Channel
@trudnix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,377subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001462403711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trudnix |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trudnix |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 1,377 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 1,380 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 1,384 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 1,390 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 1,395 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 1,397 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 1,402 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 1,403 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,405 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 1,408 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,410 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 1,410 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
246 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 61.8% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 26.0% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.03% | |
| custom 5456575436387523568 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.407% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За июль прочитала одну книгу на турецком из своего списка Engereğin gözü и дочитала две начатые, «Магазинчик психических расстройств» Михайлова, но она оказалась не совсем моя и «Мистерии» Кнута Гамсуна, но «Голод» мне больше понравился. Сегодня закончила «Книжный клуб ЦРУ», к чему и приурочен праздниквыход поста. А так активно в последнее время читаю «Краткую историю Франции». Продолжаю читать по чуть-чуть на китай…
❤22🔥6
Но я всегда беру с собой в поездку не одну книгу😁 так что сейчас читаю эту, купила её в книжном «Озеро», легко идет)
🔥20❤8
Просто смех, я прочитала 30 страниц Zehra и думаю, вроде я это уже читала, оказывается, что да, в 24-м году😂😂 но похоже кому-то отдала, потому что дома её нет и обложка там была другая, причем когда я её покупала, сюжет показался знакомым😂 Раньше я думала, что только названия фильмов и сериалов плохо запоминаю😂 Ну главное, что по ходу чтения узнала само произведение😂 У меня уже было такое с другой книгой - «Лунный к…
❤21🔥4🤣2custom 54565754363875235682
File, posted without a caption
🥰8🔥2
Случайная находка арабской музыки👀
❤11
Собираюсь начать сегодня Zehra 🇹🇷, с языками на высоком уровне всегда так комфортно и удобно, как будто не надо напрягаться, в отличие от хинди или арабского, где надо каждый раз сделать некоторое усилие над собой. У меня чаще всего два режима: или же я сверх погружаюсь и хочу скорее разгадать/расшифровать всё незнакомое мне в языке или же наотрез отказываюсь и делаю это редкими урывками. В этом году никакого баланс…
❤29🔥7🍓3❤🔥1
Снова временно выпала из канала, но не совсем из языков, сейчас я больше в своем творческом канале @kartinavt Что по промежуточным итогам по целям года? В китайском 🇨🇳 постепенно двигаюсь по поставленной цели. Я наконец-то закончила первую часть 《平凡的世界》 路遥 («Обыкновенный мир» Лу Яо), это 400+ страниц и начала вторую. Вторая и третья такие же по объему. Первую я наверное год читала, но не теряю надежды прочитать две…
🔥22❤9🤯5
Давно не было постов, но скоро выйдет отчёт по плану на этот год. В этом году иду всё по тем же языкам: китайский 🇨🇳 турецкий 🇹🇷 персидский 🇮🇷 арабский 🇦🇪 хинди 🇮🇳 Хотя этот список только часть моей глобальной мечты. Напоминаю про некоторые полезные посты на канале: ⚪️метод запоминания новых слов ⚪️как получать результаты в языках и в жизни ⚪️как я сдавала экзамен по китайскому HSK5 и результат ⚪️ресурсы для изуче…
❤23🔥3custom 54565754363875235681
Начало июня и я снова в Питере, так как у моей самой близкой подруги день рождения в четверг ☺️ Сходила сегодня в индийский ресторан namaste, который мне нравился, но в этот раз показалось, что уже не так вкусно, как раньше🤔 И моя первая купленная книга за июнь))
❤29🍓5🌚3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @trudnix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иностранные языки и книги” (@trudnix), 1,377 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trudnix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.