Channel
@trovoopik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
435subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002335973565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trovoopik |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trovoopik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 435 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 433 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 432 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 428 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 428 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 29.9% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 18.9% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 14.2% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 8.66% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 8.66% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 3.94% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.15% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Комитет по охране ОКН озвучил свое мнение о сносе Мергасовского дома Завершение технического обследования несущих конструкций Мергасовского дома не освобождает Комитет Республики Татарстан по охране объектов культурного наследия от обязанности соблюдать установленный законом регламент работы с памятниками. Отсутствие предмета охраны исключает возможность демонтажа. Согласно официальному ответу ведомства (исх. № б/н…
🙏11😭3😱3🥰1
Сегодня волонтёры «Том Сойер Феста» ударно поработали в Музее пожарной охраны МЧС в Адмиралтейской слободе 🗝️ Создан он был в 1978 году художником-оформителем Рашитом Сафиуллиным. Музей представляет собой единственный такого рода целостный экспозиционный объект, оставшийся с советского периода в Татарстане, поэтому так важно было о нём позаботиться. В защитные плёнки и коробки были упакованы все экспонаты, модели …
❤5🔥4👍3
Хотим поделиться красивым видео и вдохновляющим постом от исследователя архитектуры, лектора Юлии Глазыриной на тему советских мозаичных остановок. Юлия делится воспоминаниями о своей любимой - остановке в Боровое Матюшино: «Советские мозаичные остановки — маленькие памятники эпохе: идеология, культура и повседневность, собранные из колотых плиток. Появились они не потому, что кто-то решил украсить жизнь трудящихс…
❤16👍6🥰5
В продолжение темы сохранения 5 мозаичных остановок в Татарстане предлагаем вам ознакомиться с подробной статьёй «Реального времени»📌 В материале раскрывается история и художественная ценность этих объектов, а также рассказывается о работе по их спасению. Как верно подмечает Наталья Севрюгина, автор интернет-проекта «Мозаичные остановки Марий Эл», ценность этого наследия гораздо глубже, чем просто архитектура: «Это…
❤15👍4👏2💯1
Как теперь смотреть в глаза героям наших сказок? Гибель одной мозаичной остановки💔 Осенью 2025 года уникальную мозаику на тему татарских сказок к (на 23-м километре Матюшинского тракта), украшавшую павильон, снесли. Вместо восстановления её заменили на роспись, имитирующую оригинальный узор. Фотографии говорят сами за себя: мы потеряли настоящее произведение искусства с очень выразительными лицами персонажей. Утеш…
😱15👍3😢2❤1
«Тюбетейка»: мозаика против фотопечати В 2018 году оригинальное мозаичное панно на здании «Тюбетейки» было частично разрушено. Вместо реставрации узор воссоздали в технике фотопечати — решение, очевидно, продиктованное сиюминутной экономией. Спустя восемь лет новое покрытие сильно выцвело: рисунок потерял яркость и блестит на солнце, в глаза бросается разница фактуры. Оригинальные мозаичные элементы здания 1978 год…
👍8😭8💔5💯5❤1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @trovoopik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТРО ВООПИК” (@trovoopik), 435 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trovoopik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.