Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trade with Kedavi | KN Trading Community

Channel

Trade with Kedavi | KN Trading Community

@tradewithkedavi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,237subscribers

-3,120 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393679741
TypeChannel
Username@tradewithkedavi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradewithkedavi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,23713,35711,79719 August 2026 — 13,357 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,357 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,328 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,228 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,020 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,643 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,538 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,415 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,351 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,270 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,206 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,119 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,976 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,907 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,838 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,732 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,255 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,795 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,654 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,465 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,367 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,237 subscribers19 August 202617 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 29 days, net -3,120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,769–13,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:1910,237-130
15 Sept 2026, 15:2010,367-98
13 Sept 2026, 21:2110,465-189
12 Sept 2026, 02:1710,654-141
9 Sept 2026, 17:2010,795-460
6 Sept 2026, 09:4111,255-477
3 Sept 2026, 22:5911,732-106
2 Sept 2026, 10:3811,838-69
1 Sept 2026, 11:4611,907-69
31 Aug 2026, 13:0411,976-143
30 Aug 2026, 11:1712,119-42
29 Aug 2026, 14:2512,161-45
28 Aug 2026, 15:1112,206-64
27 Aug 2026, 12:4712,270-81
26 Aug 2026, 14:1712,351-64
25 Aug 2026, 15:2312,415-123
24 Aug 2026, 16:5712,538-105
23 Aug 2026, 04:0612,643-377
21 Aug 2026, 13:2413,020-208
20 Aug 2026, 14:0413,228first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 10,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held52 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total49,659
Reactions total2,206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,030 reactions across 51 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
83120.6%
👍80720.0%
🔥80620.0%
👏79819.8%
🎉76118.9%
🏆50.124%
🙏40.099%
30.074%
🕊30.074%
😁30.074%
🥰30.074%
💯20.05%
🤩20.05%
👌10.025%
😍10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC157 views79 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Remember how I got $375+ in the last campaign I shared with you?? Another opportunity is here to trade and earn more exciting rewards!!! 🚨 *1,400,000 $ZAMA PRIZE POOL IS UP FOR GRABS!* 🔥 Ready to trade and compete for your share? 👀 📈 Trade at least *500 USDT* in spot & futures to qualify. 🏆 *Top 10,000 traders* will receive rewards based on their trading volume and leaderboard position. 💰 The prize pool unlocks p

🔥2219👏15🎉12👍11

1 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC992 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026

The market has been hectic today.. no clear setups. Most of our scalp longs already hit Sl or are close to invalidation.. Btc is currently consolidating that is why.. will be waiting for a clearer direction before sharing any new trades

22👍16🔥15👏11🎉101

1 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,180 views69 reactionsread 2 September 2026

I’ve got some scalp trades for today.. sharing soon

👍18🔥1613👏13🎉9

1 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,220 views98 reactionsread 2 September 2026

We have a few open trades from yesterday.. and some orders yet to pick…

👍25🔥2119🎉18👏14👌1

1 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,180 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Gm traders

26🔥20👍19👏16🎉15🕊1

31 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,680 views90 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Fartcoin in profits 👍🏽

👍21🎉1918👏18🔥13😁1

31 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,700 views107 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Btc long scalp

25👍25🔥20🎉19👏17🥰1

31 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,680 views88 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Watching out for this on sol

👏22🔥2120🎉13👍11🕊1

31 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,940 views96 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

This order eventually picked… It’s running nicely .👍🏽

👍25🎉2119🔥19👏12

31 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,960 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Niulai long

👍23🎉19👏1918🔥17💯1

31 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈2,000 views92 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Fartcoin buy

23👏21👍18🎉15🔥15

30 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC≈2,070 views88 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Btc buy scalp

19👏19🔥19👍18🎉12💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @tradewithkedavi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tradewithkedavi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Techriz💯📈
@Techriztm · 46,321
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
TRADING ARENA
@kelvin_talent · 81,806
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trade with Kedavi | KN Trading Community” (@tradewithkedavi), 10,237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradewithkedavi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.