Channel
@trushin_math
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,798subscribers
+1,317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002232012343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trushin_math |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trushin_math |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 8,798 | +240 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 8,558 | +390 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 8,168 | +143 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 8,025 | +132 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 7,893 | +187 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 7,706 | +56 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 7,650 | +41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 7,609 | +122 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 7,487 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 7,481 | first reading |
102 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 101 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84,473 |
| Reactions total | 1,011 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,017 reactions across 90 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 369 | 36.3% | |
| 👍 | 236 | 23.2% | |
| 🔥 | 195 | 19.2% | |
| 😁 | 60 | 5.90% | |
| 🥰 | 56 | 5.51% | |
| 🙏 | 43 | 4.23% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 2.16% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 1.67% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.688% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,017 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё новое будет на курсе ) Мы опираемся на задачи из вариантов разных лет и добавляем в программу всё новое Так что можно смело записываться (там скидку на первый месяц подписки повысили до 55%)
❤🔥3
Анонимный вопрос для Бориса Трушина: Здравствуйте,БВ,а вы будете разбирать новую задачу из первой части на сложном курсе от 60 до 100?
👍1
Кстати, про новую задачу в ЕГЭ. Вчера отправил редактору книжку, а там есть такая глава:
😁8😱5
Рассказал, что убрали и что добавили в ЕГЭ-2027
🥰12👌4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥20
В этом году есть таки небольшие чисто косметические изменения Но по сложности ничего не поменялось )
🔥9
Как заниматься на двух курсах сразу? Показалось, что это может быть актуальным не только для того, кто спрашивал ) Для 11 классов есть 2 курса подготовки к ЕГЭ: - курс с 0 до 70 для 10-11 класса - курс с 60 до 100 для 11 класса На первом курсе мы разбираемся в основном с первой частью и более простыми вариантами заданий второй части ЕГЭ. На втором, наоборот, максимум внимания уделяем второй части, в том числе и самым…
🙏4
Анонимный вопрос для Бориса Трушина: Здравствуйте, как можно заниматься сразу на двух курсах:с 0-70 и с 60-100? Купить два курса?
Чтобы хорошо сдать ЕГЭ, первую часть нужно решать за 30 минут. А чтобы решать её быстро, есть маленькие хитрости. Например, я рассказывал, как быстро считать проценты: https://youtube.com/shorts/X7OpcKGDKvo?si=KAEEmhBHCb8BVgoq
❤🔥7
Перед началом учебного года в Фоксфорде всегда скидки ) Сейчас тоже подключили В боте теперь можно записаться со скидкой 25% и на курс подготовки к ОГЭ, и на любой из курсов подготовки к ЕГЭ при полной оплате. Просто выбирайте нужный класс и говорите менеджеру, что хотите учиться у меня со скидкой. Записаться на курсы через бот
❤🔥6
Некоторые текстовые задачи из ЕГЭ вообще можно решить в уме. Вот шпаргалка, которая поможет вам задачи на совместную работу решать быстро и легко. #день_егэ@trushin_math
❤🔥5
В задании 10 вам могут попасться разные типы задач. Посмотрите, если хотите примерно оценить уровень сложности реального экзамена и разобраться, как решать их за пару минут. Ссылка на запись на Ютубе Ссылка на запись в ВК #видеоразборы@trushin_math #день_егэ@trushin_math
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @trushin_math. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@trushin_math edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Найдите значение выражения (log₁₂10)/(log₁₂2)+log₂8/5.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Найдите значение выражения log₀,₇10 - log₀,₇7.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Найдите значение выражения log₂56 - log₂7.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Найдите корень уравнения log₃(7 − x) = log₃8.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Найдите корень уравнения 7⁻⁶⁻ˣ = 343.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Найдите корень уравнения √(4x − 23) = 3.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Борис Трушин | Математика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | Фоксфорд” (@trushin_math), 8,798 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trushin_math.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.