Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тортомастер — всё для выпечки

Channel

Тортомастер — всё для выпечки

@tortomaster

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22,539subscribers

-319 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001114420904
TypeChannel
Username@tortomaster
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/tortomaster

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,53922,85822,698.57 August 2026 — 22,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,857 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,843 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,840 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,837 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,832 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,828 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,821 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,813 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,795 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,788 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,783 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,773 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,752 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,742 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,735 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,727 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,726 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,724 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,719 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,712 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,711 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,703 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,701 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,688 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,679 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,655 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,648 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,642 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,636 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,622 subscribers28 September 2026 — 22,623 subscribers5 October 2026 — 22,612 subscribers9 October 2026 — 22,600 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,582 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,576 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,572 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,567 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,564 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,562 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,559 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,555 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,551 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,549 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,547 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,543 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,539 subscribers7 August 202626 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net -319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,491–22,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 11:5022,539-4
25 Oct 2026, 09:4922,543-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:5022,547-2
23 Oct 2026, 05:3122,549-2
22 Oct 2026, 02:2922,551-4
20 Oct 2026, 23:2722,555-4
19 Oct 2026, 18:4822,559-3
18 Oct 2026, 20:4722,562-2
17 Oct 2026, 21:4922,564-3
16 Oct 2026, 20:3422,567-5
15 Oct 2026, 20:2822,572-4
14 Oct 2026, 22:4722,576-6
13 Oct 2026, 14:2122,582-18
9 Oct 2026, 15:5422,600-12
5 Oct 2026, 05:5422,612-11
28 Sept 2026, 19:0022,623+1
17 Sept 2026, 20:5822,622-14
15 Sept 2026, 18:5522,636-6
14 Sept 2026, 04:5822,642-6
12 Sept 2026, 13:1722,648first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.33%
avg views ÷ 22,539 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held36 (6 July 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total11,566
Reactions total199
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 15s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,320 reactions across 36 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤51138.7%
🔥28521.6%
😁846.36%
🤣836.29%
❤‍🔥634.77%
👍574.32%
🤔503.79%
🤩423.18%
😱382.88%
👎312.35%
🎉292.20%
👀141.06%
😍80.606%
🤷‍♀80.606%
💯70.53%
🤡40.303%
🤯20.152%
🥰20.152%
👌10.076%
🗿10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2026, 16:24 UTC716 views39 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Так и живем🤣🤣🤣

😁22❤10💯7

13 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Poll

Как относитесь к Хэллоуину 🧛🎃👻

  1. Мне нравится, пеку сама и лайкаю чужие❤️‍🔥24%
  2. Сама не пеку такие, но нравятся17%
  3. Вообще терпеть не могу18%
  4. Как-то пофиг просто на него😅46%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤10

12 Oct 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,520 views8 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

У всех пап скоро праздник🫶 18 октября — День ОТЦА! Напоминаем, что сделать съедобную печать можно у нас в магазинах. Правила по печати простые. О них мы писали здесь! На выбор сахарная и вафельная бумага! Мы рекомендуем сахарную🙌

❤8

9 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,760 views29 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Несправедливо недолюбленная всеми форма — ложки! Как-то у нас её брали для декора на первый зубик в подарок родителям. А она просто идеальна к кофе или вечернему какао. Ну и прекрасно представляем такое платное дополнение к напиткам в кофейнях☕️ Ссылка на форму

❤18👍9🔥2

7 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,560 views39 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Полезное на ночь: Представим, что фольгу похитили инопланетяне и приходится выкручиваться 🛸🐄🎂 На видео происходит некое «пергаментоплетение», которое спасет в непредвиденной ситуации.

❤22🤔12🔥5

5 Oct 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,720 views47 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Photo

Как наступила осень и жизнерадостные цветочки уступили место настоящей готике🗡️🏰🧛 Как вам такой декор?

🤩15❤14👀9😁4👍2😍2🗿1

28 Sept 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,690 views27 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Ничего необычного, просто кандидаты на самый уродливый торт😁 В Штатах прошло интересное соревнование, где побеждает далеко не красивейший. Уверены выбор был сложный, один краше другого. Есть все-таки тенденция на треш-торты (нам нравится🥹) Как думаете у нас такой конкурс зайдет?

🤩12🤷‍♀6👎4😁4❤1

23 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,310 views46 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Новое поколение придумывает новые традиции👀 Интерактивам обычно подверженны гендерные торты, но новое поколение = новые правила Самое время пообсуждать перфоманс. Что думаете? Задуваем свечи или пришло время для чего-то новенького?

👎19🔥11🤔8❤5❤‍🔥1👌1🤡1

21 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈2,200 views43 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Ну просто идеальная компания к чаю: батончик «шоколад-печенье» 🍫🍪 Новый гибрид от осенней хандры станет хитом этого сезона 🫶 Рецепт печенья: 250 г сливочного масла комнатной температуры 1 стакан коричневого сахара 3 ст. л. сахарного песка 1 яйцо + 1 яичный желток комнатной температуры ванильная паста 2 1/4 стакана муки 1/4 ч. л. пищевой соды 1/2 ч. л. разрыхлителя 1 ст. л. кукурузного крахмала 1/2 ч. л. растворимог…

❤34👍8🤩1

16 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,400 views42 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Мы тут нашли, как сделать тирамису в полусфере👀 На наш взгляд это самый гибкий десерт из всех, что мы знаем. Мы видели дома из тирамису, шоколадки, и даже стаканчики. Если ещё нет полусферы — зря. Вот ссылка на формы🫶

❤31👍11

14 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,330 views52 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Мини мастер-класс «как закатать мармеладные помидорки» 🍅 Боже, какая это классная идея❤️‍🔥 100% эффектный подарок! Аплодисменты гениальному автору vegbuket_school💖

❤34👍9🤣6👎3

9 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,570 views35 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Тирамису начинает мимикрировать под дубайскую шоколадку👀 Как думаете, значит ли это, что нас скоро ждёт новый формат десерта-шоколада?

🔥21❤7❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @tortomaster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll203 voters

Как относитесь к Хэллоуину 🧛🎃👻

  1. Мне нравится, пеку сама и лайкаю чужие❤️‍🔥24%
  2. Сама не пеку такие, но нравятся17%
  3. Вообще терпеть не могу18%
  4. Как-то пофиг просто на него😅46%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тортомастер — всё для выпечки” (@tortomaster), 22,539 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tortomaster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.