Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,457–6,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:59
6,486
-14
11 Sept 2026, 22:15
6,500
-27
7 Sept 2026, 11:59
6,527
-36
2 Sept 2026, 15:58
6,563
-19
30 Aug 2026, 08:54
6,582
-16
27 Aug 2026, 14:12
6,598
-12
24 Aug 2026, 12:24
6,610
-14
20 Aug 2026, 09:57
6,624
-9
17 Aug 2026, 20:14
6,633
-21
14 Aug 2026, 09:26
6,654
-10
11 Aug 2026, 11:32
6,664
-16
8 Aug 2026, 04:58
6,680
no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:18
6,680
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 15 January 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
304 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
32.6%
👍
96
31.6%
😁
36
11.8%
✍
24
7.89%
🐳
17
5.59%
🕊
12
3.95%
👀
7
2.30%
🔥
7
2.30%
⚡
3
0.987%
🍌
3
0.987%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2022 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интересно наблюдать изменения тенденции крипто маркета крайние пару лет
Биткоин всего пол года в корекции, за это время из узких ниш успело вымыть большую часть неподкованного ритейла, про веб2.5 вообще молчим
Так же стабильно падает и активность VC игроков, ребятки в галстуках все с большей опаской смотрят на каждый новый «единорог» у своей двери
А я напомню что именно крипта была самым сладким полем для горе-старт…
Крутая книга, всем советую
До прочтения отталкивала эта излишне пафосная фраза про власть снизу, но это всего-лишь слова маркетологов которые эту книгу продают, а не самого автора
С макиавелизмом был знаком давно но всегда думал что это учение конфликтует с другими моими ценностями, оказалось что нет 🙂
Идеальный кейс, циркулейт на руках конский, реализацией занимаются профессионалы у которых в портфолио десятки краймов
Что дальше с токеном? Фаундер там позитивный, у парня недвиги в Корее столько что нарисовать может хоть 20$, вопрос захочет ли. Думаю нет, да и ммы ему советуют что сильно выше качать невыгодно
Всем салют, почти год не слышались
В моменте захотелось вещать свои мысли в мир и вспомнил что у меня есть этот канал :)
Итак место сбора наибольшего количества ликвы и волюмов сейчас это краймы на фьючах, эта кормушка достаточно древняя но особые обороты набрала год назад (спасибо дяде Дональду). Хочу рассказать свои наблюдения и выводы побывав по обе стороны барикады
— Как на этом делать деньги, будем идти от ме…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @trenchlogbyL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“L’s trenchlog” (@trenchlogbyL), 6,486 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trenchlogbyL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
