Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for А вы точно сибирский политолог?

Channel

А вы точно сибирский политолог?

@truepolitsib

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,110subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001400746627
TypeChannel
Username@truepolitsib
Created3 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/truepolitsib

Growth

3,1103,1273,118.56 August 2026 — 3,126 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,126 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,125 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,124 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,120 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,117 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,119 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,117 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,111 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,110 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,107–3,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 07:373,110-1
4 Sept 2026, 09:023,111-6
31 Aug 2026, 15:363,117-2
28 Aug 2026, 08:173,119+4
25 Aug 2026, 11:163,115-2
22 Aug 2026, 06:133,117-3
19 Aug 2026, 01:243,120-4
15 Aug 2026, 20:423,124-1
12 Aug 2026, 16:153,125-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:523,127+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:403,126no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:173,126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

841 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯26531.5%
😁22526.8%
🔥10011.9%
🤣769.04%
👏556.54%
🤡293.45%
222.62%
👍182.14%
😢172.02%
🤬121.43%
🐳50.595%
🤮40.476%
🥱40.476%
👎30.357%
🤩30.357%
👀20.238%
😱10.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,540 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кроме того, разговор с людьми часто строится вокруг конкретных проблем (дом, двор, предприятие), потому к каждой встрече «необходимо готовиться предметно» и не стесняться «разрывать шаблоны». Например, услышав про проблемы с водоснабжением, идти в дом, крутить кран, звонить в ЖЭК, «демонстрируя реальное желание разобраться в проблеме». Коллеги, мы прям представили, как кандидат в депутаты Сергей Александрович П. идё

🤡19😁17🐳53👏2🤮1

31 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,440 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самым ценным активом депутата является доверие, которое строится «месяцами и годами через близость к людям, открытость, готовность разговаривать», подчеркивается в брошюре. Ебать. Да ладно?? Избиратели вправе требовать от кандидата «реальной работы с людьми», а не «отношения к ним, как к электорату, который нужно один раз мобилизовать и забыть до следующей кампании». Избиратели вправе требовать, конечно, но вы пос

💯25🔥13😁11🤡61👍1

31 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,190 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги из других партий резонно интересуются: что, блять, там можно было написать на СОРОКА ДЕВЯТИ СТРАНИЦАХ???

😁19👏42😱1

29 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,920 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, если вы думаете, что за такими «новостными» постами не видно их стоимости, то вы идиоты. Но чего от этих блядей людей ожидать.

👏11💯6👍5👎3😁3🤡2🤮1

24 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,080 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Новые бляди люди». Мы засираем всё, что осталось незасранным после «Единой России»! Коллеги, нужны слоганы для ЛДПР и КПРФ, помогайте.

🔥304😁3

24 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,000 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги с мест сообщают, что на одной из встреч с избирателями Сергей Александрович Пономаренко сказал, цитата, «Мы засираем всё вокруг себя». Коллеги, умри, а лучше слогана для Всероссийской политической партии «Единая Россия» не придумаешь. 🧸 «Единая Россия». Мы засираем всё вокруг себя! Коллеги, берём в работу?

💯48🔥14👏12🤩3

22 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈4,290 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вася, это прекрасно.

🔥34👍5

22 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,250 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дёрнул нас чёрт посмотреть ещё штук десять последних публикаций в аккаунте СИРКИ. Коллеги, если у вас заявлены 5000 подписчиков, а средний охват поста что-то в районе 350 человек, то всем понятно, что вы ДАЖЕ НА ЭТОМ ВОРУЕТЕ. Блять, как можно быть такими долбоёбами за такие бюджетные миллиарды, а ((((((( Как??? (((

💯26😁8👏6

22 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,010 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, в истории про Сибирский институт КРЕАТИВНЫХ индустрий и каких-то там их резидентов интересно даже не то, что кто-то наконец решил сказать правду: эта ёбаная контора создана ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО для отмывов, распилов и поддержки ближнего круга Сергея Александровича, Юлии Вячеславовны и, возможно, пары людей ещё. Никакой поддержки, если вы преданно не смотрите в рот, никакие независимые творческие индустрии там не по

💯26😁9🔥5👏3

18 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,190 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, мастер-класс «Как даже хорошую идею можно превратить в говно» даёт сегодня глава Минусинска. — Ну я такой ехал себе, ехал, а тут целая съёмочная группа. Случайно, конечно, так не планировалось! Не, ну а я чо, раз съемочная группа всё равно есть, решили сюжет про меня сделать, а я не против, — отметил чиновник. Есть мнение, коллеги, что у случайной встречи Меркулова с журналистами и небезызвестной поездки в

😁19💯8👏5🤡1

6 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,870 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Впрочем, мы все знаем, почему от Шепелева в ближайшее время никто не откажется, а некоторые даже знают, сколько это конкретно в деньгах. Говорят, даже люди в погонах знают, но сидят ровно. У нас есть версия, что первое и второе как-то связано, но кто мы такие, чтобы об этом говорить.

😢14👍4🥱4😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @truepolitsib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алюминиевые огурцы
@aluminievie · 38,700
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Восьмой канал Z
@kanal8_krsk · 44,363
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Kras Mash
@kras_mash · 50,178
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
ТВК
@tvknew · 55,075
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Борус
@borusio · 67,968
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Михаил Котюков
@mkotyukov · 49,407
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
ЧП Красноярск
@kraschp · 141,751
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
KJA Авиабилеты Красноярск
@kja_krsk · 59,345
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
NGS24.RU — Новости Красноярска
@ngs24_krsk · 63,060
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“А вы точно сибирский политолог?” (@truepolitsib), 3,110 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truepolitsib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.