Channel
@trexcellio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
128subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002546376761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trexcellio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trexcellio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 128 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 127 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 126 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 12.2% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 3.85% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А в какой ситуации Excel сильнее всего портит вам жизнь?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы выбрали.... По результатам голосования тренажёр отправляется в девять кругов ада 😈. Не знаю, что именно это говорит об аудитории канала Хотя люди, которые хотя бы раз открывали файл финал_итоговый_точно_последний_v7.xlsx, наверное, уже там побывали 😉 Так, с декорациями определились. Сюжет я тоже наколдую. А теперь надо понять, за какие именно Excel-грехи туда отправлять. У каждого здесь свой круг. Мои фаворит…
👍2😍2
Итак, темой тренажера будет...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
👀1
Висяк У всех нас есть какие-то фоновые незаконченные дела. Вот это вот все: - залечить зуб - разобраться на балконе/на даче/с документами - выучить английский - по утрам бегит, пресс, анжуманя (с) О них вспоминаешь вечером перед сном. Ну, или когда официант спрашивает тебя: "Is everything okay, sir?" А ты не можешь ответить, потому что десерт оказался слишком сладким и зуб снова заболел. Ну и английский ты так и …
👍7
久しぶり (hisashiburi) — японское. Буквально: «давно не виделись». Знаете то чувство, когда встречаете на улице старого знакомого и буквально не знаете, с чего начать? И новостей много, и изменились вы оба сильно. Сложно считывать какие-то невербальные сигналы. И поговорить хочется, но времени не так много… Я долго искал подходящее слово. И hisashiburi, наверное, ближе всего к тому, что я испытываю к этому блогу. В о…
👍8🔥3😎2
Дети сказали, что это я 😂
😁8🔥6😎2👍1🤣1
Заработал на Porsche 😁 А у вас что новенького?
👍8🤣6🤓1
Жил-был мужик Обычный такой: работал в офисе, крутил таблички, ходил на созвоны - как все, в общем. А ещё вёл канал в телеге. Писал про эксель, экспериментировал с форматами и развлекался как мог. Но налетел февраль лютый. Принёс снега по пояс, работы - по макушку, а заодно опричников из ведомства страшного, трёхбуквенного. Те начали запрещать телеги всякие и обещали добраться до других слов из трёх букв. Мужик …
❤21⚡5👍4
Ирония судьбы (но не та, о которой вы подумали) Есть такой человек - Ким Воронин. Когда у меня спрашивают, как научиться рисовать слайды, я даю ссылку на его блог. Я сам так учился. В отличие от своих коллег по цеху, Ким практически все секреты выкладывал в открытую на ютубе (осторожно, много мата). Его курсы заточены на то, чтобы быстро пробежать первую сотню - другую слайдов и разобрать персональные ошибки каж…
👍12🔥4
Лучше сделать и пожалеть, чем не сделать и жалеть Когда я готовил этот пост, мне все время что-то не нравилось, как-то хотелось еще поиграться с самим сервисом... В итоге, пост «протух» - выходят новые нейронки, лучше и качественнее. Поэтому пусть будет тут для истории, в следующей серии покажу, насколько вперед шагнули технологии Дизайнеры презентаций вымрут Примерно 1-2 месяца назад мне попался сервис по созда…
👍9🔥3
Эта картинка напоминает мне ребят и девчат, которые учат пользоваться новыми нейронками😁
😁5💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @trexcellio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А в какой ситуации Excel сильнее всего портит вам жизнь?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Итак, темой тренажера будет...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T-Rex.cell” (@trexcellio), 128 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trexcellio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.