Channel
@toofaneyazd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,204subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001002436825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @toofaneyazd |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/toofaneyazd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 10,204 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 10,211 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 10,213 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:28 | 10,210 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 10,203 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 10,204 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 10,205 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 10,204 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 10,206 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 10,199 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 10,196 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 10,192 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 10,195 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 10,194 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 10,189 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 10,183 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 10,181 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 10,178 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 10,179 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 10,176 | first reading |
511 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 380 of 397 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 511 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 316,298 |
| Reactions total | 6,018 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,718 reactions across 471 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 2,085 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 1,611 | 20.9% | |
| 🤬 | 1,446 | 18.7% | |
| 😢 | 772 | 10.0% | |
| 👎 | 541 | 7.01% | |
| ❤ | 526 | 6.82% | |
| 👏 | 506 | 6.56% | |
| 🤔 | 231 | 2.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 491 of the 511 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,092 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 511 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جدول زمانبندی ساعات قطع برق استان یزد ( شنبه ۷ شهریور ) ساعت ۹ تا ۱۱ = گروه ۷ ۱۰ تا ۱۲ = گروه ۸ ۱۱ تا ۱۳ = گروه ۹ و ۲۱ ۱۲ تا ۱۴ = گروه ۱۰ و ۲۲ ۱۳ تا ۱۵ = گروه ۱ ۱۴ تا ۱۶ = گروه ۲ ۱۵ تا ۱۷ = گروه ۳ ۱۶ تا ۱۸ = گروه ۴ ۱۷ تا ۱۹ = گروه ۵ ۱۸ تا ۲۰= گروه ۶ تبصره اول: گروه ۲۰ و ۲۱ گروه کشاورزی است ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
🤬10
پیام شهروندان من خودم توی ورزشگاه حضور داشتم و سوالهای زیادی توی ذهنم شکل گرفت مثلاً چرا ما یزدیها یاد نگرفتیم تیم خودمون رو تشویق کنیم و طرفدار تیم چادرملوی اردکان باشیم تماشاگر های ما هنگام تشویق فراموش میکنند تماشاگر چادرملو هستند و یهو یاد تیم سنتی خودشون یعنی استقلال و پرسپولیس می افتند و فحاشیشون رو بر اساس طرفداری تیم پایتخت به تیم مقابل ابراز میکنند، ما باید یاد بگیریم وقتی به ورزشگاه شهید نصیری یزد میرویم طر…
👍4😁1
اطلاعیه باشگاه تراکتور درباره اتفاقات ورزشگاه شهید نصیری یزد شکایت تراکتوریها از چادرملو *باشگاه تراکتور با صدور اطلاعیهای، تمامی مستندات مربوط به اتفاقات رخداده در ورزشگاه شهید نصیری یزد، از جمله اهانت به بازیکنان و خانوادههای اعضای تیم، توهین به هواداران تراکتور، پرتاب اشیاء و سایر حواشی این دیدار را جمعآوری کرده و قصد دارد از باشگاه میزبان به کمیته انضباطی شکایت کند. *سید حجت کریمی مدیرعامل باشگاه تراکتور ض…
🤬8👍3❤2😁1
پزشکیان: بنابرقولی که داده بودیم، باید مبلغ کالابرگ را متناسب با افزایش نرخ ارز افزایش میدادیم، اما نتوانستیم این کار را انجام دهیم. در این زمینه از مردم عزیزمان شرمندهایم همین؟! ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
🤬13
تعطیلی ادارات چقدر به نفع دولت و ملت است؟! اینکه پزشکیان گفت، یعنی چه؟! پزشکیان: در همین دوره جنگ، بسیاری از ادارات تعطیل بودند؛ آیا مردم با مشکل جدی مواجه شدند؟ خیر. پس میتوانیم این کار را انجام دهیم، بدون اینکه حقوق کارکنانمان را کاهش دهیم. از سوی دیگر، مصرف بنزین، گاز، برق و سایر هزینهها را نیز کاهش خواهیم داد. ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁13😢1
همه ورزشگاه فحش دادند؛ خداداد عزیزی: یک کتاب ناظر بازی نوشت ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
دارن فحش ناموس میدهند! بحث و درگیری لفظی خداداد عزیزی با خبرنگاران در میکسدزون ورزشگاه نصیری این کدام خبرنگار بود که با عزیزی بنام خبرنگار یزدی بحث و گفتگو و سوال می کرد؟! ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
👍3
چه خبرها بوده باز امشب در ورزشگاه شهید نصیری؟! فحش ناموس تشویق کردنه؟ خداداد عزیزی: کاش دروغ استخوان میداشت! کاش دیروز چادرملو گل نمیآورد ترابی را چرا فحش دادید؟ بیام جلوی خونت فحش ناموس بدم چیکار میکنی؟ ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁4👍2
پزشکیان: مسیرها بسته است و کالا وارد نمیشود. یکی از این کالاها بنزین است. درآمد ما هم کاهش یافته؛ یعنی علاوه بر بنزینی که تولید میکنیم، باید بنزین بخریم. در نتیجه، حتی اگر مسیر باز باشد، باید پول خرید آن را نیز داشته باشیم. ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁16🤬3👍1
پزشکیان: کاهش مصرف از راهکارهای اصلی مدیریت مساله بنزین است *روزانه ۲ میلیون ماشین وارد تهران میشود و برمیگردد؛ اگر کارمندان ما در اداره مربوطه در شهر خود بمانند، کسری بنزین جبران میشود. *طرحی داریم که با کمک شهری کارمندان هفتهای یک روز با حملونقل عمومی در محل کار حاضر شوند. ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁20🤬4👍1
پزشکیان: اگر آمریکا تعهدات خود در زمینه رفع تحریم و محاصره و آزادسازی داراییها را انجام دهد، سرمایهگذاری را شروع کند و جنگ در لبنان را تمام کند ماهم تنگه هرمز را باز میکنیم *با آمدن آقای محسن رضایی نگاهها در حوزه دیپلماسی به هم نزدیک میشود. ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁27🤔2❤1
پزشکیان: واقعیت اینه که ما پول نداریم، درآمدمون هم که مشخصه، کمتر شده بیشتر نشده، مشکلاتمون هم بیشتر شده، در ضمن باید جواب هم پس بدهیم ✅توفان یزد @Toofaneyazd
😁23🤬7
Showing the 12 most recent of 511 posts we hold for @toofaneyazd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@toofaneyazd edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توفان یزد” (@toofaneyazd), 10,204 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toofaneyazd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.