Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гненный Андрей

Channel

Гненный Андрей

@tool_story

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,525subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652617506
TypeChannel
Username@tool_story
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tool_story

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5202,5252,522.56 August 2026 — 2,520 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,520 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,523 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,524 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,525 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,524 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,523 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,525 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,519–2,526 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:212,525+2
14 Sept 2026, 14:362,523-1
11 Sept 2026, 02:562,524-1
6 Sept 2026, 02:592,525+1
1 Sept 2026, 14:362,524+1
26 Aug 2026, 17:032,523+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:172,522+1
19 Aug 2026, 23:342,521+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:072,520-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:172,521+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:482,520first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8724.7%
😁8323.6%
🔥6217.6%
🤔4613.1%
👏298.24%
🤬215.97%
😱82.27%
😎30.852%
🤓20.568%
🤡20.568%
🤷‍♂20.568%
🥱20.568%
10.284%
👌10.284%
💯10.284%
🤩10.284%
🥰10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tool_story. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC307 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Из всего что показали, мне почему-то интереснее всего новая погружая пила.

👏9👍3🔥2💯1

7 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC305 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Многие инструментальные каналы выкладывают видео с блогерского мероприятия DEWALT. Кто обратили внимание на новый логотип PIT на очках DeWALT? Коллаборация? 😁

😁9🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC333 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Виктор Леонтьев вернулся на Ютуб!!!! Для тех, кто не знает кто он Вот его сайт https://eksmast.ru/video-vnekursovoe Вот его рутуб https://rutube.ru/channel/24202111 А этого, собственно, Ютуб https://youtu.be/2StghciGN7k?si=Rr4K01ot1QK0cOCC Настоятельно рекомендую для тех, кто интересуется металлообработкой или, хотя бы хочет научится затачивать сверла.

🔥5👏3

6 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC471 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Работает Юра Цой. Ламед, Казахстан.

🔥12👏3👍2🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC467 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что-то я упустил. А Шринкфляция в герметиках давно? Сегодня покупал и обратил внимание, что при внешне одинаковой тубе и одинаковом заявленном объеме разное положение пробки.

🤔13🤬8🥱2

5 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC620 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Идея для теста 😁

🤬13😱8😎3

4 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC717 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Бош переизобрёл патрон перфоратора.

👍17🔥9👏4🤷‍♂2🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC712 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю зачем вам это, но мне показалось забавным. У китайцев ругать, мама и управлять в составе имеют иероглиф лошадь.

🤔12😁7🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC908 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

А ещё, в руках профессионала это музыкальный инструмент. Строительная волынка! 🤣

😁18🔥3👏2

31 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC884 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня узнал, что цепную пилу изобрел медик. Инструмент назвали остеотома. Изобретателя звали Бернхард Гейне. Сделал он это в 1830 году.

👍20🔥7👏3👌1🤔1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 03:46 UTC935 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

SBD (Stanley Black and Decker) это DeWALT, Stanley, Black and Decker и многое другое. Брал данные только по инструментальным направлениям. Так вот, выручка во втором квартале гг практически без изменений, (3.56 млрд. что на 3% выше 2кв. 2025.), но при этом рост маржи с (8% до 11.8%.). Всего, за полгода 2026, в инструменте 6.9 млрд., а в целом по компании 7.81. Как и в Маките, более высокие темпы роста прибыли, объя

👍10🔥2👏1

30 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC811 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Про батареи, о которых писал ранее. По просьбе товарища попробовал подобрать что-то недорогое. Эти батареи. Они показали 3.5 Ач и посадку напряжения до 16В при потреблении 10А. В общем дрянь редкостная написал отзыв оформил возврат. Возврат одобрили, продавец под моим отзывом предлагает скидку в полцены за хороший отзыв.

😁25👍5🤓2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tool_story. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

papakarlotools
@papakarlotoolsru · 40,661
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
Будни сантехника 😉
@budnisantehnlka · 32,368
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гненный Андрей” (@tool_story), 2,525 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tool_story.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.