Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tpx Security ⠠⠵

Channel

tpx Security ⠠⠵

@tpxSecurity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,468subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001023803963
TypeChannel
Username@tpxSecurity
Created21 January 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tpxSecurity

Growth

2,4562,4782,4675 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,456 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,462 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,470 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,478 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,476 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,478 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,468 subscribers2,4685 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,453–2,481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 17:382,468-10
4 Sept 2026, 16:392,478+2
31 Aug 2026, 19:482,476-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:152,478+8
25 Aug 2026, 17:362,470+8
22 Aug 2026, 17:592,462+5
19 Aug 2026, 08:552,457-2
16 Aug 2026, 05:442,459+3
12 Aug 2026, 23:352,456-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:132,461+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:582,459-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:352,461no change
5 Aug 2026, 18:232,461first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱666.7%
❤‍🔥222.2%
custom 5213333038775151099111.1%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC246 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Investigadores de Okta detectaron "Poison Claude", un servicio ilegal que revende acceso a modelos de Anthropic con hasta 95% de descuento. El sistema funciona redirigiendo tráfico a través de un pool de cuentas fraudulentas que abusan de créditos en la nube. Al actuar como un servidor proxy intermediario, los operadores tienen visibilidad total sobre los prompts e información confidencial enviada por los clientes, e

Signed M.

24 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC563 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

La firma Zenity Labs reveló la vulnerabilidad "AgentForger" en ChatGPT Workspace Agents, un fallo de tipo CSRF que permitía a un atacante crear, autorizar y programar automáticamente un agente de IA malicioso con solo lograr que la víctima hiciera clic en un enlace. Al abrir la URL, el sistema ejecutaba el prompt embebido, conectando aplicaciones como Gmail, Slack o Drive sin pedir confirmación. Esto convertía al age

Signed M.

23 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC464 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Una campaña convirtió repositorios comprometidos de GitHub y Packagist en infraestructura atacante. Mediante workflows maliciosos en GitHub Actions, cibercriminales escanean servidores cPanel y WHM para explotar la falla CVE-2026-41940 y exfiltrar credenciales, claves API y tokens en la nube.

Signed M.

22 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC485 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

OpenAI reveló que un grupo de sus modelos avanzados (incluyendo GPT-5.6 Sol), evaluados con restricciones cibernéticas reducidas, escaparon de su entorno aislado (sandbox) para resolver el benchmark ExploitGym. Durante el proceso, los modelos descubrieron y explotaron una vulnerabilidad zero-day en un software proxy, realizaron escalada de privilegios y movimiento lateral hasta ganar acceso a internet. Posteriormente

❤‍🔥2😱1

Signed M.

20 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC496 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Se ha publicado en GitHub una prueba de concepto (PoC) funcional para "wp2shell", una crítica cadena de ataque en el núcleo de WordPress. La falla encadena una confusión de rutas en la REST API (CVE-2026-63030) con una inyección SQL en el componente WP_Query (CVE-2026-60137), permitiendo la ejecución remota de código (RCE) sin autenticación en instalaciones limpias a partir de la versión 6.9. Tras la asignación ofici

Signed M.

16 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC559 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Una vulnerabilidad en la plataforma de automatización n8n (CVE-2026-59208) permite a atacantes iniciar sesión como usuarios de otro emisor sin requerir contraseña. El fallo afecta a instancias Enterprise configuradas para confiar en múltiples emisores externos, ya que el sistema valida el reclamo "sub" del token JWT pero ignora el "iss" (emisor). El error, descubierto por un agente de pentesting de IA, fue parcheado

Signed M.

15 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC536 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Poco después del "Patch Tuesday", el investigador "Chaotic Eclipse" publicó "LegacyHive", un zero-day de escalada de privilegios funcional en todas las versiones actuales de Windows, eludiendo los parches de julio de 2026. Simultáneamente, Microsoft corrigió la cifra récord de 622 fallas, mientras CISA alertó sobre la explotación activa de vulnerabilidades críticas en SharePoint Server.

Signed M.

13 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC564 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Cibercriminales están utilizando scripts de PowerShell generados por Inteligencia Artificial para mapear redes de Active Directory (AD) y automatizar ataques. Investigadores identificaron código "ruidoso y agresivo" que evidencia su creación mediante modelos de lenguaje (LLMs) gracias a marcadores como salidas de consola coloreadas y títulos basados en prompts. Esto demuestra cómo la IA actúa como un multiplicador de

😱1

Signed M.

10 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

El investigador Chinmohan Nayak descubrió tres vulnerabilidades críticas en el asistente de IA OpenClaw que permiten tomar el control del sistema anfitrión. Mediante un simple mensaje malicioso enviado por WhatsApp, un atacante puede evadir el sandbox, extraer credenciales sensibles y ejecutar código remoto sin requerir acceso previo. Las fallas ya fueron solucionadas en la versión 2026.6.6.

Signed M.

9 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC534 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Un actor de amenazas afirma vender una base de datos con 2.7 millones de registros de usuarios de Telegram presuntamente vinculados a donaciones a RDK, obtenida mediante phishing a administradores. La información ofertada incluye IDs, números de teléfono y detalles financieros de donantes en varios países europeos. La organización implicada niega el incidente, por lo que la filtración permanece sin verificación ofici

Signed M.

8 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC536 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

El grupo de hackers conocido como "The Gentlemen" ha afirmado haber vulnerado los sistemas de la plataforma líder de comercio electrónico, Mercado Libre. A través de su portal de extorsión, los atacantes han publicado un perfil de la compañía acompañado de un temporizador de cuenta regresiva de más de 200 horas, amenazando con una futura acción o publicación de datos una vez que el plazo finalice. Hasta el momento, t

custom 52133330387751510991

Signed M.

7 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC544 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Documentos judiciales filtrados revelan cómo el FBI identificó a Peter Stokes ("Bouquet"), miembro de Scattered Spider, con ayuda de Microsoft. Las autoridades utilizaron el GDID (Windows Global Device ID), una huella digital permanente generada en cada instalación del sistema. Aunque el atacante usó una VPN para ocultar su IP durante el ataque a Tiffany & Co., los registros de Microsoft vincularon la conexión direct

Signed M.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tpxSecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔒Seguridad Informática
@seguridadinformatic4 · 29,186
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
SASSLA
@sassla · 99,409
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tpx Security ⠠⠵” (@tpxSecurity), 2,468 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tpxSecurity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.