Live stream finished (10 minutes)

Channel
TR ZILANI.08๐ง๐ฉ
@traderzilani
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
84,934subscribers
+52,185 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001957530122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @alveefxofficial @traderzilani |
| Description | @tr_zilani08 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/traderzilani |
Topic
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:16 | 84,934 | -515 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 85,449 | -741 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 86,190 | -274 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:07 | 86,464 | -419 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:08 | 86,883 | -370 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 87,253 | -471 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 87,724 | -300 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:50 | 88,024 | -483 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 88,507 | -311 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 88,818 | -307 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 89,125 | -338 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 89,463 | -375 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:54 | 89,838 | -273 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 90,111 | -560 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 90,671 | -505 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 91,176 | -516 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 91,692 | -439 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:35 | 92,131 | -204 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 92,335 | -766 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 93,101 | first reading |
Engagement
1,754 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 0.804%
- avg views รท 84,934 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 683
- 785 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.4%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 804
- of 1,754 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 601 of 785 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,754 (4 August 2026 โ 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 536,370 |
| Reactions total | 62,531 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- โ1,150
- Videos
- โ18
- Links
- โ81
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 5 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 27s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
83,841 reactions across 756 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 10,316 | 12.3% | |
| ๐ | 10,179 | 12.1% | |
| ๐ | 9,395 | 11.2% | |
| ๐ฅ | 9,070 | 10.8% | |
| ๐ | 9,003 | 10.7% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 8,626 | 10.3% | |
| ๐คฉ | 8,318 | 9.92% | |
| ๐ฏ | 8,265 | 9.86% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 8,205 | 9.79% | |
| ๐ | 1,027 | 1.22% | |
| ๐ณ | 1,024 | 1.22% | |
| ๐ | 354 | 0.422% | |
| โก | 24 | 0.029% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 0.021% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.005% | |
| ๐ค | 4 | 0.005% | |
| ๐ค | 2 | 0.002% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.001% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.001% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 1 | 0.001% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.005% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 756 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 83,841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 21 of 804 posts held from the last 30 days (2.61%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐20โค19๐19๐18๐ณ15
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐ณ23๐19๐19โค17๐14
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐26๐ณ19๐19โค18๐11
Photo, posted without a caption
๐ณ21๐21๐19๐16โค14
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐23โค21๐18๐ณ16๐12
๐ MARKET : USD INR OTCโถ๏ธ ) ๐ฉ โก๏ธ Time : 1 MINUTE๐ ๐ฅ RISK : USE 2๐
๐22โค17๐ณ16๐15๐13
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐26๐20โค16๐ณ14๐14
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐21๐20๐ณ19โค15๐9
Sticker, posted without a caption
โค23๐23๐18๐ณ13๐13
Photo, posted without a caption
โค21๐ณ18๐16๐15๐10
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,754 posts we hold for @traderzilani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@traderzilani edited 7 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @traderzilani as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Signal dibo? Balance ache apnader?
- Ache bhai den75%
- Na bhai25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โTR ZILANI.08๐ง๐ฉโ (@traderzilani), 84,934 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/traderzilani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.