Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trade with Miishann

Channel

Trade with Miishann

@tradewuthmiishann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

556subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001626080518
TypeChannel
Username@tradewuthmiishann
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradewuthmiishann

Growth

539556547.54 September 2026 — 539 subscribers4 September 2026 — 539 subscribers5 September 2026 — 550 subscribers14 September 2026 — 556 subscribers4 September 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 536–559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 03:38556+6
5 Sept 2026, 23:17550+11
4 Sept 2026, 10:22539no change
4 Sept 2026, 09:47539first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 556 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total789
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1270.6%
👍529.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC76 viewsread 4 September 2026

https://us05web.zoom.us/j/88208516067?pwd=4ajCkA21NXmJCaM0VQK5fVDpR2HRNJ.1

1 Sept 2026, 18:26 UTC91 viewsread 4 September 2026

Michelle khoza is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: Michelle khoza's Zoom Meeting Time: Sep 1, 2026 08:30 PM Harare, Pretoria Join Zoom Meeting https://us05web.zoom.us/j/89704550136?pwd=rNYT9hbBPfAJsFWCYu0MZmMXzbJdXI.1 Meeting chat link https://us05web.zoom.us/launch/jc/89704550136 View meeting insights https://us05web.zoom.us/launch/edl?muid=8a4e4026-a1b2-43c2-8e63-a8db3d7f8008 Meeting ID: 897 045

1 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 4 September 2026

Good day, I'll be hosting a zoom session tonight at 20:30 SAST for the $200 mornings and Copytrading

3👍3

26 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 4 September 2026

$200 mornings will officially start on Monday as everyone would've had an opportunity to make their deposit. I'll be doing a zoom call tomorrow on $200 mornings and $200 mornings copy trading.

4

19 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC294 viewsread 4 September 2026

💰 $200 MORNINGS — COPY TRADING OPTION 💰 If you’d love to join the $200 Mornings but you don’t have the time to trade yourself, or you’re based outside South Africa and aren’t able to follow the signals, I’ve got an option for you! 📈✨ You can simply register and open an account using the link below to join Copy Trading. https://puvip.co/la-partners/LdpIr19X Go to copiers and search for copy ID B10143444 💵 Minimum d

19 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC245 views1 reactionsread 4 September 2026

🔥 $200 MORNINGS ONLY 18 SPOTS LEFT! 🔥 For everyone who joined my session last night and is interested in joining the $200 Mornings, this is your chance to secure your spot. 📈💰 Please register using the link below and make your $150 deposit to secure your place. 🎁 The first 20 people will get FREE access to the group! ⚠️ Only 18 spots remaining! We will be trading currencies only during these sessions. 🔗 Register bel

1

18 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC198 viewsread 4 September 2026

Michelle khoza is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: Michelle khoza's Zoom Meeting Time: Aug 18, 2026 08:30 PM Harare, Pretoria Join Zoom Meeting https://us05web.zoom.us/j/83741662504?pwd=KLF3EbpyIxrcXzAr64I3fD2k6H2PSb.1 Meeting chat link https://us05web.zoom.us/launch/jc/83741662504 Meeting ID: 837 4166 2504 Passcode: 9wAJK9 Join instructions https://us05web.zoom.us/meetings/83741662504/invitations

18 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC201 viewsread 4 September 2026
Poll

Should I bring back Zar copytrading?

  1. Yeah0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tradewuthmiishann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Should I bring back Zar copytrading?

  1. Yeah0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto in Plain English
@Crypto_in_Plain_English · 33,049
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trade with Miishann” (@tradewuthmiishann), 556 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradewuthmiishann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.