Channel
@toutiao999
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,080subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001987035259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @toutiao999 |
| Created | 3 July 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/toutiao999 |
@toutiao999 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 1,080 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 1,079 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 1,082 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 1,090 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 1,090 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 3 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
102 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 52.0% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 9.80% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 3.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2023 to 8 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toutiao999. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2023 to 8 October 2023. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
避免官方封禁频道请关注： 头条事件官方导航 👇👇 头条事件永久ID（其他头条事件均为模仿盗版！请注意识别，防止被诈骗或敲诈勒索！） 头条事件⭐️ https://t.me/toutiaoshijian https://t.me/toutiao2 https://t.me/toutiao3 https://t.me/toutiao4 柬埔寨头条👍 https://t.me/eu666 头条事件聊天群 👇👇 https://t.me/toutiaoshequ 要点资讯，安危事件，曝光爆料，时事新闻，社会热点推送。 你的关心，才是头条。 商务爆料： @nb009
❤34👍16🔥9🖕4🥰3
避免官方封禁频道请关注： 头条事件官方频道 👇👇 https://t.me/toutiao2 https://t.me/toutiao3 https://t.me/anwei2 https://t.me/jinritoutiao6 头条事件聊天群 👇👇 https://t.me/toutiao0 要点资讯，安危事件，曝光爆料，时事新闻，社会热点推送。 你的关心，才是头条。 商务爆料： @nb009
❤13👍5🔥2
头条事件： @toutiao2 要点资讯，安危事件，曝光爆料，时事新闻，社会热点推送。 你的关心，才是头条。 商务爆料： @nb009
🥰7❤6👍3
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @toutiao999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@toutiao999 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“头条事件导航” (@toutiao999), 1,080 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toutiao999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.