🎁 Программа благодарности участникам Ummabook.ru При покупке книг Шамиля, Зили и Ильдара Аляутдиновых вы можете получить дополнительные подарки. Чем больше сумма заказа, тем больше материалов откроется для вас. 🎁 При покупке от 3 000 ₽ Вы получаете в подарок: 📘 «Фетвы. Том 1» Сборник актуальных фетв, подготовленных российскими богословами и одобренных Советом улемов ДУМ РФ. Ответы на современные вопросы веры, сем…

Channel
Триллионер
@trillioner
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,703subscribers
-687 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001072881944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trillioner |
| Description | Многодневные семинары, вебинары. Онлайн курсы. Индивидуальные консультации. Книги и Аудиокниги. Полезный блог. https://trillioner.life/tap |
| Created | 3 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trillioner |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 24,703 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 24,706 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 24,713 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 24,725 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 24,734 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:35 | 24,745 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 24,753 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:00 | 24,764 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 24,778 | -18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 24,796 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 24,808 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 24,818 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 24,825 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 24,830 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 24,832 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 24,839 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:14 | 24,842 | -11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 24,853 | -22 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 24,875 | -17 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 24,892 | first reading |
Engagement
266 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.56%
- avg views ÷ 24,703 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,130
- 102 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.11%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 266 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 266 (4 August 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 114,820 |
| Reactions total | 3,570 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,150
- Videos
- ≈4,520
- Links
- ≈5,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 49m
- Average length
- 1m 15s
Measured directly from 88 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,734 reactions across 256 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,137 | 58.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,848 | 21.2% | |
| 👍 | 1,479 | 16.9% | |
| 🙏 | 140 | 1.60% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 0.321% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 0.309% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 0.286% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 0.103% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.08% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.08% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.069% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.057% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.046% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.034% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.034% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 0.034% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.023% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.011% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 265 of the 266 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,994 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 266 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 266 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trillioner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 266 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
КАКУЮ ДЕНЕЖНУЮ ИСТОРИЮ ВЫ РАССКАЗЫВАЕТЕ СЕБЕ? Почему одни люди постепенно создают капитал, а другие даже при увеличении доходов продолжают жить от зарплаты до зарплаты? Дело не всегда в размере заработка. Иногда причина скрывается гораздо глубже, в наших убеждениях, привычках и представлениях о деньгах. У каждого из нас есть своя денежная история. И зачастую мы даже не замечаем, как она влияет на наши решения и фи…
❤10
Она такой же человек, а в чем-то даже умнее и мудрее. Она имеет полное право реализоваться в вопросе финансовой независимости. 🇷🇺 Наш канал в Maкс
❤31👍10😢3
В погоне за имиджем Знаете ли вы, что люди тратят деньги, которых у них нет, просто чтобы произвести впечатление? Если вы покупаете автомобиль в кредит, это явно означает, что вы не можете себе его позволить. Но — поразительный факт! — почти половина людей берет дорогие авто в кредит. В большей части дорогих машин, которые вы видите на дорогах, сидят люди, которые даже не могут их себе позволить! “Увы, расточительн…
❤28👍9🔥3
Дорогая машина, путешествия, высокий уровень жизни – все это еще не говорит о финансовом благополучии. Можно много зарабатывать и тратить всё до последнего рубля. А можно постепенно создавать капитал, который будет работать на вас. Зарабатывать. Сберегать. Инвестировать. Три навыка, которые способны изменить ваше финансовое будущее. Научитесь применять их на практике вместе с Шамилем Аляутдиновым на интенсиве «Ф…
❤15👍10🔥5
Некоторые живут не по нравственным законам доброты, сострадания и созидания, а постоянным поиском чужих предполагаемых ошибок, недостатков. Так свою жизнь не построить, да и с другими мостов взаимопонимания не выстроить. Таков их выбор. Выбор каждого из нас. 📕 Книга «Деньги работают на меня» 🇷🇺 Наш канал в Maкс
❤23👍9🙏3
Завершился 5-дневный семинар Шамиля Аляутдинова 🇹🇷 Ближайшие мероприятия: 🚀 13 декабря: Вебинар «Финансовый прорыв за 1 день» Подробнее: https://trillioner.life/1webinars 💰14 марта: Финансовый забег Подробнее: https://trillioner.life/6webinars Написать менеджеру: 📱 Telegram 📱 WhatsApp 🇷🇺 Max
❤17⚡7🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥21❤13🙏2
Боксерская груша 🥊 📕Книга «Ежедневник Триллионера»: https://clck.ru/3QwNTP
❤19🔥13👍8😁3
Можно зарабатывать больше, но продолжать жить в кредит, занимать деньги и повторять одни и те же финансовые ошибки. «Финансовый прорыв за 1 день» – 6-часовой онлайн-интенсив Шамиля Аляутдинова, доступная альтернатива 45-дневному финансовому забегу. 📌13 декабря 🌎 Участие из любой точки мира. Начните менять не только свои финансы, но и отношение к ним 👇 https://trillioner.life/1webinars
❤20👍8🔥5
Бутылочное горлышко — серия незавершенных связей, которые расходуют ментальную энергию и создают очередь. Новые задачи, требующие решения, ждут, пока не будет принято решение по старым, важным, «зависшим». Тем более, когда «зависшая» относится к задачам «более высокого уровня», а ныне решаемые — к вытекающим из нее. 📘 Книга «Стань самым умным и самым богатым» 🇷🇺 Наш канал в Max
❤22👍10
Деньги не гарантируют счастья. Но сколько возможностей они открывают! Больше времени на семью, свободы в принятии решений, возможностей путешествовать, развиваться и помогать другим. Финансовый достаток редко приходит сам по себе. Умение зарабатывать, сохранять и приумножать деньги – это навыки, которым можно и нужно учиться. 13 декабря Шамиль Аляутдинов проведет онлайн-интенсив «Финансовый прорыв за 1 день». За …
❤18👍8🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 266 posts we hold for @trillioner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@trillioner edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@umma_ru · 55,342#1
@alyautdinova_zilya · 5,716#2
@MargulanSeissembai · 207,519#3
@islamic_finance_plus · 5,502#4
@xannanovv_blog · 293#5
@halalinvests · 19,641#6
@biktagirovrail · 3,529#7
@ilnar_shams · 3,123#8
@LianausainovaLI · 8,492#9
@b2b_bc · 956#10
@alyautdinovildar · 12,530#11
@IslamAlyatdinov · 1,924#12
@day365islam · 5,646#13
@sovetulemov · 4,462#14
@day365su · 1,137#15
@culturalcenter_dar · 3,553#16
@mullaiz · 8,059#17
@IQRAMoscow · 2,975#18
@visambardvil · 1,792#19
@forbesrussia · 235,532#20
@Kanal_Poznay_sebya · 5,999#21
@fundzakat · 3,034#22
@islam_is_our_life · 3,975#23
@dum_moscow · 4,038#24
@amal_bank · 4,827#25
@zokirfinance · 13,383#26
@amirbek_channel · 8,572#27
@naz_galam_art · 424#28
@finans_islam · 1,280#29
@milliardtatar · 13,824#30
@journalummakids · 813#31
@islamt · 10,385#32
@investingstofuture · 179#33
@businessgazeta · 51,358#34
@khava_shaidullina · 6,661#35
@sahih_invest · 1,061#36
@syndicate_investments · 7,702#37
@bulatmubarakoff · 3,169#38
@tashkentrunners · 6,101#39
@AMIINAISLAMOVA · 11,494#40
@berkam_trading · 5,816#41
@devitmark · 626#42
@life_off_muhammad · 178#43
@AlisherIsaev_blogi · 42,623#44
@dinusyon · 601#45
@i_zametki · 750#46
@ikbolpsihogenetika · 1,866#47
@muslim_life_tg · 3,437#48
@islamiccapital · 4,139#49
@virtumm · 240#50
@wondersAround · 289#51
@Ed_travel_life · 1,101#52
@romanovich_ser · 37,789#53
@muslimmol · 5,159#54
@zangar_masjid · 2,474#55
@rustamminnikhanov · 66,913#56
@aateam7 · 528#57
@tokpc · 3,106#58
@quran_foreveryone · 597#59
@muslimeco · 1,118#60
@safronov4brainn · 549#61
@proislam_ds · 161#62
@ImanKuanyshqyzy · 9,054#63
@alibekovkz · 52,901#64
@modestcovered · 2,133#65
@academyalif · 2,522#66
@medina_school · 5,646#67
@ilnarmulla · 3,842#68
@hanafischool · 7,712#69
@kamil_hazrat · 9,445#70
@gazetauz · 86,033#71
@spotuz · 27,364#72
@DUM_RF · 5,821#73
@tatyaz · 6,992#74
@mehrob_uz · 220,447#75
@shmirziyoyev · 256,185#76
@moscow_islamic_institute · 1,819#77
@salimasaidistories · 2,843#78
@asiaplus · 68,793#79
@ruslankurbanovTG · 26,472#80
@gazetabo · 33,739#81
@dua365islam · 2,088#82
@ShavkatMusinov · 737#83
@ahmadzaki_masjid · 1,626#84
@mariiyammahmudovauz · 8#85
@litsey7_vipusknik · 356#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@umma_ru · 55,342
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
@saidmurod_davlatov_official · 29,766
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
@halalinvests · 19,641
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Триллионер” (@trillioner), 24,703 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trillioner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.