经提交资料、等待风控审核、无法马上解除限制,只会无限拖延,不给明确处理时间。 我去区块链浏览器查询这笔交易链上记录,发现USDT一旦打到平台钱包地址,平台第一时间就把这笔币转走了,根本不是冻结暂扣,资金已经被平台转移。 提醒各位广大用户,平台可能跑路,典型的割韭菜,吃像难看,超级难看,典型的杀猪盘套路。如果一周内不解决,我们将曝光老板和股东的照片和身份信息。 全网通缉 @TongJi…
#网友曝光 #PAIEX #全网通辑 本人实名曝光PAIEx平台,该APP还能在苹果应用商店搜到上架。一开始平台兑付、提现功能都可以正常操作,让人放松警惕。 9月14日,我在平台发起兑付,转出到TRC20链。转账页面显示付款成功,USDT已经打到平台钱包地址。 但资金一转过去,平台立刻以触发风控、资金来源审查为由,一直不到账。 我连续联系平台客服,申请把资金退回我的原账户PAI资产里,反复沟通超过48小时。客服话术永远固定:已经提交资料、等待风控审核、无法马上解除限制,只会无限拖延,不给明确处理时间。 我去区块链浏览器查询这笔交易链上记录,发现USDT一旦打到平台钱包地址,平台第一时间就把这笔币转走了,根本不是冻结暂扣,资金已经被平台转移。 提醒各位广大用户,平台可能跑路,典型的割韭菜,吃像难看,超级难看,典型的杀猪盘套路。如果一周内不解决,我们将曝光老板和股东的照片和身份信息。 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台…
#网友曝光 #海鸥体育 #全网通辑 工作人员以帮忙出币名义骗取会员70000eb 冻结一年多老客户账号 不让提款 居然找个刷子理由就可以拿走客户eb 中间到底谁在中饱私囊 海鸥领导不管管吗 可笑希望平台给出一个合理解释 并且解冻账号余额 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 海鸥体育
#网友曝光 #旺博娱乐 #全网通辑 不作为 之前号里有901u 汇旺也是他们叫我用的 现在钱已经充值到他们旺博里面 不承认有这钱 我也有id账号 他们就是不给 以后大家注意这黑台子 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 平台曝光 旺博娱乐
#网友曝光 #骗子 #通缉 @tongji 曝光一个骗子,大家交易一定要小心! 对方是卖微信账号的,之前跟他交易,我已经把钱转过去了,结果钱收到以后却一直不发货 当时聊天记录我已经删除了,所以现在手上的证据不是很完整,但转账记录这些还是有保留。大家如果遇到类似的卖家,真的要特别小心, ⚠️也提醒大家,交易之前一定要确认清楚对方身份,保留好聊天记录、收款账号、转账记录等证据。 遇到这种情况不要抱着“再给一点钱就能拿到”的想法,很可能只会越陷越深。 希望大家看到后提高警惕,避免再有人被骗。 全网通缉 @TongJi 🚨 反诈曝光 骗子公布
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @tongji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“通缉•全网曝光 @TongJi” (@tongji), 30,044 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tongji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.