Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚狗推之家🌈曝光新闻资讯

Channel

东南亚狗推之家🌈曝光新闻资讯

@ttcgax

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

94,685subscribers

+40,705 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002950292966
TypeChannel
Username@ttcgax
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttcgax

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

51,616108,15579,885.57 August 2026 — 53,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,947 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,352 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,730 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,616 subscribers13 August 2026 — 100,676 subscribers14 August 2026 — 108,155 subscribers15 August 2026 — 107,218 subscribers17 August 2026 — 106,269 subscribers18 August 2026 — 105,319 subscribers19 August 2026 — 104,542 subscribers20 August 2026 — 104,138 subscribers21 August 2026 — 103,941 subscribers22 August 2026 — 103,577 subscribers24 August 2026 — 103,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 102,801 subscribers26 August 2026 — 102,171 subscribers27 August 2026 — 101,998 subscribers28 August 2026 — 101,838 subscribers29 August 2026 — 101,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 101,627 subscribers31 August 2026 — 101,020 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100,111 subscribers2 September 2026 — 99,485 subscribers3 September 2026 — 99,148 subscribers6 September 2026 — 98,529 subscribers9 September 2026 — 97,592 subscribers11 September 2026 — 97,070 subscribers13 September 2026 — 96,685 subscribers15 September 2026 — 96,377 subscribers17 September 2026 — 96,195 subscribers19 September 2026 — 95,972 subscribers26 September 2026 — 94,685 subscribers94,6857 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +40,705. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,135–116,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 19:1894,685-1,287
19 Sept 2026, 16:1595,972-223
17 Sept 2026, 06:0196,195-182
15 Sept 2026, 02:5796,377-308
13 Sept 2026, 14:1796,685-385
11 Sept 2026, 21:5897,070-522
9 Sept 2026, 11:2097,592-937
6 Sept 2026, 01:2098,529-619
3 Sept 2026, 19:3899,148-337
2 Sept 2026, 12:4799,485-626
1 Sept 2026, 10:58100,111-909
31 Aug 2026, 07:52101,020-607
30 Aug 2026, 06:19101,627-98
29 Aug 2026, 03:12101,725-113
28 Aug 2026, 06:38101,838-160
27 Aug 2026, 07:14101,998-173
26 Aug 2026, 06:45102,171-630
25 Aug 2026, 05:26102,801-298
24 Aug 2026, 04:19103,099-478
22 Aug 2026, 10:56103,577first reading

Engagement

383 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.873%
avg views ÷ 94,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
827
248 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
248
of 383 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 178 of 248 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held383 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total205,073
Reactions total3,450
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40m 50s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 72 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,459 reactions across 184 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩37510.8%
🔥36410.5%
💯35510.3%
🥰35310.2%
👍35210.2%
❤34910.1%
🎉34810.1%
❤‍🔥3269.42%
😍3028.73%
⚡611.76%
👏511.47%
😁401.16%
💋310.896%
🍓220.636%
🏆220.636%
🐳220.636%
🌭200.578%
🍾200.578%
👌170.491%
🤡160.463%
3 further kinds130.376%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 186 of the 383 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 383 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC3 views0 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

法国女子迪拜买100套豪宅!资金从哪来?警方调查发现惊人内幕‼️ 在迪拜,斯韦特兰娜·A.名下的房地产价值数千万欧元。这位出生于俄罗斯、2017年入籍法国的女性,今年7月在法国滨海阿尔卑斯省被捕。此前,法国国家金融检察院根据《世界报》2025年4月的报道展开了调查。9月25日,法国国家金融检察院确认,斯 韦特兰娜·A.随后被巴黎预审法官立案审查并羁押,她被控“有组织诈骗、严重税务欺诈洗钱以及共谋犯罪”。案件由法国国家税务犯罪调查局负责侦办。一位司法消息人士透露,斯韦特兰娜·A.和她的英国籍伴侣罗伯特·H.被怀疑通过“操纵加密货币价格”进行有组织诈骗,可能借此为购置房地产筹集资金。从公开资料看,她的财富并不显眼。这位45岁的女性在领英上仅标明自己是一家跨国旅游公司尼斯分支的项目经理。然而,《世界报》的调查揭示,仅在2022年,她就在迪拜投入超过5000万欧元,购入约100套公寓和3栋豪华别墅。这些房产大部分已出租,2022年至2…

26 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC4 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_1411761456

26 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC6 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

反转争议爆发!巴防长公布空战新说法,7 架印机战果引不小质疑‼️ 眼下这桩事,得从巴基斯坦国防部长赫瓦贾·阿西夫最近抛出的一番话说起。据印度多家媒体转述,这位老资格的巴方官员在公开场合冒出一个新版本——法国达索公司那头已经点头,认可2025年5月那场大打出手中,是巴空军的"枭龙"参与打下了7架印度战机。 阿西夫嘴上还留了个尾巴,说手里攥着材料,只是眼下不方便亮出来。这个说法一出,等于把一年多前那场空战的账本又翻了个底朝天。 新德里那头听完直接炸了锅。印度几家专盯军事口的媒体连夜跟进,标题一个比一个冲,有的干脆把阿西夫的话解读成"7架阵风被巴方送下天",接着就是长篇大论开骂,措辞里满是"荒唐""胡说八道"之类的火药味。要知道,阵风在印度空军里被捧成招牌货,一架落地就够印度舆论疼半年,一口气报出七架的损失数字,等于当着全世界抽印度空军的脸,反弹自然小不了。把时间倒回2025年5月那几天,情况其实没这么夸张。 巴方最早对外通报的…

🎉2👏1

26 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,110 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

柬埔寨劳工证办理出新规‼️ 据可靠消息源反馈:自明天起,所有办劳工证者必须要去自己居住地的警察局,开一份居住证明,然后拿原件才可以安排办理劳工证。如若没有,需多加110$作为处理费用。

❤2🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,590 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨新闻 电诈人员走机场“VIP通道”,移民警察半年收超20万美元‼️ 柬埔寨反贪局(ACU)9月25日公布,德崇国际机场一名移民警察涉嫌收钱为电诈团伙提供入境便利,甚至帮助被列入黑名单、持假护照的外国人进入柬埔寨。今年上半年,他涉嫌经手301宗非法业务,收取超过20万美元。 这名警员名为裴帕彭(Phe Phat Pheng),30岁,警衔为中尉。 据反贪局调查,他为不同入境服务明码标价:商务签证380至420美元、旅游签证120美元、电子商务入境手续900美元,VIP快速通关则收费450美元。客户只需提前发送机票、护照等资料,抵达机场后再提供照片,便有人负责接应和协调入境。 此案是国公省七星海电诈腐败案的延伸调查。反贪局称,这名警员与中国籍涉诈人员张建强(又名蔡有元)有关联,曾协助其团伙成员入境。张建强此前被指向当地乡长行贿,以获取电诈活动的庇护。

🔥2🎉1

26 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC≈1,620 views1 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

金边多家咖啡馆涉卖淫被查‼️ 9月25日晚11点半,金边宪兵突查堆谷区598号路铁轨附近多家咖啡馆,发现这些场所涉嫌暗中提供非法性服务,现场多名男女被带走,并查扣一批相关物证。 这些咖啡馆此前已被反人口贩运部门查处并警告,但之后仍继续营业。目前涉案人员已被带回宪兵基地处理,相关场所被永久关闭。

👍1

26 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿:金边市森速区奥贝克卡姆分区凌晨一处地点被检查,现场抓捕了多名小姐‼️

⚡2

25 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,610 views1 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨新闻“七星海乡长”咬出一人:一名移民警察违法获利超20万美元‼️ 柬埔寨国家反贪局今天通报,国公省基里萨科县七星海地区乡长廉伦涉嫌腐败及洗钱案的最新进展,指控移民警察培帕朋中尉涉案。 柬反贪局指出,培帕朋协助涉诈头目蔡友源及其团伙从德崇国际机场入境,并为包括黑名单人员在内的外籍人士违规办理商务、电子及旅游签证,以及提供VIP快速通关服务,每单收取120至900美元不等。在2026年1月至6月期间,培帕朋通过301起违规操作非法获利超过20万美元,并用于购买豪宅与车辆。 目前,金边市初级法院检方已对培帕朋以滥用职权罪、电诈共同犯罪及洗钱罪提起公诉。

🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTC20 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

每年1万亿利息打水漂!美议员痛批特朗普败家,再不刹车就要完蛋‼️ 佐赫兰·马姆达尼的观点揭示了一个不容忽视的事实:美国的政治体系辜负了美国人民。他所代表的主义思潮引发了担忧,但任何目睹华盛顿长期政策无效的人都不应对此感到惊讶。每隔两年,建制派政客总是用同样空洞的承诺争取选票:让政府承担责任、降低物价、捍 卫美国梦。数十年来,这种循环不断重复,情况却愈加恶化。华盛顿的政客不仅没有追究政府责任,反而大幅扩张联邦政府,导致美国人背负了40万亿美元的债务重担。国会一边承诺降低物价,一边批准大规模政府支出,结果物价和利率双双飙升。以保护美国人民为名,联邦政府的监管措施无孔不入,压缩了机会,几乎扼杀了美国梦。我们都目睹了这些现象,并感到愤怒。年轻一代的美国人濒临反抗,这完全可以理解。对他们的父母和祖父母而言曾经触手可及的美国梦,如今已变得遥不可及。华盛顿的失败让他们感到被欺骗,对政治体系失去信心,陷入一个买不起房、无法获得体面医疗,甚至难…

🎉1👍1😁1

25 Sept 2026, 03:11 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

#网友反馈:金三角特区“鑫景国际”今天凌晨4点,治安局端了一个打野的团伙,抓了好几个人,现场查获了一批作案设备。

🥰1😁1

24 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC25 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:金边7玛卡区持续开展外国人住宿场所检查,查处网络诈骗活动‼️ 9月23日,金边市7玛卡区区长腾·索特(Theng Sothul)继续带队开展外国人住宿管理检查行动。 行动重点检查酒店、公寓、宾馆、企业及各类住宅等外国人集中居住场所,并进一步针对涉嫌从事网络诈骗(Online Scams)的违法活动展开查处。 行动中,执法人员拘留部分外国人,并查扣一批相关物品。目前,案件及相关人员情况仍在进一步调查处理中。

24 Sept 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,570 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

#菲律宾新闻 皮尤调查 菲律宾年轻人更倾向支持中国‼️ 皮尤研究中心2026年春季全球态度调查显示,菲律宾不同年龄层对中国的看法存在明显差异,年轻人对中国持正面看法的比例明显高于年长群体。 数据显示,18至34岁的菲律宾受访者中,47%对中国 持正面看法;35至49岁为44%;50岁及以上则降至27%。 不过,年轻人对中国评价相对积极,并不意味着菲律宾社会对中国的安全担忧消失。皮尤调查显示,76%的菲律宾人将中国视为对菲律宾的主要威胁,86%对涉及中国的领土争端表示担忧。 在“中国是否是可靠伙伴”这一问题上,菲律宾整体评价仍然偏低,仅42%的受访者认为中国是可靠伙伴。相比之下,菲律宾人对美国的相关评价更高。皮尤指出,菲律宾也是少数对美国的正面评价高于中国的国家之一。 这份调查于2026年春季进行,皮尤在全球37个国家和地区调查了4.5万多名成年人,其中包括菲律宾。 菲律宾样本数据显示,菲律宾社会对中国的经济、国际关系和安全议…

👏1🔥1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 383 posts we hold for @ttcgax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚狗推之家🌈曝光新闻资讯” (@ttcgax), 94,685 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttcgax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.