7KLLQATT
β€27π15π₯4π3

Channel
@topcoinbox
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
8,777subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001927685279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topcoinbox |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topcoinbox |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 8,777 | -53 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 8,830 | -45 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:54 | 8,875 | -19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 8,894 | -44 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 8,938 | -34 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 8,972 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 8,984 | -39 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 9,023 | -36 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 9,059 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 9,073 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 9,096 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 9,097 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 9,097 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
987 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 421 | 42.7% | |
| π | 387 | 39.2% | |
| π | 75 | 7.60% | |
| π₯ | 34 | 3.44% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 12 | 1.22% | |
| π | 12 | 1.22% | |
| π₯° | 10 | 1.01% | |
| β‘ | 7 | 0.709% | |
| β | 5 | 0.507% | |
| π | 5 | 0.507% | |
| π | 4 | 0.405% | |
| π | 4 | 0.405% | |
| π€· | 4 | 0.405% | |
| π | 3 | 0.304% | |
| π | 3 | 0.304% | |
| π | 1 | 0.101% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 987 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7KLLQATT
β€27π15π₯4π3
WQN4QRKV
β€27π20π₯5π2
F3IV8L00
π25β€13π8β‘4
ZRQS1VZX
π30β€17π6
X2DTGIDL
β€32π12π3π1π1
Binance WOTD answers 3οΈβ£ BUY 4οΈβ£ FORM, SELL 5οΈβ£ STOCK, TRADE 6οΈβ£ EXPAND, LAUNCH, MARKET, RATHER, VOLUME 7οΈβ£ JOURNEY, WITHOUT 8οΈβ£ EXPOSURE, MULTIPLE TopCoin β¬ οΈ
β€9π₯5π3
EPNPCJ7X
β€βπ₯12π10π6β€4π4π2β1
LLAB4442
β€25π12π6π3
VYTW6082
β€25π20π₯5π2
ED6MK30P
β€28π11π9π₯6π1
Binance WOTD answers 4οΈβ£ CODE, DATA 5οΈβ£ AGENT, BUILD, CHAIN, SKILL 6οΈβ£ DIRECT, MARKET 7οΈβ£ ECONOMY, PAYMENT, PREMIUM, PROTECT, SERVICE 8οΈβ£ APPROVAL, PROTOCOL TopCoin β¬ οΈ
β€13π8
PPFFJTNS
β€20π18π2π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @topcoinbox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ±TopCoinπ±β (@topcoinbox), 8,777 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topcoinbox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.