Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fancy Philosopher

Channel

Fancy Philosopher

@traumafactoryy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,981subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180788413
TypeChannel
Username@traumafactoryy
Created27 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/traumafactoryy

Growth

9,98110,08010,030.56 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,074 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,073 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,079 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,077 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,068 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,061 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,054 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,046 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,042 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,034 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,030 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,015 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,010 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,008 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,002 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,981 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 34 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,966–10,095 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 03:199,981-21
5 Sept 2026, 18:1610,002-6
3 Sept 2026, 16:4110,008-2
2 Sept 2026, 11:2810,010-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:3710,015-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:5610,018-7
30 Aug 2026, 05:4410,025-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:4210,027-3
28 Aug 2026, 03:2510,030-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:4310,034-8
25 Aug 2026, 22:2510,042-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:2310,046-8
21 Aug 2026, 22:3710,054-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:2410,055-5
19 Aug 2026, 19:4210,060-1
18 Aug 2026, 21:0510,061-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:5610,063-2
15 Aug 2026, 15:1210,065-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:4610,068-9
10 Aug 2026, 20:0510,077first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 9,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
664
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held30 (4 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total9,956
Reactions total245
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 32s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

539 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥10820.0%
💘8515.8%
🔥8215.2%
😁7513.9%
💯417.61%
🤩346.31%
👍336.12%
🤯325.94%
😢285.19%
81.48%
🤨71.30%
😨30.557%
🤷‍♀30.557%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @traumafactoryy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC275 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @goldchihuahuaPhoto

Все герои новых «Голодных игр» на фотографиях Даны Трипп для Entertainment Weekly

💘9🔥9👍5

24 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC563 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Сначала я подумала, что взлом, но в тг они тоже выставили…

🤯8😢3😨3

24 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC597 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @bogemasranayaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5❤‍🔥1💯1🤷‍♀1

23 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC615 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @bloggers_mamaPhoto

Самый популярный модный аккаунт в запрещенной соцсети прямо сейчас — Husbands at Hermes, посвященный мужьям, которые ждут своих жен в бутиках бренда. Надеюсь, это гениальный ход от Hermes, чтобы показать мужчинам, что всё не так страшно… пока не увидел чек) Ну или они должны сделать с ним коллаборацию! Мамка блогеров в MAX

❤‍🔥14😁9👍4

23 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC787 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я стала куратором на новой платформе Brand-map. Здесь очень удобно делать подборки, так как можно сразу и приобрести вещь! Так что ищите меня там, подписывайтесь, буду регулярно выискивать вам классные вещи 💗

❤‍🔥10👍10🔥6

20 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC859 views31 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Жестко видно, как ей неудобно..спасибо, Chanel 👍🏼😐

😢23😁6💯2

18 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC971 views14 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

П = Т − С где П — подтекст, Т — текст, С — сказанное всё остальное читатель додумывает сам sofia rodina denis kostitsyn novikov tjaata 𝖊𝖆𝖗𝖑𝖞 𝖇𝖎𝖗𝖉𝖘 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 28.08 leveldva 22:00 🤡 дикотак

❤‍🔥5🔥4👍3🤷‍♀2

18 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC897 views23 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Ахахаха он реально такой тупой или рофлит 🤣 вообще весь выпуск выносящий

😁15💯5💘3

17 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC755 views12 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @goldchihuahuaPhoto

Все-таки вайб WAG не оттереть даже Vogue, особенно когда за дело берется Теллер и не очень-то и старается((

❤‍🔥5😁5💯2

14 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC714 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @goldchihuahua

Интервью Адама Кёртиса для VICE, вышедшее этой весной, теперь можно почитать бесплатно 🔈 https://www.vice.com/en/article/leaving-the-21st-century-adam-curtis-talks-to-dean-kissick/

🔥3❤‍🔥1👍1

13 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC683 views16 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @pechenuwkiPhoto

Как же он вайбил… Простите, но это лучшая обложка среди всех сентябрьских 2026 от конде наста: Джереми Стронг в GQ промит продолжения «Социальной сети» Финчера под названием «Социальный расчёт» (Соркина).

🔥10👍4❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @traumafactoryy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,396
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,659
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fancy Philosopher” (@traumafactoryy), 9,981 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/traumafactoryy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.