23 measurements spanning 28 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,636–13,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 09:27
13,643
-2
2 Sept 2026, 02:08
13,645
+3
31 Aug 2026, 07:04
13,642
-3
30 Aug 2026, 06:24
13,645
-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:14
13,647
+4
28 Aug 2026, 08:25
13,643
-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:22
13,646
-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:05
13,648
-5
23 Aug 2026, 23:53
13,653
+4
22 Aug 2026, 08:47
13,649
-2
20 Aug 2026, 19:43
13,651
+1
19 Aug 2026, 16:56
13,650
-1
18 Aug 2026, 17:22
13,651
+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:44
13,648
-4
16 Aug 2026, 21:05
13,652
-1
15 Aug 2026, 14:19
13,653
+3
14 Aug 2026, 01:05
13,650
-7
12 Aug 2026, 17:58
13,657
-10
11 Aug 2026, 19:22
13,667
-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:44
13,671
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.63%
avg views ÷ 13,643 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
81 (29 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
77,713
Reactions total
7,940
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
44m 16s
Average length
1m 51s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,043 reactions across 76 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,065
56.0%
💯
1,950
21.6%
🔥
742
8.21%
👍
591
6.54%
🙏
364
4.03%
🎉
158
1.75%
🏆
70
0.774%
🕊
48
0.531%
👏
37
0.409%
👌
11
0.122%
😱
4
0.044%
😁
3
0.033%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,607 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌙 Большую часть своей жизни многие люди проводят во сне 😴. Это означает, что они не осознают свои истинные потребности и желания, движутся на ощупь по текущей линии жизни и хаотично перемещаются в Пространстве вариантов 🌀, никак не управляя этим процессом и не отдавая себе отчёта в своих действиях. Они не знают, что ими движет, но совершенно ясно только одно: это не они управляют своей реальностью, а реальность управ…
🌟 Друзья, мы живём в период, когда привычные опоры рассыпаются, а новые ещё не сформировались 🍂. Внешние события ускоряются, внутреннее напряжение растёт ⚡️. Всё чаще мы ловим себя на том, что пытаемся удержать равновесие во всей этой турбулентности, - а оно ускользает 🌪.
Мы ставим намерения, делаем шаги к нему, а внутри продолжаем держаться — за прошлое, за свои страхи, за ожидания 😔. Нас призывают довериться проис…
🎥 В этом видео Татьяна Самарина разъясняет понятие "любящее присутствие".
🎞 Это фрагмент бесплатного вебинара, который прошел 14 августа. Запись вебинара можно посмотреть по этой ссылке - https://tserf.ru/lp/efir-14-08-2026/
🌟 Старт курса «Управление реальностью» — 16 сентября!
Пройдите путь от «спящего человека» к Вершителю своей жизни. На курсе вы освоите управление вниманием, научитесь слышать Душу, повысите эне…
🎥 В этом видео Татьяна Самарина отвечает на вопрос участницы: 📩 «Мы с моим молодым человеком любим и уважаем друг друга, нам хорошо вместе. Он очень порядочный и хороший. Но всё же есть одна вещь, где мы не сходимся: он не очень амбициозный человек, и мне бы хотелось, чтобы он был более целеустремлённый. Он добрый, спокойный, верный, честный - именно такой мне и нужен, и я не вижу никого другого рядом с собой, однако…
⛰️ Алтай. Послесловие.
Приветствую всех!👋
Прошло совсем немного времени с момента нашего возвращения из Горного Алтая, однако ощущения — словно всё это было очень давно и совсем в другой жизни. ✨
Почему именно так? Вероятно, это связано с особенностями самого пространства.☝️
Именно этим и хочется поделиться по итогам данного путешествия.
Я много писал о сакральных местах и традициях Алтая и алтайцев ещё до поездк…
🌟 Базовый онлайн-курс «Управление реальностью» — старт 16 сентября!
Друзья, бестселлеры Вадима Зеланда помогли миллионам людей изменить свою жизнь. Но только чтения книг недостаточно — для устойчивых результатов необходима интенсивная практика. Приглашаем вас на курс, где вы не просто узнаете теорию, а погрузитесь в эффективное применение Трансерфинга ежедневно, шаг за шагом преображая свою реальность. ✨
Курс состои…
⁉️ ВОПРОС: "Я часто задумываюсь о смысле и роли маятников в нашей жизни. В Трансерфинге маятники рассматриваются как негативная формация в основном. Мы теряем энергию, когда отдаём её маятникам 😨. По мере ослабления нашей энергии мы более и более удаляемся от себя и своих истинных целей 🎯, но маятники создаются сознательно или бессознательно людьми или группами людей. Можно ли жить всем в своё удовольствие, заниматьс…
❤19👍8🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @tserf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tserf edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 261,823 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Vadim Zeland Official @VadimZeland_Official · 43,388 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Вадим Зеланд - Трансерфинг реальности @zelandbox · 79,675 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Трансерфинг реальности @transerfing_realnosti_tyt · 149,643 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Секреты Трансерфинга @secretytranserfinga · 37,063 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Джон Кехо | Официальный канал @johnkehoe · 68,854 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трансерфинг Центр. Официально от Вадима Зеланда” (@tserf), 13,643 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tserf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.