Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.0%
- avg views ÷ 378 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 79.5
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 8.18%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 534
- Videos
- 270
- Links
- 525
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 24s
- Average length
- 1m 42s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
25 Sept 2026, 21:37 UTC29 views7 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Que o Eterno traga a cada um de nós, a noção de que somos completamente dependentes dEle, que até aqui o Eterno nos ajudou, que nossa habitação (nossos corpos) são tão temporais quanto esta terra mas que logo estaremos juntos do nosso Machiach que habitará conosco!
Chag Sukot Sameach!!!
❤7
3 Sept 2026, 02:36 UTC130 views6 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Video
Micha ensina como guardar o Shabat segundo a Lei.
“..combinar de ante-mão com um gentio para carregar o menino deficiente..”
O que diz a Lei:
“Mas o sétimo dia é o sábado do Adonai, teu Elohim; não farás nenhuma obra nele, nem tu, nem teu filho, nem tua filha, nem o teu servo, nem a tua serva, nem o teu boi, nem o teu jumento, nem animal algum teu, nem o estrangeiro que está dentro de tuas portas; para que o teu s…
❤6
23 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC233 views0 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Photo
http://youtube.com/post/UgkxuUlidobO2B4H-34K6VCBkIK6A1B3KXx4?si=gLIRmSjVM1xzfl4b
13 Jun 2026, 00:17 UTC288 views4 reactionsread 26 September 2026 https://youtu.be/e0FRVcwWNi0?is=XTnpLfS82WOB-Bvl
❤4
13 Jun 2026, 00:16 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Foram 900 decolagem e pousos feitos em segurança.
O “não-piloto que se sentia piloto” tinha tanta experiência e competência quanto um piloto que passou pelo “Beit Din”.
Claro, não estou aqui dizendo que concordo com falsificação, por isso não me declaro judeu e não ensino práticas judaicas. Mas convenhamos que é sim possível alguém buscar viver Torah sem ter que passar por um processo de conversão. Primeiro que o p…
👍4
13 Jun 2026, 00:09 UTC220 viewsread 26 September 2026 Photo
Ouvi alguém dizer aí que não se pode ser piloto de avião sem passar pelo “processo de conversão oficial”. Será?
O ex-piloto canadense Geoffrey Wall foi preso pela polícia do Canadá após comandar cerca de 900 voos comerciais da Air Canada ao longo de 17 anos utilizando uma licença falsificada.
A fraude foi descoberta durante uma checagem de rotina no Aeroporto Internacional Pearson, em Toronto, resultando no afastam…
4 Jun 2026, 23:08 UTC199 viewsread 26 September 2026 https://youtube.com/shorts/lNF_fgkJ1Bc?si=2-1gNJdp9gXcFZv6
3 Jun 2026, 09:20 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Bnei Noach, Bnei nada, Bananada.
Tudo começa ao negar Yeshua como a própria manifestação do Eterno.
No Tanach, o Eterno declara repetidamente que Israel é sua esposa. Textos como Jeremias 31:32, Isaías 54:5 e Oséias apresentam YHWH como o marido de Israel, aquele que estabeleceu uma aliança matrimonial com seu povo. Sempre assim: Israel é a noiva/esposa, e o Eterno é o esposo. Ao ler todo o Tanach, esta é forma da…
❤3✍2👎1
13 May 2026, 00:23 UTC257 views0 reactionsread 26 September 2026 https://youtu.be/0XDDeEEdirc?si=eUiRTOEy4yKUA3YH
2 May 2026, 12:10 UTC293 viewsread 26 September 2026 Photo
Shabbat Shalom!
Logo estaremos ao vivo com excelentes estudos para tua manha de Shabbat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV6Vanodf8Y
24 Feb 2026, 16:56 UTC414 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kYtYdu4KIAk
❤8
21 Feb 2026, 12:58 UTC400 views0 reactionsread 26 September 2026 Photo
Shabbat Shalom!!!
Live as 10h (mas sempre atrasamos... sem pressa no Shabbat... 😂)
https://youtube.com/live/3pHZHFS9l1A?feature=share
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @torah_lechem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lightroom Mobile Presets
@lightroommobilepresets1905 · 20,628
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 September 2026 This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alimento de Verdade - את” (@torah_lechem), 378 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/torah_lechem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.