Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Цитата

Channel

Цитата

@tsitatym

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,178subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379028590
TypeChannel
Username@tsitatym
Created2 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tsitatym

Growth

13,17813,25413,2167 August 2026 — 13,238 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,233 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,240 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,241 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,239 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,231 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,244 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,238 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,254 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,249 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,244 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,242 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,236 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,227 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,209 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,213 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,208 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,213 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,216 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,213 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,210 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,182 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,178 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,167–13,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 18:4013,178-4
3 Sept 2026, 17:1713,182-28
2 Sept 2026, 09:1913,210-3
1 Sept 2026, 12:4413,213-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:2813,216+3
30 Aug 2026, 09:5213,213+5
29 Aug 2026, 12:0813,208-6
28 Aug 2026, 15:2513,214+1
27 Aug 2026, 11:5513,213+4
26 Aug 2026, 13:2813,209-18
25 Aug 2026, 13:1213,227-9
24 Aug 2026, 15:1513,236-6
22 Aug 2026, 23:1813,242-2
21 Aug 2026, 16:2813,244-5
20 Aug 2026, 17:3713,249-5
19 Aug 2026, 20:2813,254+2
18 Aug 2026, 21:3413,252+14
17 Aug 2026, 19:0513,238-6
16 Aug 2026, 18:0613,244+13
13 Aug 2026, 15:5713,231first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 13,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held78 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total85,791
Reactions total1,003
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,373 reactions across 78 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66748.6%
❤‍🔥44532.4%
1077.79%
282.04%
👍251.82%
💯221.60%
🔥141.02%
🍓130.947%
🏆130.947%
🆒100.728%
🤔60.437%
🥰60.437%
🌚40.291%
👎40.291%
👌20.146%
💊20.146%
🦄20.146%
😁10.073%
😍10.073%
🥴10.073%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 78 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tsitatym. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC369 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Библия учит нас любить ближних. Она так же учит нас любить врагов. Может быть, потому, что это обычно одни и те же люди? Гилберт Кит

11🤔3

2 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC511 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Очень просто сидеть в монастыре и всех любить. Очень сложно — оставаться добрым и понимающим в самой гуще уставших и озлобленных людей. Эмиль Чоран

11❤‍🔥54

1 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC713 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Лучшее время, чтобы посадить дерево, было 20 лет назад. Следующий подходящий момент — сегодня. Китайская пословица

❤‍🔥1222

1 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC776 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Каждый из нас стареет, и это естественный процесс. Время постоянно движется, секунда за секундой. Ничто не может остановить это, но мы можем правильно использовать свое время. Это в наших руках. Верим ли мы в духовную традицию или нет, мы должны использовать свое время осмысленно. Если в течение дней, недель, месяцев и лет мы используем свое время осмысленным образом — когда наступит наш последний день, мы будем сча

❤‍🔥103

31 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC818 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Время — это меч; если ты не сразишь его делом, оно сразит тебя забвением. Арабская мудрость

❤‍🔥13

31 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC944 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ничто в жизни не вызывает такого страха, если это понять. Пришло время больше понимать, чтобы меньше бояться. Мария Склодовская-Кюри

10❤‍🔥2

30 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Важно не то, что с нами происходит, а то, как мы реагируем на происходящее. Элеонора Рузвельт

❤‍🔥134🆒4

30 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,130 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Самый смелый акт — это думать о себе вслух. Коко Шанель

106❤‍🔥2🥴1

29 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,270 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Иногда чем больше думаешь — тем больше запутываешься. Потому и не стоит особенно ломать себе голову. Это только всё портит и усложняет. Важные решения принимаются мгновенно. Э.М. Ремарк

❤‍🔥183

29 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,250 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Мы редко знаем, когда в последний раз сидим за одним столом, идём знакомой дорогой или слышим привычный голос. Поэтому не относись к близости как к чему-то гарантированному. Любить сегодня мудрее, чем однажды сожалеть о словах, которые можно было сказать, пока человек был рядом. Тхить Нят Хань

20

28 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,430 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Выбирая себе настроение, помни, что даже маленькая нота может изменить всю симфонию жизни… Аль Квотион

❤‍🔥14

28 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,330 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

О характере человека можно судить по тому, как он ведёт себя с теми, кто ничем не может быть ему полезен, а также с теми, кто не может дать ему сдачи. Эбигайл Ван Берен

17❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @tsitatym. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Цитаты | Умные мысли
@tsitaty · 34,628
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Афоризмы ©️ Цитаты про любовь ©️ Статусы
@AphoTG · 36,419
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Цитата” (@tsitatym), 13,178 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsitatym.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.