https://x.com/ZKVProtocol/status/2047312832937795933?s=20

Channel
Trailblaze🔥 ($XBLAZE) NEWS
@trailblazenews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,654subscribers
-401 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002096856354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trailblazenews |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trailblazenews |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 13,654 | -29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 13,683 | -16 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 13,699 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 13,718 | -23 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 13,741 | -32 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 13,773 | -18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 13,791 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:54 | 13,808 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 13,819 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 13,834 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 13,841 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 13,852 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 13,858 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 13,874 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 13,881 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 13,892 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 13,910 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 13,926 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 13,938 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 13,944 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 42 | 46.7% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.7% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2025 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📣NXT LAYER WALLET TESTING SIGNUP📣 A quick nudge to join the testing for our iOS/Android hyper-secure wallet of NXT Layer! This is your chance to be among the first to experience cutting-edge tech, help shape its future, and potentially earn airdrop allocations. How to Sign Up: • Fill out this quick form • Submit to secure your spot! We’ll reach out via Telegram to get you started. Be part of the inner circle, …
🔥5⚡1❤1
📣TRAILBLAZE X NXT LAYER📣 We don’t just fundraise, we incubate. NXT Layer is a layer 1 blockchain focussed on security and powering a new wave of dApps First phase of incubation is nearly complete. 🚀Rebrand done 🚀X account incoming 🚀Fundraising open Stay tuned. ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥2😁1
GM Trailblazers! Hope everyone is having an amazing weekend. As of today, XBLAZE has been delisted by MEXC Exchange. Despite complying with all of their requests and requirements, MEXC has chosen to proceed with the delisting. We regret this outcome, but we remain unfazed—our conviction has never been stronger that the future belongs to DEXs. XBLAZE remains available on Uniswap. If you hold XBLAZE on MEXC, please…
❤3😱2🤝1🥰1🙏1
🎙We’re back for Real🎙 The market’s heating up again. Will we finally build what matters, or get distracted by shiny thing again? 🗓This Thursday 13:30 CET ➡️Check out our tweet!
❤2🔥1😁1
📣 Electric’s Corner: The Truth About Crypto Fundraising (And How to Get It Right) 📣 ➡️Check out our latest Medium Article!
❤3👍1🔥1😁1
🎙Liquidity Maxxing In Crypto 🎙 Founders - if you want to not just survive, but also thrive in these times, need to master liquidity. We’re going live with @triremetrading to uncover the secrets of market making. 🗓This Thursday 15:00 CET ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥2❤1👍1🤩1
📣TRAILBLAZE X DAPPRADAR 📣 Trailblaze is now an official DappLaunch partner of @DappRadar, which further cements our ongoing collaboration, allowing for: ✅More visibility for projects launching on Trailblaze ✅Further reach for all our ecosystem partners ✅More ways to win together ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥2❤1🎉1👏1
🎙DappRadar AMA 🎙 Where’s the Next Rotation? Memes pumped. AI had its run. Now the market’s eerily quiet… what’s next? Join us with @DappRadar as we hunt for the next big trend before it takes off. 🗓This Thursday 14.00 pm CET ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥3❤1❤🔥1
📣 What Has Changed in Web3 Fundraising?📣 ➡️ Check out our latest Medium article!
🔥2❤🔥1👍1
🟢$GRIZZY TGE🟢 Feeling Bera? @grizzyfi TGE is happening today! 🚀 Ticker: $GRIZZY 🚀 Network: @berachain 🚀 Contract: 0x5032FD03f2645Cd78309ff775318a5Aee8216BE2 🚀 Exchanges: @KodiakFi Claim at 16:05 CET. 🔗Claim here https://app.trailblaze.xyz/ido/grizzyfi ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥1
▶️$GRIZZY Standard FCFS Round is OPEN▶️ No whitelist. No waiting. Just buy. @Grizzyfi is changing the IDO game on @berachain. Are you in? 🐻⛓️ 🔗Buy here https://app.trailblaze.xyz/ido/grizzyfi ➡️Check out our tweet!
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trailblazenews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@trailblazenews named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 43 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@miladymemecoinchannel · 22,038
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 September 2026
@Galeon_ANN · 22,133
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
@clusterprotocolann · 34,390
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@CVALPHA_news · 57,076
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@brightsetup · 102,861
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@codyfightnews · 49,113
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,266
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@ordifyANN · 37,472
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
@galaxylabofficial · 50,609
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@MindAINews · 65,388
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@theshadoworder · 295,924
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@dtectoken · 21,186
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@EnginesOfFuryNews · 59,553
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@da_ga_ma · 72,436
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@RealityMeta · 41,770
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
@ForwardProtocol · 45,425
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@finceptor_ann · 23,208
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
@BinStarterAnnouncement · 23,948
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@filiptradingcommunity · 22,490
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
@yaynetwork_ann · 41,240
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
@StabilityworldAI · 46,419
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
@randommagfa · 24,224
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
@cryptohunters_announcements · 71,315
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@seafi_announcements · 86,051
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trailblaze🔥 ($XBLAZE) NEWS” (@trailblazenews), 13,654 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trailblazenews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.