This is exactly why I prefer letting people see the numbers for themselves 👀 This subscriber wanted to test everything with just $100 before putting in anything serious After the cycle, the account reached $836, which meant $736 in profit My fee was 20% of the profit - $147.20, leaving him with $588.80 net profit What mattered most to him was simple: he kept control of his own account and could see exactly what h…

Channel
📊Trading with Alex🔞
@tradingdailyalex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
57,582subscribers
+20,924 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003838258127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradingdailyalex |
| Description | Daily market review & trading education. Not financial advice. |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradingdailyalex |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 57,582 | +4,008 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 53,574 | +2,899 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 50,675 | +1,450 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 49,225 | +1,538 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 47,687 | +1,562 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 46,125 | +1,565 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 44,560 | +1,577 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 42,983 | +1,948 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 41,035 | +68 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 40,967 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:33 | 40,992 | +806 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:27 | 40,186 | +587 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 39,599 | +579 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 39,020 | +795 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 38,225 | +609 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 37,616 | +591 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 37,025 | +187 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 36,838 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 36,847 | -23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 36,870 | first reading |
Engagement
895 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.34%
- avg views ÷ 57,582 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,800
- 485 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 485
- of 895 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 895 (7 August 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,328,542 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,570
- Videos
- ≈137
- Links
- ≈88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12m 48s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 895 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradingdailyalex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 895 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 4 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🏹 85% accuracy The result: you don't just get a signal, but a ready‑made path to profit. No guesswork, no unnecessary moves. Spots for personal work are limited 🔴 Want the same accuracy in your trades? Message me: @Alex1trader
Video message, posted without a caption
✅ HOW DOES THE WORK WORK? Everything is simple, transparent, and broken down into 4 easy steps: 1. The Start You fund your own personal account on the platform. You do not send any money to me - your balance remains under your full control 2. The Process I guide you through the session and give you precise, real-time instructions. You simply mirror my actions from your phone or PC 3. The Payout Once we double or …
That feeling when you check the balance after the final trade 👀 $4,681 → $9,225.80 That’s +$4,544.80 added during our personal session 🔥 We took three trades, waited for the right entries and stopped exactly where we planned Another subscriber leaving the session very happy with the result 👌 Want your own session with me? Send BOOK to @Alex1trader
Photo, posted without a caption
Sitting at the chart, I realize: the market is like a conversation with yourself 🔥 When you're honest - it gives. When you lie - it takes away The best trades don't come when you're on edge, but when there's silence inside Today there was that silence. And the result 🔥 Good night, everyone
I’m getting a lot of messages from you 🌟 The most common question - what amount is best to start with? Here’s the direct answer: the most optimal option is $500 This is a balance that gives a solid working range and allows you to get real results Less - limits your opportunities. More - depends on your goals If you want to start the right way without unnecessary trial and error - $500 is the best point 📩 Messag…
Another subscriber just wrapped up a personal session with me 📈 We started with $682 and finished at $1,344 💰 Profit: +$662 Almost doubled the starting balance in one session, following the trades together from start to finish 🔥 Want to join me for the next one? Send BOOK to @Alex1trader
Video, posted without a caption
🔥 This is what proper market work looks like Trade entered → profit secured ✅ No unnecessary emotions No pointless actions Only clear, result-focused execution 📈 That’s exactly why people keep joining and working with me!
Showing the 12 most recent of 895 posts we hold for @tradingdailyalex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tradingdailyalex edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌟How do you feel about risk in trading?
- I risk strictly 1-2% - discipline comes first24%
- I can risk 5-10% - if I'm confident in the trade21%
- I love all-in - I go with my full deposit23%
- I don't trade yet - still learning and observing21%
- I don't think about risk at all - I enter by eye21%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How much net profit do you need today for complete peace of mind?
- 🌟 $50 - $100 (To cover small daily expenses)36%
- 🌟 $300 - $500 (To confidently pay bills and loans)33%
- 🌟 $1000+ (Ready to maximize your balance with Alex!)35%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are you really pushing it off to next month again?
- 🌟 Hell no, I’m ready to change things today!39%
- 🌟 Still overthinking and waiting for a "perfect moment"...30%
- 🌟 Sick of checking price tags, I need a serious change32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Add 2 more slots?
- Yes51%
- No49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Let’s be honest: you are subscribed to the channel, and every single day you see the payout screenshots and reviews from the guys. Why are you still just watching from the sidelines? 👇
- I'm afraid I won't get it / I have no experience 🧠22%
- I think I need a huge balance to start 💳22%
- Looking for a catch (don't believe there are no upfront fees) 🧐26%
- Just lazy, putting it off until "Monday" 🥱30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What's your income goal for this week?
- 💳 $200 – $500 (just for pocket money)72%
- 🔥 $500 – $1,500 (already a solid result)9%
- 🚀 $1,500+ (ready to go all out)10%
- 🤷♂️ I need to figure out how to copy your signals first11%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 895 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📊Trading with Alex🔞” (@tradingdailyalex), 57,582 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradingdailyalex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.