Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 73 days, net -173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,642–37,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 22:00
36,832
+87
16 Oct 2026, 19:46
36,745
+38
15 Oct 2026, 18:30
36,707
-1
14 Oct 2026, 15:19
36,708
-9
13 Oct 2026, 07:55
36,717
-33
9 Oct 2026, 01:19
36,750
-25
4 Oct 2026, 16:16
36,775
-56
26 Sept 2026, 15:01
36,831
-28
19 Sept 2026, 15:38
36,859
-23
17 Sept 2026, 00:39
36,882
-15
15 Sept 2026, 03:42
36,897
+41
13 Sept 2026, 10:37
36,856
-19
11 Sept 2026, 15:38
36,875
-30
8 Sept 2026, 22:16
36,905
-37
5 Sept 2026, 12:16
36,942
-24
3 Sept 2026, 10:46
36,966
-7
2 Sept 2026, 06:48
36,973
-22
1 Sept 2026, 08:17
36,995
-17
31 Aug 2026, 11:24
37,012
-15
30 Aug 2026, 12:17
37,027
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 36,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,170
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.648%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
57 (20 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
104,880
Reactions total
680
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 19:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,640 reactions across 57 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5456394914617110971
1,131
42.8%
custom 5424974776420548546
790
29.9%
custom 5272023801234734715
216
8.18%
custom 5422678240227506607
215
8.14%
custom 5213075628500207444
150
5.68%
custom 5474419526558820393
50
1.89%
custom 5456575938898701524
46
1.74%
custom 5465433849385205072
42
1.59%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Узнай больше об аромате за пару секунд
Мы продолжаем развивать нашу цифровую экосистему, чтобы делать DARKSIDE WORLD еще удобнее.
Сейчас мы обновили каталог продуктов. Теперь в карточке аромата ты можешь увидеть его статус:
- НОВИНКА. Аромат выпущен не более 6 месяцев назад.
- ХИТ. Один из самых популярных ароматов DARKSIDE CORP.
- ЛИМИТКА. Эксклюзивный продукт, выпущенный ограниченным тиражом.
- СНЯТ. Аромат снят…
PINK ME уже здесь. Кажется, между вами что-то намечается.
Аромат сладких ягод клубники с легкой кислой ноткой. Забей на всё, чтобы познакомиться поближе — можно тет-а-тет, а можно с друзьями.
Рассказываем, как обращаться с PINK ME.
Если любишь помягче:
1. Забей пушисто и с отступом в классическую чашу.
2. Прогрей на 2-3 минуты дольше, чем раньше.
Если хочется поярче:
1. Бери классическую чашу и забей пушисто в ле…
Открой для себя легенды DARKSIDE по-новому!
Эти 12 ароматов уже давно стали классикой кальянной культуры. Сейчас ты можешь оценить, как круто они раскрываются на новом сырье и новых ароматизаторах!
Приходи на CREATION DEGUSTATION MONO — масштабную серию дегустаций, которая пройдет по всей России с 18 по 20 октября.
Там ты сможешь:
⏺Поробовать легендарные ароматы на новом DARKSIDE.
⏺Заценить новинку DARKSIDE PINK M…
Платформа DARKSIDE WORLD может быть частично или полностью недоступна.
В связи с масштабной аварией облачного провайдера могут наблюдаться технические проблемы в работе платформы.
Мы уже работаем над восстановлением и обязательно сообщим об этом в социальных сетях.
#DARKSIDEmixpack для марафона на все выходные
Сегодня миксуем на SABOTAGE ЯГОДНЫЕ ДРАЖЕ — кисло-сладких ягодных драже для тех, кто не боится попасть в зависимость.
Держи 8 авторских сочетаний от наших амбассадоров:
Сладкие:
⏺SABOTAGE ЯГОДНЫЕ ДРАЖЕ 50% + DARKSIDE YAGODA MALINA 50%
⏺SABOTAGE ЯГОДНЫЕ ДРАЖЕ 30% + DARKSIDE GRAPE CORE 40% + DARKSIDE BLUEBERRY BLAST 2.0 30%
Свежие:
⏺SABOTAGE ЯГОДНЫЕ ДРАЖЕ 80% + XPERIENC…
Краснодар и Ростов-на-Дону!
Уже на следующей неделе проведем у вас открытые смены, чтобы ближе познакомить с новым DARKSIDE. Вход свободный — смотрите расписание!
Это новая рубрика о легендарных ароматах DARKSIDE.
Рассказываем, за что их любит комьюнити и почему они стали базой для многих лаунжей. У каждого из них есть своя история, свои фишки и даже собственный амбассадор в лице топового профи.
Начнем с первого хвойного аромата в России.
Изначально мы рассчитывали, что NEEDLS будут использовать в качестве оттеночного аромата. Но вам он так зашел, что многие до сих пор заби…
Новый #DARKSIDEmixpack — на этот раз с SABOTAGE МАРАКУЙЯ
Кисло-сладкая маракуйя, которой надоело быть «просто ноткой» в мультифрукте. Собрали с ней 8 миксов, чтобы тебе было из чего выбрать:
Сладкие:
⏺SABOTAGE МАРАКУЙЯ 50% + DARKSIDE WILD FOREST 50%
⏺SABOTAGE МАРАКУЙЯ 40% + DARKSIDE KALEE GRAPEFRUIT 2.0 30% + DARKSIDE STRAWBERRY LIGHT 30%
Свежие:
⏺SABOTAGE МАРАКУЙЯ 50% + XPERIENCE MULTY FRUITY 40% + DARKSIDE SUPER…
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @trydarkside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@trydarkside edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DARKSIDE” (@trydarkside), 36,832 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trydarkside.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
