Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 88 days, net -2,585. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,329–47,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 22:26
44,717
-22
2 Nov 2026, 21:20
44,739
-10
1 Nov 2026, 20:27
44,749
-19
31 Oct 2026, 20:10
44,768
-18
30 Oct 2026, 17:28
44,786
-26
29 Oct 2026, 15:10
44,812
-40
28 Oct 2026, 15:47
44,852
-20
27 Oct 2026, 17:32
44,872
-32
26 Oct 2026, 20:00
44,904
-27
25 Oct 2026, 21:46
44,931
+4
24 Oct 2026, 21:06
44,927
-29
23 Oct 2026, 20:36
44,956
-28
22 Oct 2026, 18:21
44,984
-20
21 Oct 2026, 16:00
45,004
-30
20 Oct 2026, 09:40
45,034
-38
19 Oct 2026, 09:36
45,072
-18
18 Oct 2026, 11:29
45,090
-7
17 Oct 2026, 13:19
45,097
-22
16 Oct 2026, 09:49
45,119
-35
15 Oct 2026, 06:46
45,154
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈799
Links
≈1,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,067 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
485
45.5%
🔥
312
29.2%
👍
151
14.2%
🥰
41
3.84%
😁
26
2.44%
🤯
24
2.25%
👏
10
0.937%
😱
7
0.656%
💯
6
0.562%
👌
5
0.469%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BREAKING: SEBI may partly reverse its CAS rules
DETAILS INCLUDE:
Derivatives settlement expected to shift to last 30-minute VWAP
CAS for Derivatives may be stopped for at least 1 year
CAS may continue for less-liquid stocks
Changes could start by the end of Oct
Guys, for side hustle - check Xento ... free way to earn. Basically you just do easy social tasks (follows, RTs, invites etc) for points. Simple system:
•100% free – no deposits, no crypto, no wallet.
• Instant points – when you finish a quest.
• Weekly cash – top players share a real cash pool.
• Fair for all – leaderboard resets every Monday.
Just 10 seconds to sign up with just Google, Gmail or X.. My Affiliate …
Glitch sahi Live at 12:30 Sharp Expiry special Spike selling
👍14❤10🤯5🥰4🔥3😁2
Signed Prateek
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @tradewithprateek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FX_TRADING_01 @ffx_trading_01 · 45,453 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
MONEYVIEWS TRADE LIKE WOLF🐺 @MONEYVIEWSIN · 51,872 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Raiden Trading @raidentrading · 27,480 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
Stock Burner @stockburner_trading · 233,988 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Trader gupta @tradermannugupta · 83,975 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
BURNER - CRYPTO MARKET @stockburner_crypto · 219,037 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 6 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade With Prateek Sahni” (@tradewithprateek), 44,717 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradewithprateek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.