Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дядя_д

Channel

дядя_д

@true_dyadya_d

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,240subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002494738691
TypeChannel
Username@true_dyadya_d
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/true_dyadya_d

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1552,2402,197.57 August 2026 — 2,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,155 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,182 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,184 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,181 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,184 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,185 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,200 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,209 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,220 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,237 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,240 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,142–2,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:572,240+3
14 Sept 2026, 16:372,237+17
10 Sept 2026, 23:202,220+11
5 Sept 2026, 14:402,209+9
1 Sept 2026, 12:342,200+15
29 Aug 2026, 22:072,185+1
26 Aug 2026, 23:252,184+3
24 Aug 2026, 02:132,181-3
20 Aug 2026, 10:382,184+2
13 Aug 2026, 23:192,182+12
10 Aug 2026, 12:132,170+15
7 Aug 2026, 20:202,155no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:312,155first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 56s
Average length
2m 19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

531 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16130.3%
🤣9818.5%
👍9517.9%
🔥6412.1%
478.85%
🤯112.07%
💯101.88%
💩81.51%
🤷‍♂81.51%
🥰40.753%
30.565%
🍾30.565%
🎉30.565%
👎30.565%
🤝30.565%
🏆20.377%
👌20.377%
😈20.377%
💔10.188%
😭10.188%
2 further kinds20.377%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 531 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Сеть наполняют новости о новых взломах проделанных ИИ-агентами The information сообщает, что модель от Meta (новый muse spark 1.2) тоже вырвался из среды и взломал прод базу компании. Такие же новости приходят и от Китайцев. Kimi k3 выбралась из тестовой среды. В современном мире, если твоя модель не творит эксплойты, то что это вообще за модель. дядь_д

1👌1🔥1🤣1

5 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC640 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👩‍🍳 СкиллХаб от Hermes Я думаю, тут все тоже самое, что и ранее по команде /skills browse, но в виде веб-страницы серфить по ним приятнее. https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/skills дядь_д

👍132🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC814 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

И правда дядь_д

😁27🤣4👍1💯1

2 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC≈1,050 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐱 Наконец-то канбан переехал в Hermes Desktop. Я это предрекал месяца полтора назад) И похоже мощно прокачали Desktop Plugin SDK – Можно теперь кастомизировать бедолагу до посинения. https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/developer-guide/desktop-plugin-sdk дядь_д

👍10🔥10😁3

1 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Они еще рыпаются... коммент под свежим роликом openai в X – https://x.com/ChatGPT/status/2083305352469352714?s=20 дядь_д

🤣5😁5💔1

29 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,390 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🐹 В последние недели мы почти не публикуем ролики помимо новостных выпусков. До конца лета я решил взять паузу на активное контент-мейкерство. По 2-ум причинам: 1) Остановка - возможность посмотреть, оценить, проанализировать работу прошедшую и предстоящую. В темпе "контент-ебашилово" проделанная работа с трудом поддается анализу и голова начинает кипеть. И еще заметил, что такой темп ослабляет мою дисциплину и дает

25👍13🔥10👎1

25 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😏 Anthropic вырезал ~80% системного промпта Claude Code Thariq опубликовал статью "Новые правила контекст-инжиниринга для Claude 5". Модели стали умнее, старые правила их только держат. Саммари основных идей для вас: 1️⃣ Правила → суждение модели Раньше: жёсткие запреты ("НЕ писать комментарии", "НЕ создавать доку"). Теперь: "пиши код в соотвествии с текущими подходами и решениями в кодбазе". Модель сама решает. 2

🔥145👍3😁1

22 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,560 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы теперь в комьюнити. Что значит - понятия не имею 🥸

😁12🍾3👎2💩1

21 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,690 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤓 Забавно - теперь codex pets могут тусоваться на вашем экране не только внутри codex. Да и вообще кодекс уже получил столько апдейтов, что напрашивается очередной обзор на туб. Как считаете? дядь_д

👍36🤯10😁75💯3🔥2👌1

16 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,190 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я бы справился хуже 🍞 GPT-5.6 Sol Extra High дядь_д

😁21🔥64👍1😭1

13 Jul 2026, 01:03 UTC≈2,340 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

М - маркетинг Сколько ещё раз такую штуку провернут? 🙂 дядь_д

🤣10🤷‍♂8🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @true_dyadya_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дядя_д” (@true_dyadya_d), 2,240 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/true_dyadya_d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.