Признаюсь честно , не знаю правильно ли я делаю , что свечу этот цвет до анонса ❤️Но, это просто разрыв и гордость ! Именно такой цвет найти было не просто ❤️🤌🏼Не бледный , не яркий - тот самый идеальный 🥹❤️🩹
🔥20❤6💘3🥰1

Channel
@topoeva_olesya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,992subscribers
+1,731 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001728461323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topoeva_olesya |
| Description | ✨На этом канале вы найдете максимум полезной информации о моде , стиле, красоте . ✨Мои стильные находки ✨Ежедневные актуальные подборки для вдохновения ✨ общение , нетворкинг. ✨ разборы #WQO2F |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topoeva_olesya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 32,992 | -92 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 33,084 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 33,108 | +59 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 33,049 | +1,934 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 31,115 | -72 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 31,187 | -21 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 31,208 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 31,233 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:27 | 31,265 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 31,287 | +61 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 31,226 | +55 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 31,171 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 31,178 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 31,209 | -67 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 31,276 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 31,271 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 31,281 | +80 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 31,201 | +57 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 31,144 | +72 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 31,072 | first reading |
67 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (22 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 132,566 |
| Reactions total | 5,861 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,717 reactions across 66 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,645 | 30.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,064 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 2,017 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 819 | 9.40% | |
| 🥰 | 252 | 2.89% | |
| 💘 | 197 | 2.26% | |
| 🎉 | 153 | 1.76% | |
| 🤩 | 131 | 1.50% | |
| ⚡ | 82 | 0.941% | |
| 👏 | 77 | 0.883% | |
| 🤗 | 72 | 0.826% | |
| 🦄 | 64 | 0.734% | |
| 💔 | 30 | 0.344% | |
| 😍 | 23 | 0.264% | |
| custom 5276333513153479517 | 20 | 0.229% | |
| custom 5334624139279883059 | 15 | 0.172% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 0.172% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 0.126% | |
| 😘 | 10 | 0.115% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.08% | |
| 5 further kinds | 13 | 0.149% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,717 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @topoeva_olesya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Признаюсь честно , не знаю правильно ли я делаю , что свечу этот цвет до анонса ❤️Но, это просто разрыв и гордость ! Именно такой цвет найти было не просто ❤️🤌🏼Не бледный , не яркий - тот самый идеальный 🥹❤️🩹
🔥20❤6💘3🥰1
Сегодня были на производстве и знаете что ? Новый дроп свитшотов выйдет уже на грядущей неделе - думаю +1 числа🤌🏼 Из новостей - будет 5 цветов : 2 абсолютно новых , особенных и неповторимых. 1 тот , который вы больше всего просили и 2 любимых базы : серый и шоколад 🤌🏼 После производства захотелось их красиво поснимать и … ( спасибо моему супругу) мы уже в любимом Геленджике 🤌🏼❤️ Поэтому презентация новых свитшотов…
❤12👍6🔥5
ДЕВОЧКИ, срочноооо! ❤️🩹 Ондар выпустили бомберы и цена на них всего 5.000₽ ! Скорее забирать , даже не думать ! Потому что они идеальны 🤌🏼 🔘 лучшая посадка , а вы знаете , что у меня их было много ! 🔘цвета - шикарная база ! 🔘 качество - как всегда топ , мы все с вами знаем ОНДАР ! 🔘 размеры до 50! ( но я бы и на 52 спокойно померила) 🔘на подкладке 🔘 замша , которая выглядит по-настоящему дорого ! В этом видео - г…
👍17❤10🔥6🥰2
Девочки , сегодня у меня день красоты и вы только посмотрите , что пришло из новинок Оксаны Утовой ❤️ Я очень много раз говорила , что для меня этот бренд - открытие ! Хороший размерный ряд ( даже более чем), нетривиальные модели и по-настоящему роскошный дизайн ! Сегодня о верхней одежде ⬇️ https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/760308474/detail.aspx - кожаная куртка https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/1310327815/de…
👍37❤16🔥2😱2💘1
Ну это что за красота у нас сегодня 🥹❤️🩹Каждый раз когда у Цацек выходят новинки , я пытаюсь себя оставить , но … НЕ МОГУ! Потому что это лучшие украшения , проверенные временем и лично мной ! 1️⃣ Подвеска зеркальная - https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/1542550982/detail.aspx?size=2404249797 2️⃣ Чокер зеркальный - https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/1542526042/detail.aspx?size=2404199918 3️⃣ Чокер сердечки - https…
❤🔥36👍12❤11🔥4💘3💋2💯1😍1
Бережно напоминаю, что осенний шопинг -гид уже вышел 🍂 И в этом сезоне это не просто более 700 ссылок на топовые вещи - это еще и ⬇️ 📍 3 готовых капсулы со ссылками и готовыми образами на ее основе 📍Мужской журнал с готовыми образами 📍20 готовых образов со ссылками Ииии🥁 Мои обучающие мастер-классы! ( кстати , с одним из них меня пригласили выступать , как спикера на слете врачей , боюсь даже озвучить ганорар , а в…
🔥27❤10💘2💔1
Ну какая же у нас сегодня красота ! ❤️Я много раз говорила о том , что это идеальные базовые вещи , которые всегда актуальны и нужны в каждом гардеробе 🤌🏼 Важное об этом бренде : ✅размеры до 56 ✅ собственное производство ✅ плотная добротная ткань ✅ ценаааа сказка ! Обязательно гляньте ❤️ Ссылочки ⬇️ 📍Пиджак https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/279297104/detail.aspx 📍Жилет https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/27929768…
❤56🔥17💘6👍4👏2🥰1
BEAUTY день на канале или мой лучший утренний лифтинг уход ! ❤️🩹 Сегодня покажу свои любимые хиты и новинки , которые обязательно нужно попробовать ! 🤌🏼 1️⃣ Сыворотка для век в капсулах Уникальность в том , что она содержит экстракт акмеллы, по-другому называют ее «растительный ботокс». 2️⃣ Бальзам для губ с PDRN ( можно использовать как самостоятельное средство, можно как базу под помаду, а можно как ночную мас…
❤🔥17❤9👍7💘2🤩1
Образы с джинсами на осень 🍂, которые выглядят эффектно и стильно 🤌🏼 За основу этого видео я взяла свои любимые , которые вы уже видели , но они настолько шикарны , что хочется говорить и показывать их бесконечно ! Делюсь ссылочками ⤵️ Джинсы подворот клетка 🌟https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/994212598/detail.aspx Джинсы с узором серые 🌟https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/993943780/detail.aspx Джинсы краски серы…
👍44❤21🔥9💘3
Девочки , всех поздравляю ! ❤️🩹Сегодня в течении дня свяжусь со всеми , запрошу адрес для отправки подарочка ❤️🩹🤌🏼
❤46🔥12💘3🆒1
Posted without readable text
❤42🔥8🤗3🍾1🥰1
Cartier и браслет с Вб на одной руке , вы что с ума сошли ?🫣 Не так давно получила такой комментарий и очень хочу высказаться на эту тему. Именно с помощью аксессуаров мы задаем полноценной картинке настроение ! Но очень многие боятся их использовать , аргументируя как правило следующими словами : «Я боюсь переборщить», «Я не умею сочетать», «Не умею выбирать актуальные». Аксессуары - это та самая часть образа , …
👍44❤🔥27❤15🔥8😘2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @topoeva_olesya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Топоева Олеся. Стиль. Мода. Тренды. Вдохновение.” (@topoeva_olesya), 32,992 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topoeva_olesya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.